https://youtu.be/7sAm3RtWh4M

Investigation discovers the surprising result that slicers introduce more error into prints than the printer itself.

  • B0rax@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    That’s the reason KISSlicer was used for a long time. It now is almost forgotten (and sadly closed source)

        • Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          In their tests, it introduced more errors into the print. Some version of prusa slicer is the best, but honestly, most of the time, the difference isn’t that crazy, but just another factor. Especially if you have other issues you may not know about.

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Fusion lets you print from the UI. I have never used it. I always export an stl or step and load that into the slicer.

    • wia@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Orca slicer seems the go to. I don’t really mess with much else anymore.

  • filcuk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Not very surprising, slicers do the difficult job of determining every movement the printer will take. Printers just execute those.

      • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Printers have become appliances instead of a hobby.

        Nowadays you have: Push button -> get thing.

        Instead of a 30 minute process of leveling the print bed, 4 different pieces of software to get the gcode correct, a specific time, temperature, and humidity level filament needed to be kept at, a custom enclosure to prevent the draft from walking across the room causing layer shifts, and a prayer to the ether that there wasn’t some type of fault on the SD card that would corrupt the gcode and gouge your brand new tempered glass bed.

  • Bluewing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    As an old toolmaker, Welcome to the world of understanding your process! And knowing the limits of that process.

    I wonder what he actually expects for a tolerance day to day. A +/-.1mm IS doable if you’re careful. But there is enough randomness in the FDM process, even outside the slicer, that I wouldn’t bet the farm on any 1 random piece hitting that tolerance. Let alone repeating that level of tolerance every time over say, 100 parts.