• Solumbran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s a more debatable thing. You’d have a necessity to not change, which makes it less immoral obviously, but it does put into perspective the question of the worth of a life, and whether a human life is worth a lifetime of meat eating/killing.

    But that’s not the case for a huge majority of people, so I would call this an edge case which is less obvious. Not everything is obviously good or bad, some areas are grey, but it doesn’t mean that some areas aren’t. Eating meat for personal pleasure/comfort is obviously immoral, once everyone aligns behind this we can start debating the edge cases.

    Also, people like you would typically be a good reason to keep on developing cellular meat, independently from vegetal alternatives to meat.

      • Solumbran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I know that most humans are not unable to survive without meat, it’s basic biology and nutrition.

          • Solumbran@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            What are you even talking about?

            Other than survival needs, nothing warrants killing and eating sentient beings, in case you were suggesting otherwise. And if you were, then your morals are completely fucked up.

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Other than survival needs, nothing warrants killing and eating sentient beings

              most people don’t do that, anyway. but you’re asserting this without evidence, so it can be dismissed without evidence as well