If implemented, that would just ban chatbots that use large language models. It’s not a terrible idea.
What would actually happen is that so-called AI chatbot systems would try to detect if someone is from New York and then try to exclude them from receiving medical or legal advice, fail, and then get sued and then pay a small fine, over and over again forever.
This is a really bad idea.
First because healthcare is clearly being gatekept from people.
Second, because even if you go to a healthcare professional nowadays, there is no guarantee that that person is not a fucking idiot that doesn’t believe in vaccines. I can’t believe I have to actually ask people before they touch me if they believe in vaccines or not and then tell them to not come back into my room if they answer that they don’t believe in science. But that has happened and it has happened to the people I’ve taken care of and because of this now healthcare can’t be trusted.
The LLM is not any worse than that. In fact, I would say that it’s already too cautious. No way the model is ever going to tell me vaccines are bad. It’s not going to tell me to take a poison to clear Covid. It’s not going to tell me to drink bleach like the president did. It’s literally not any worse than the bullshit we are dealing with all day every fucking day.
And I’m getting to the point that if you’re a full grown human fucking being and you’re going to believe something if it tells you to drink fucking bleach or swallow a fucking lightbulb then that’s nature saying something about you.
Naw, completely disagree. If you had a calculator you knew was defective you would ban doctors and lawyers from using it.
You also seem to think that LLM is going to be inherently more accurate than a expert human. We can see with GrokAI how easy it is to manipulate an AI into saying racist white nationalist garbage. So we are not just trusting the technology but also a layer of unpredictable corporate meddling.
Why does the LLM recommend this drug but not the other one? We quickly see how a corporation could favor a certain medication due to behind the scene deals or even push a medication.
You can’t trust a black box you are not allowed to look into. Trust in a LLM at this point is pure folly.
deleted by creator
Some of the SOTA models like gemini 3 pro are getting quite good at ballpark/estimations. I have fed it multiple complex formulas from my studies and some values. The end result is often quite close and similar in accuracy how I would do an estimation myself. (It is usually more accurate then my own ones.)
Now I don’t argue there is any consciousness or magic going on. But I think the generalization that is going on is quite something! I have trained ai models for various robot control and computer vision tasks. Compared to older machine learning approaches transformers are very impressive, computationally accessible and easy to use. (In my limited experience)
deleted by creator
100% fact.
I’m a human being and I’m pretty sure I am already not allowed to give legal or medical advice to anybody in new york or any other state.
- Make laws against chatbots.
- Demand proof you are not a chatbot.
- Surveillance capitalism.
The real target here is population control.
The lawmakers, which take billionaire money by the ton, who HAVE NEVER given a shit, suddenly, NOW, they want to protect the vulnerable. Abso fucking lutely laughable on its face.
Agreed. It’s never about protection, just covert exploitation
In the US especially, medical professionals are overworked and simply don’t have the time and energy properly diagnose. If you have a more complex, chronic issue, there’s a good chance you’ll be waiting months at a time to see various specialists who are only going to spend about 10 distracted minutes thinking about your case and might not even have any useful insights, or they might misdiagnose you and make your condition worse. You basically have to do your own research and show them studies. If you’re a person of color or a woman, etc., there’s a good chance you won’t even be taken seriously. In an ideal world, it would work like it does on TV, but in the real world, it’s all about maximizing profits and the patients be damned. Sure, LLMs are unreliable, but they do at least provide ideas to research.
That’s not why people are using ChatBots, they are using Chatbots because they can’t afford healthcare.
and before we get out the tiny violins for MDs, they gatekeep the system to keep their salaries high.
Bad news folks, MDs are using ChapGPT on the sly.
they are using Chatbots because they can’t afford healthcare
Even if they do spend their limited resources on healthcare, there’s a good chance it’s going to be a waste of money.
before we get out the tiny violins for MDs
A lot of MDs are pretty useless in the first place, and that’s a big part of the problem. Maximizing the patient load doesn’t help anything. Just because someone can memorize and regurgitate information well, that doesn’t mean they’re going to be effective at their job. It’s often necessary to shop around to find someone who doesn’t suck, which is especially difficult for anyone who can’t afford it.
I don’t see how you police/enforce this. The technology is out of the bag, people will find ways to access. Do we need age/location verification for this now too? What if I’m running a local agent? I don’t agree with this.
The law would allow you to sue whoever is running the chatbot. If you run your own LLM locally and take bad advice from it, then it’s your own fault.
Walk me through how a company based and operating not in new york would be subject to any actions from this lawsuit.
I do agree it’s limited to a small scope of New York-based smaller LLMs, but if you read the news you know why exactly this bill occured - just now Mamdani gave up on a useless chatbot made with local budget by his predecessor Adams: https://www.thecity.nyc/2026/01/30/mamdani-unusable-ai-chatbot-budget/ It was indeed giving inaccurate legal recomendations on city’s website. I think the better result that can happen to that bill is it becoming a trend across cities and states as, I suspect, New York administration wasn’t the only one falling for this scam.
