Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for privacy. But between setting up the birthdate when creating my children’s local account on their computers, and having to send a copy of their ID to every platform under the sun, I’d easily chose the former.

I’d even agree to a simple protocol (HTTP X-Over-18 / X-Over-21 headers?) to that.

  • flandish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    if they are claiming the new laws are for kid safety there must be existing already some external evidence of the need, no?

    • notabot@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      There’s fairly clear evidence at a societal level that access to, for instance, hardcore pornigraphic material is harmful to children, but that is very different to having evidence that a particular child is currently being exposed to it.

      • flandish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        exactly. so why do we need more laws that also happen to provide massive leak able tracking to corporations and govs without warrants, etc?

        • notabot@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’m not sure what you mean by “massive leak able tracking” in this case. It’s literally a flag that indicates the user’s age bracket, and means sites don’t use the really invassive options.