Someone (average smartphone user) complained to me the other day that there isn’t a clear solution to navigating the web because it’s either ai slop or the results are poor.

And I kinda agree, nowadays you do have to put in some more effort to get what you’re looking for.

And so I told them I’d compile a list of which search engines are best for what purpose.

So far I have:

Startpage: works, but does a poor job of finding product codes and whatnot.

Duckduckgo: gives more general results afaik

Ecosia: works great but relies on bing

I have tried things like qwant ect but haven’t really settled on those.

Any other suggestions?

I’d tell em to use udm14 but it’s still google so I’d rather keep that as a plan B.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I never understood the hype about it. I tried it for a while then my trial expired. I cannot say I miss it. It was okay, nothing that blew my mind

        • Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          If you only searched without exploring its various options and features, that makes sense. When you start blocking, boosting, and pinning domains; start exploring lenses and everything, it’s benefits become obvious.

          • WizardJr@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            That was exactly what I did, but I still found the quality of its searches ultimately no better than a standard Google search with a basic ad blocker purging the sponsors and AI summaries. Not worth half its price, especially when the guy getting the money is as nutty as he is.

  • ShutUpWesley@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    DDG is my goto, I always have a SearXNG instance, but it’s relatively slow and runs into problems too frequently to be my goto

  • Matt@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I have been using Brave Search for a couple of years and have been very satisfied with the results. It uses its own index instead of relying on Bing or Google like most search engines. The summaries are also one of the few cases that I have found AI to be useful for some more obscure questions.

    The image results are very poor though, so I still use DuckDuckGo for that.

    • myszka@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I hate that it sounds the same as Italian “caghi” meaning “you shit”

  • paydequeso@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I use Kagi for personal devices. I wish there was an open source alternative, but there’s not. So I’m stuck.

    For work or other devices, I use Qwant.

  • kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    qwant for basically everything, tineye for reverse image search and google for that 1 out of 100 searches that i cant get an adequate qwant search of

  • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Well, at risk of downvotes…

    I know what your asking but tbh I generally don’t search, at least not like we used to. It’s weird to say that, like I’m making some claim to heightened purity or some bullshit but it’s not that at all. Search is just … noisy AF these days.

    I actually find myself using fewer sources, more directly and own my terms.

    Eg: For something like PubMed, I go to pubmed (or define a proper boolean PICO search in an indexing tool or lit tool like Mendeley)

    https://www.mendeley.com/

    Or I can hit the wikipedia API (or even better, self hosted kiwix) and find what I need.

    https://kiwix.org/en/

    Or, for known, commonly visited sites (like fan wikis), I use self-written tools.

    There are plenty of sites have public facing, nicely formatted, JSON friendly results. Others are just clean to scrape. A recent discovery was Muvitimes (for getting movie times listings).

    https://muvitimes.com/

    These tools query my white listed sites to a particular depth, collect the results I need, and present them for review.

    You can then cache the info locally to query against using something like Meilisearch.

    https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch

    There are other options too. Something like Scrapy can collect structured data and a Trafilatura-like extractor can remove menus, adverts, and repeated page content.

    https://github.com/scrapy/scrapy

    I’ll even use something like self hosted Perplexica. It can query SearXNG, Tavily, Exa or other sources.

    https://github.com/kiranz/perplexica

    Honestly, if it’s a quick throw away search, I’ll call my self hosted llm, get it to pull from Tavilly and give me the summary and citations. That’s been miles better than most other options for me but YMMV.

    Finally, if you’re talking about random occasional searches on phone, when I can’t access my LAN, I don’t mind DDG-lite

    https://lite.duckduckgo.com/lite