cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/technology/p/1247241/all-cars-sold-in-the-eu-now-require-a-camera-aimed-at-your-face-its-still-not-clear-wher

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1247209/all-cars-sold-in-the-eu-now-require-a-camera-aimed-at-your-face-its-still-not-clear-wher

Starting July 7, 2026, every new car sold in the European Union must include a driver monitoring camera aimed at your face. Glance at your phone, your kids in the back seat, or the radio for too long, and the car will flash a warning light and sound an alert.

Automakers have known this was coming for years. What they, and EU regulators, have never spelled out is what happens to that footage after the alert goes off.

While the intention behind the new system is difficult to dispute, its implementation has raised several concerns. Early real-world testing suggests the distraction warnings can be overly sensitive and potentially distracting.

  • halfapage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Will it be illegal to drive around with the camera accidentally punctured by a nail? Asking for a european.

    • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Design rules only apply at the time of sale. After that, the car only needs to meet roadworthy requirements.

      You should technically be able to gut the ECU and install a motec or haltech unit intended for a racecar. Start it with an ignition barrel like it’s 1999.

      • itsralC@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Still needs to pass inspection, and it won’t if their OBD thingy says X part (eg. the camera) is broken.

        • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Is that an inspection by the dealer that sold the car, or anyone else? In the UK and I assume many other places the roadworthiness test can be done at loads of different places and there is much less that they check. Pretty sure you don’t even need a functional speedometer although they will recommend fixing it.

      • halfapage@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        in what country?

        where I live certain safety elements have to be operational for a car to be legaly operating in public traffic (which is good)

        the question is if surveillance devices will be considered mandatory safety elements

      • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s a massive project as the ECU is likely quite custom to the vehicle and it’s electronics, while the engine likely relies on those electronics. It’s an expensive specialist job that would take iterations to complete reliably. As I suggested in another comment, perhaps an initiative for a large privacy advocacy group.

        • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          The ECU wiring and mapping is a huge chunk of the work when fitting a turbo. The R&D overhead is large, which is why kits exist for common cars.

          I wonder if anyone has replaced the ECU in a modern car. All the kits are for way older cars.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Depends on how the system is enabled. It can be enabled for theft control, so blocking the camera will not allow starting.