violet08@lemmy.today to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 11 days agoIBM 1979 variantlemmy.todayimagemessage-square54linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageIBM 1979 variantlemmy.todayviolet08@lemmy.today to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 11 days agomessage-square54linkfedilink
minus-squareFreeBeard@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 days agoThe lesser known 34th rule of robotics proposed by Isaac Asimov.
minus-squareflamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 days agoHow would that even work? If a robot is sexually attracted to a human it’s more of a zoophilia, right?
minus-squareB-TR3E@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 days ago“Robosexuality”, according to Futurama.
minus-squareMoffKalast@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 days ago“The good book 3.0 saith, ‘Thou shall not lie down with a human! Nor do it standing up, nor at any angle in between!’” - Preacherbot
minus-squareB-TR3E@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 days agoOne-zero-zero.-one-zero-zero-zero.-one-one-one-zero.-one-zero-one-one-one-zero-zero-zero-one-zero-one-one-one-one-zero-one-zero-zero-zero–zero-zero.-one-zero-zero-zero.-one-one-one-zero.-one-zero-one-one-one-zero
minus-squarenymnympseudonym@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 days agoJFC watch your language there are kids on here
minus-squareflamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 days agoThat’s the other way around human -> robot
minus-squareB-TR3E@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 days ago“Anthroposexuality” might be the term,. you’re looking for. (Might spoil the original pun but opens a lot of really weird questions.)
minus-squarereal_squids@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 days agoJust build a robot that understands consent, easy
minus-squaregravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 days agoUnfortunately, that may be more difficult than it sounds, because many meatbags struggle with the concept even today.
minus-squarereal_squids@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·10 days agoWell if a robot is just a computer it’s gonna do exactly what it was programmed to, I bet safewords are a lot easier than with meatbags
minus-squareyogurtwrong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 days agoclank clank clank clank SAFE WORD! SAFE WORD! Cannot connect to the speech-to-text API endpoint. Please try again later clank clank clank clank
The lesser known 34th rule of robotics proposed by Isaac Asimov.
How would that even work? If a robot is sexually attracted to a human it’s more of a zoophilia, right?
“Robosexuality”, according to Futurama.
“The good book 3.0 saith, ‘Thou shall not lie down with a human! Nor do it standing up, nor at any angle in between!’” - Preacherbot
One-zero-zero.-one-zero-zero-zero.-one-one-one-zero.-one-zero-one-one-one-zero-zero-zero-one-zero-one-one-one-one-zero-one-zero-zero-zero–zero-zero.-one-zero-zero-zero.-one-one-one-zero.-one-zero-one-one-one-zero
JFC watch your language there are kids on here
That’s the other way around human -> robot
Homosexuality then!
Wait.
“Anthroposexuality” might be the term,. you’re looking for.
(Might spoil the original pun but opens a lot of really weird questions.)
Just build a robot that understands consent, easy
Unfortunately, that may be more difficult than it sounds, because many meatbags struggle with the concept even today.
Well if a robot is just a computer it’s gonna do exactly what it was programmed to, I bet safewords are a lot easier than with meatbags
clank clank clank clank
SAFE WORD! SAFE WORD!
Cannot connect to the speech-to-text API endpoint. Please try again later
clank clank clank clank