So who gets sued. The guy who put the chat bot on the server and is running it or the chatbot software developer themselves?
Or both?
The guy who put the chat bot on the server, and then that guy may sue the other one if applicable.
Laws like this are great for these companies. This is how they will justify removing access to useful information and putting it behind paywalls. But oh your need a prescription so now the insurance companies are involved (spoiler: they already are) and so you don’t even have access to pay out the nose for medical information.
Then when Google search has been completely replaced with AI, you won’t even be able to search for medical information.
Healthcare companies aren’t about to provide anything for free.
Most of the medical information coming up these days is garbage and you should be going to a known, reputable site and searching their database. LLMs have been trained on absolute garbage. There is nothing of value being kept from anyone here.
LLMs have been trained on absolute garbage
It depends on the LLM actually.
Specialized medical LLMs are actually very accurate.
I’m sure the quality of the LLM output does vary a lot based on the size of the scope it covers and the training data set.
However, I believe that if it were possible to get an LLM to be “quite accurate” in any context, that would make it easy to find a path to profitability for that tool, but I don’t think we have seen that materialize anywhere.
I believe that the best they can get is “more accurate” than the mean, but still not accurate enough to reliably make anyone money*.
*Nvidia notwithstanding
Moreover, until you can get the same output from the same input from an LLM consistently, the entire tech is unreliable garbage.
LLMs and chatbots should not be giving medical advice. You are afraid of the private healthcare system, not the lack of access to the most janky bandaid fix for its failures.
Neither should Wikipedia or Google. So I guess by your logic nobody should search or learn about medical conditions on a computer.
You know damn well there’s an important difference related to the confidence of a bot that has been a key problem since this whole thing started.
I guess by your logic nobody should search or learn about medical conditions on a computer.
How else would we know the TRUTH about 5G vaccines and invermectin? Or the cures of Apple Cider vinegar?
The line between medical advice and personal research is pretty freaking gray, so banning medical advice. Does that also ban talking to llms about anything that is medical adjacent?
Does medical adjacent mean personal disabilities? Drug related interests? Pet health? Stretches? Pain support?
Anything that falls under “Health, Wellness, and Fitness”?
…etc
It’s a slippery slope and we don’t need to be sliding down it
People are so vicious over this tech they would rather have disabled poor people with cancer suffer and die under inadequate care than do anything about the inadequate care. Ban the tech, but let this all go on.
If you are perfectly able and well, you can ignore all advice that isn’t perfect.
The perspective they seem to lack is frightening. The empathy they refuse to engage is massive. This is able-ism.
Tech companies are bad, but use of tech will cure and ease cancer, HIV, and chronic disease. Bring on the downvotes.
“Would rather have disabled people with cancer suffer and die…”
My guy, that’s not a lack of LLM access, it’s a completely fucked US healthcare system that forces people onto the internet because they can’t get what they need from the state, you goofy-ass weirdo.
“Would rather have disabled people with cancer suffer and die…”
Well yes of course but also restricting access to information machines doesn’t exactly help much either.
Do hallucinating LLMs, that have done such things as convince a child to commit suicide before, really count as “information machines”? The Mayo clinic website might take a single whole other braincell to read through but at least it’ll be written properly.
I mean, the fact that you consider these programs to have enough credibility to be called “information machines” is exactly why they’re so potentially dangerous.
I hate to break it to you but… they’re not really “information machines”. Google search is a better information machine.
I think you may be falling into a false dichotomy. Not only is the choice being presented a bad one, it ignores real solutions to the root problem, leaving us to argue over the crappy “band-aid” solution to it.
I believe that people needing health care should have no reason to ask a chat bot about their symptoms because they can ask a helpful doctor instead. The fact that they can’t do that is the problem, not their access or lack of it to the chat bot.
You bring a regulation - can you really enforce it?
Just have them add a disclaimer or have the hosts be liable for what their chatbots say, stop adding bureaucracy just asking to get selective prosecuted and abused.
Name checks out.
Section 230 of the dmca is designed to allow platforms to exist because people can say whatever the fuck they want. But nobody should make a machine that says things they can’t control, and if you do you need to be disciplined for such irresponsibility.
Chat bots should never give medical advice. Chat bots dispense basic, standalone factoids, like “aspirin is a pain reliever.” But they don’t know or care about dosages, comorbid conditions or whether or not you live or die, so they won’t ask follow up questions.
Fuck the hell out of this.
My brothers in christ, I’m not going to drink bleach because the chat bot tells me to. I’m trying to come up with diagnostic ideas to discuss with my doctors, and it’s invaluable for that.
then you should just be discussing your issues with your doctors in the first place?
They are stumped and so is my second opinion. In this situation, every idea is valuable.
Not every idea is valuable.
