

“You’re absolutely right. I did hallucinate sending an ambulance, more than once, earlier. Let me correct that and dispatch an ambulance to your location.”


“You’re absolutely right. I did hallucinate sending an ambulance, more than once, earlier. Let me correct that and dispatch an ambulance to your location.”


Yes. And perhaps, given time, accessing the wrong version of certain sensitive historic events could even be tracked that way.
Strictly speaking, we only have to govern the billionaires if we don’t just eat them…so it’s kind of a run-off between how easy to govern they decide to be, and how they taste…
(This is solely meant to humorous, officer, your honor.)


Thought about a couple cases of his favorite beer. Still might do that. Any other ideas?
Consumables that the person already likes make great gifts, since they will get used up and not sit around.
I usually avoid abusable substances, just in case the person has a carefully balanced relationship with that substance.
But you know your friend.
Sometimes I just ask first. No real reason this needs to be a surprise.
“I know you said you won’t take cash, but I’m going to grab you two cases of X as a thank you, on my way back.”
Then they get a chance to call me off, or redirect me if it would be a problem.
And I’ll always let them call it off with even a mild “no thanks”, since they might not want to say to me “I have a real problem with X and I can’t safely have thay much on hand.”.


Yes. And we know Microsoft was drooling over the day when they shut down that server, and everyone’s library stops working 30 days later, allowing Microsoft to re-sell them all the games they previously bought.


Learning to quit vim will get them very far in life
How dare you?! q:qwqEscEscEscQ!


Somehow it’s difficult for me to remember what I like?
I used to have mini-panic attacks when asked what I prefer.
Now, I just have memorized good enough responses that I won’t be unhappy with later.
Is that strange?
I’m told it’s not usual. So I guess so?


Does that make me non-human?
Nah. Human experience is much more varied than most people ever realize.
It does make you interesting.


I think a lack of enthusiasm has been kinda the default for me for as long as I remember
I’ve had life phases like that.
It doesn’t bother me as much, today, as it did, in the past.
Now, I focus on the things worth avoiding while I wait for my enthusiasm to return.
For me, enthusiasm returns, in bursts, eventually.


I would have upvoted this, but my client shows perfectly negative vote count, and that’s too funn to break.
Made me laugh. Thanks.


politicians like political donations.


I had not heard of that. Fascinating! Thanks!


Really meta can’t figure out are we humans or not with this massive of data they collect?
That part really pisses me off. Asking for any kind of identity verification is just them gas lighting their users.


I mean, they kind of did. It’s called Windows Subsystem for Linux, and it can run Linux programs on Windows, for anyone willing to coax it into working.
It’s not awful, but it cannot even do graphical programs yet. Wine is a decade or two ahead of it.
Edit: I would have bet it was proprietary, but it is MIT License. https://github.com/microsoft/WSL


deleted by creator
It think we can all relate to having pre-wedding jitters about how our spouse will feel when they finds out we are secretly just a pile of magically animated mud and sticks.


Soap box time:
Mythos is a clever algorithm, but it won’t make it into the history books.
The people getting excited have no fucking clue what is going on.
Claude Mythos is a VW Beetle - genuinely interesting design with an advertising budget larger than some counties, decorating a solution that isn’t remotely a good use of the money being spent on it.


I would be pissed at these headlines, if this were my work.
I, an expert, used the latest bullshit brute force libraries in a novel way to move human knowledge forward.
Headline: “Latest bullshit brute force library makes discovery!”
Linux, MacOS and Windows have been completely rewritten multiple times across their existence.
So it’s not like the original decisions are all still in play.
Windows and Mac OS were rewritten under some particular weird duresses of closed source profit driven engineering; so it has been a mix of improvements and seemingly illogical setbacks.
Linux developers still need to eat, so some of the same (corporate) influences are there.
But the average engineer who sets out to create a brand new completely modern operating system - usually decides to reuse any components of Linux that they don’t have any concerns with…
Which usually gives us yet another cool new Linux variant.
But sometimes we get…
something very different
A cool new FreeBSD variant!