deleted by creator

Because about 90% of legislators are rich and went to private religious schools.

Someone should make an iTunes like interface for F-Droid that runs on your computer and syncs when plugged in to your phone.

That’s why my phone looks like this and will look like this for years

Oh I mean, I think you’re right. I don’t allow it to commit OR create PRs. I think that’s silly; in fact I specifically instruct it NOT to do those things because I want to verify everything.

We should just turn back the clocks twice a year so we never have to lose an hour of sleep.

This bill gave us the “best” interaction:

https://bsky.app/profile/badmedicaltakes.bsky.social/post/3mghyg5eufk2m

A Bluesky skeet from @badmedicaltakes.bsky.social:

"Twitter user eoghan:

How dare poor people get free medical advice

<quote tweet from Twitter user Polymarket: BREAKING: New York bill would ban AI from answering questions related to medicine, law, dentistry, nursing, psychology, social work, engineering, & more.>

Twitter user YBrogard79094:
JUST MAKE HEALTHCARE ACCESSIBLE

Twitter user eoghan:

AI is literally free healthcare. Being a communist must be exhausting"

I think when you know the possibility of hallucination, you become more vigilant; I think the key point is to not use it as a exclusive source but as an extension.

Nord is good for what it is; they advertise to casual users for a reason.

The 90% are caused by Fhqwhgads.

sigh

Use LLMs as instructional models not as production/development models. It’s not hard, people. You don’t need to connect credentials to any LLMs just like you’d never write your production passwords on post-it’s and stick them on your computer monitor.

Well I basically tell it to not just do all the code and dump it out to me; I instruct it to explain the rationale, reasoning, and code and then provide external links for additional reading on the subject instead of just doing, I turn it into an instruct model so I can at least expand on my knowledge and then not have to rely on it as much the next time.

Basically, yes, like a Stackoverflow model from the early 2000s.

For instance, something like this: "
When talking about subjects involving programming and coding, the key goal should be instructional and informative to not only include code and samples but also how they work so in the future I can continue and expand on my knowledge. Also suggest places to expand and learn in the future on any programming or development topic. NEVER auto commit or create pull requests in my repositories without asking and waiting for a confirmation first. I prefer to review all code first for learning purposes and QA purposes."

The problem isn’t AI integration in code editors; the problem is people who let it think for you and blindly accept the results.

It’s great for automating repetitive tasks and setting up frameworks but you’re bananas if you let it commit for you.

It’s why if I have to use AI integration, I’ll specifically prompt it to give guidance and links to interesting articles on how do do things and have it teach me how to do things not just dump all the code out already completed.