• 20 Posts
  • 30 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: May 13th, 2024

help-circle



  • Eh. 8GB is unified memory, meaning it also needs to carry the graphics load. You’re making it sound like it is just working memory. MacOS is also more graphics heavy than PC, especially Linux based OS, so whatever efficiency you’ll get from the OS in terms of memory compression and management, you’ll also have to offer for the smooth expose, missing control and all the frosted glass translucent garbage they force on the users.

    8GB is shit low. Email and browsing, ok. But as soon as you have 40 tabs open in chrome, it will be email or browsing. Garageband sure, again dont run anything else in the background. But I doubt you’ll even be able to edit a 1080p project in iMovie without stutter on battery power. The biggest issue is that you can’t upgrade it, so whatever software upgrades happen, 8GB is all you’ll ever get.









  • that was debunked over 10 years ago

    [citation needed]

    I usually don’t respond to this anymore, but I hope people realise the true conspiracy theories were never about “Bush didn’t do it” or “jet fuel can’t melt steel beams”.

    If you, after seeing — 2 years of unsanctioned Israeli genocide, US playing Israel’s military sock puppet and how blackmail power structures work (as seen in the Epstein files) — still cannot comprehend how the world is run and the public is manipulated, I doubt you’ll ever see it.

    I wouldn’t call you dumb for that though. I think similar to being addicted to smoking, it has little to do with intelligence and more with whether someone is susceptible to government sanctioned propaganda.

    The only people who benefited from 9/11 were the billionaires in the MIC and the financial sector behind it. One would hope that someone above the level of intelligence of a Trump supporter would see that after 20 years of pointless wars.

    E: grammar and phrasing




  • I’ll just quote you to yourself, as we’re pretty much on the same page:

    If you approve someone, you don’t need to explain yourself, you would just say “I agree with this guy”. There’s no substance to it.

    However, if you downvote, you are saying “this is wrong”. Which is much different. When you accuse someone of being wrong, you should explain yourself, otherwise you’re being a dick.

    It’s fine if someone already answered with what you were going to answer. You can just upvote that guy and move on.

    EDIT: I’m absolutely in awe that this comment specifically gathered so many downvotes. And this is a good example of what I was referring to. Lots of people downvoted, and 0 ppl said why.

    You may think that those upvotes explain the downvotes, but they really don’t. And they don’t to a small majority of the people, so perhaps you can help out. A good start would be:

    You’re getting downvoted because

    Or

    I’m downvoting your post/comment because

    Or if you feel the upvoted comments are indeed addressing my concern “legal porn that looks like CP is morally extremely questionable and either won’t help the growth of Lemmy or would attract people I rather not associate with”, you can copy paste it.

    I also want to state this is occurring at a time where we are discovering pedophelia run all the way to the white house.





  • I was simply cross posting for discussion. And while I see the point that the OP is being a bit dramatic perhaps, as somebody else said on here: the downvotes and vehement opposition to the OP can be seen as support for pornographic content that seemingly depicts minors, even if the actors are in fact of legal age. And if there is one type of content where the user is more concerned about what it looks like than what it is, it would be pornography.

    Everyone can have different kinks, fetishes and sexual proclivities (SFW), but once you’re essentially advocating for pornography that visually identical to child pornography, it’s time for that uncomfortable look in the mirror I think. The free speech absolutist argument doesn’t really hold water. What would the absolutist argument be if the child pornography was mades using Sora or something similar? No minors would be involved in making that either right? I’m all for free speech, but to push this angle seems really grasping at straws.

    If a new user comes to Lemmy without NSFW filters and such content is among the first things they see, I wouldn’t expect them to sign up and become a regular contributor to the platform.

    I was hoping !fediverse@lemmy.world would be a place where this can be discussed, which I suppose it is, as this will rank nicely as “controversial”.


  • Fair points. I think you’re overestimating how much he still has to say.

    Don’t forget he is tired, has tons of medical issues, in serious mental decline, and kinda hates the job. He’s only there because Jack Smith would have changed his KFC buckets for prison food.

    The show is run by Jared, and a bunch of coke snorting or drinking sycophants. This one in particular is run by Rubio probably.

    But at the end of the day, there’s no heart, no love or compassion. Just money and small dick syndrome.

    Not to mention that the USA lost pretty much any war it was doing by itself or in hostile climates. There’s no coalition of the willing and once the Middle East warms up to Summer, it’s over.

    To be clear I also do know, there was just this little bit of coke left on the toilet seat from the last guy and I briefly saw things with a bit more clarity.




  • No. DJTs entire MO is pump and dump. This is a 10 day effort. All his military moves are hit and run. Now he will just to a bit more tweeting about how it will go on, both to appease the zionists and to stir unrest in the markets. When everything crashes enough or oil goes up enough because of Hormuz, he will back off, buy the dip and make more money for all his friends.

    The pump and dumps are how he keeps everyone protecting him.

    Not that the region will stabilise, but the US overt agressive involvement will probably be over by mid March.