People do it when a president tells them to.
then use… google? if you do your own research you could atleast do it properly.
Not to mention if the chatbot told me to drink bleach I would be asking for deletion of data at the very least, not shrug and keep using it…
I… do? You can do more than one thing
we don’t want the plebs getting around our carefully constructed cartels…
Isn’t this just trading one cartel for another? The difference being that doctors and lawyers can be held accountable for their errors while a LLM can’t because no one actually stands behind them.
Maybe. LLMs are free(ish), meanwhile a single trip to the ER can leave a person destitute. Maybe that’s not so bad (it is) if the ER visit is for something actually urgent, but somewhere between 27% and 40% of ER visits are non-urgent and most are treatable by a PCP. But… ERs have to treat you while, in the US, a primary care physician can look you right in the eyes and turn you away because you have no money.
People don’t want to admit that AI does some good because the companies that own these LLMs are as corrupt as any other and the implications of the corruption of this tech are horrifying. But for health care, including mental health, LLMs are an unexpected godsend.
Uscher-Pines, L., Pines, J., Kellermann, A., Gillen, E., & Mehrotra, A. (2013). Emergency Department Visits for Nonurgent Conditions: Systematic Literature Review. American Journal of Managed Care. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4156292/
Raven, M. C., et al. (2024). Emergency Department Visits That Could Be Managed at Other Care Sites. JAMA Network Open. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2813806
Theoretically they can be but in practice it’s not always so easy. I prefer options. there’s already been dozens of cases of AI getting things right when Dr’s get it wrong. All trades should get the same competition.
Maybe but it’s trading one cartel for one that’s not as bad.
Which is really saying something considering how bad these companies are.
But imagine being gate kept from life because you don’t have enough money for it. Imagine going to the Doctor over and over and over again and then never be able to find fucking shit yet managing to always charge you hundreds upon hundreds upon hundreds of dollars every fucking time. Until finally over a decade later, one just randomly says oh you need this super simple drug To take for a week to clear it. Thousands upon thousands upon thousands of dollars years of suffering, and yeah, not one of them could figure it the fuck out? Until one doctor took one look at my skin and knew? But the others still were owed a paycheck for it? So yeah, it is trading one cartel for another but fuck the healthcare cartel. What the fuck did we expect to happen?
If you don’t save peoples lives and you don’t give them a way to find healthcare then you deserve what you fucking get and we are all going to suffer for this. We are all going to suffer for allowing these quacks all over the place. Selling bullshit all over the place. Telling us vaccines don’t work. Yeah It’s trading one for another, but at least one isn’t going to charge us a fucking car just to tell us to go fucking home and pass the dead baby by ourselves and to come back if it doesn’t work out so they can get another car out of me to save my life.
Yeah, I got some fucking beef with Healthcare professionals.
The idiocy I see in these comments makes me weep for humanity. Most people have NO IDEA what it’s like to need and receive medical help. So much so that they want to deny tools to the very people who need them most.
totally respect your position btw.
Hell yeah, let’s hold them accountable for disinformation. They’ll be gone completely in a matter of months.
Want to get rid of that responsibility? Direct the user to the source. Oh wait, that’s just a search engine.
It’s a bit different, because a search engine can give you 0 results. An AI is trained on getting the most correct answers so it always guesses, it’s the best way to score on an evaluation
Except for refusals, but that’s a kind of answer as well.
I think a better solution is to ban techbros from giving serious economic or cultural advice and take computers away from business majors.
Please don’t take them entirely away. Maybe just internet access? 30ish years had to do accounting by hand. In those green ledgers. It took approximately twelve times longer to do it by hand than to do it with a computer. And it made me shrimp like 5 times worse. I needed an architect’s table what angled the top of it in order to work properly but I could neither get one supplied by the employer nor afford to give one to the employer.
Not all technology is bad
found the business major!
what about a typewriter?
um, i had one. still have it in a case in the garage, next to my 1950s adding machine that sat in the corner of my cube making me look like a Real Numbers Person Tee Emm.
if i’d known my hood was going to be brown i might have reconsidered.
Oddly specific gripe, I’ll allow it.
thank you i have others in jars in the back
I don’t get how some of these tech company CEOs who came up as engineers can be pushing this bullshit. I get once the company got big they started hiring business bros. But some big companies still have CEOs that were once engineers. You’d think they would know better.
What kind of engineer? Because while the physical world, with all of its mechanical and civil and aerospace engineers, has its shit figured out with professional standards and very clearly defined responsibilities and duties, the world of social engineers, tire engineers, procurement engineers, supply chain engineers, sandwich engineers, project engineers, lead engineers, and yes, software engineers, definitely is a little too loose with any definition for me to care that these ceos were once ‘engineers.’
You can take any of these professional engineers, give them a billion dollars and they’re going to turn into total pieces of shit.
Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Would be nice if regular legal and health advice was in any way affordable though
