I think the implied meaning is that it’s a very clever question and it’s unexpected for someone so young to think of it. So it’s kind of a humblebrag that their daughter is smart.

She could definitely be smart and likely isn’t dumb, but I don’t think this level of thinking is out of the ordinary for a 12 year old.

This would have been a good time to have it

“No worries I won’t touch your gf, I just wanna sit and watch while you guys have sex.”

Not necessarily. The Pixel 9P has three different microphones and they are used differently for different situations (but not all at once). All I can say is the person on the other end can’t hear me unless I turn on speakerphone.

My microphone is broken. People hear me better if I switch to speakerphone.

Who makes the rules?

Not sure if extra shitty shitpost or just spam…

In Swedish, the word for a single log of poo is “bajskorv” (literally translated: “poo sausage”).

After that final hour, respect returns to the normal amount.

I’ve dated quite a few women and had a couple of long-term relationships. They all seem reluctant to give a blowjob - it happens but rarely. I’ve never pushed it, only shown in every way I can how much I enjoy it when it does happen. My current domestic partner does it, but I probably go down on her 10-20x more often than she does me.

But it’s also kind of a general pattern that they expect me to take the initiative in sex, and they are relatively passive. One hypothesis I have is that taking too much initiative makes them feel “slutty” or that their own desirability is not confirmed enough. Maybe this is just a part of that general pattern. But what do I know.

I genuinely wonder what that’s about. Why is it so much of a sacrifice, why is it any different from giving a back rub (assuming you have good hygiene). I certainly am not bothered by going down on her - on the contrary.

Where is this so I’ll know how to avoid it please

Cause it is manually assembled. They have a blueprint if you want to do it yourself at a much lower price.

“Innocent until proven guilty” is about not prematurely judging when you don’t know the facts. It’s not about defending rapists - it’s about defending people who are possibly not rapists.

All of these are singular examples of events that are presumably violations of existing law, except the last frame which is about changing policy and affects the state’s position on all events in the future. They are not the same.

And also, the vast majority of men are in favor of criminalizing rape of any kind.

They’re competent at extracting maximum shareholder value out of each competence-hour unit, even though the amount of competence per hour is on par with the Trump administration.

Is she into you?

NIH

Also you’ll forget how to count words