You might want to look at the hostiles of Mexico and South America.

Or, the other way, the NYPD stations in Israel.

I think most people from rich countries would still prefer the US to be dominant than China

I don’t think so anymore - even in Europe, you’re seeing large splits. Germany might be content to follow the Americans to hell, but Ireland, Spain, and others are open about seeing the US as a much more dangerous and untrustworthy entity.

and build its global hegemony on the victory in this conflict

It also built its hubris which is now destroying it.

Not only did the US immediately set aside pretenses of international law once the USSR fell, but even the illusion of shared prosperity for US workers, who started seeing their wages stagnate and decline in the 1990s went along with it.

China is, but that’s just doing nothing and winning

Sure, it was US propaganda in some ways, but it was often much more truthful about the facts than the local government news

The Russians, after seeing their lives collapse in the 1990s, were rumored to have said something to the effect of “we always knew our government was lying about communism, so we assumed they were also lying about how bad capitalism is. Turns out they weren’t.”

Nah, it’s actually the anti-tourist squirt guns in the plain - the 19th century Brits just couldn’t understand such a superior technology when they coined the rhyme.

How else are they supposed to get houses for settlers from New Jersey?

Ironically, Dave’s entire argument has always been an idpol one. You can’t criticize him, because as a Black man (even a millionaire) he’s more oppressed than any other group.

And, like always, idpol over intersectionality is used to maintain the existing hierarchy. Guess what Dave, the leopards did eat your face.

The US empire is going down, fast. Countries that don’t decouple now will go down with it

If you like Chanel, just you wait . . .

eVeRyThINg I dOn’T lIkE iS iMpErIaLiSm

no, just Long Dong Silver

US: bombing multiple countries for decades across the world

China: has not had a war since 1979

Me, very intelligent: actually these are identical!

I mean, AI matches perfectly with some of the stuff Allende was working on before he was murdered

No, it’s not. It increases productivity. But unless that’s distributed to wages or lower prices, it doesn’t go down to non-owners.

Imperialism is selling weapons? That’s Lenin, right?

Better late than never, but yeah

I am a programmer who uses AI daily, as well as creating it.

Nobody is romanticizing jobs. The problem with AI is one of the contradictions of capitalism - businesses want to pay workers little and have rich customers.

If selling weapons is bad, I’ve got some news for you about the US you might want to sit down for . . .

Ai would be a good thing in a rational economic system.

Unemployment is only a problem for workers under capitalism.