• Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Look at some of the long term representatives long before. Same story. That can go for both parties, btw.

      Same reason Carlin didn’t go after the politicians. There wouldn’t be a problem if the demand wasn’t there. The public sucks.

  • The Velour Fog @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Because there are a lot… A LOT of stupid/ignorant people in the world.

    I have to interact every now and then with someone who is a MrBeast stan. He’s in his 20s or 30s and has a kid of his own. He’s also a fan of xxtentacion and even when he was confronted with facts about MrBeast being a scammer and abuser, and xxtentacion beating his pregnant girlfriend, he said it was just haters making up stories. I literally linked him an NBC article about whatever current controversial shit MrBeast was up to at the time, and he said that “y’know you really shouldn’t trust .com domains.”

    Dude is a lost cause and he regularly tries to recruit others to watch MrBeast or buy his products.

    • LarryBetraitor@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t disagree with Mr Beast being a scammer and abuser, and I also don’t disagree with a domain being untrustworthy just because it’s a .com domain.

      That being said, I should point out that the news/media isn’t exactly reliable. NBC is no exception. Even if the article is true (which it most likely is), I wouldn’t blame someone for not trusting NBC.

      • The Velour Fog @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I get it that the media is captured by billionaires but my point is that I don’t think that NBC, a television network that has been around for 100 years, would put their reputation on the line to publish lies about a random wealthy YouTuber, who likely has lawyers on retainer that could sue for libel.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s not what they said though. They said a .com domain was not trustworthy. Its a disyrust of ‘mainstream’ media.

        As you yourself point out, NBC is not automatically trustworthy, but the choice of domain is not the reason why. The billionaire and corporate influence, combined with clickbait journalism is why.

        Someone not trusting NBC is fine. Someone choosing to believe that it’s fake news just because it’s mainstream media when it refers to verifiabke facts and a mainstream personality is a failure of our society to adapt to the online world. A failure of education and a failure of media control and regulation.

      • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        So basically half of internet? What a stupid stance.

        “Don’t trust half of the internet” is really not that stupid idea, although it should be much higher than half. But that approach from above is of course stupid on many different levels.

  • Happy Cat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Some don’t know, some don’t care, some agree with their actions/opinions.

    While it’s important every individual develop and maintain a moral framework, individuals rarely if ever use morality as the soul basis for day to day decisions/actions.

    The world just doesn’t operate on a solely moral basis. Some don’t consider the morality of mundane acts, some find the morality of a thing excusable/justifiable when considered, and some come to find their morals agree.

    • X@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Having read the comments section of those three to get an idea, you sum it up very well. Very many don’t care, are oblivious as to why the “charity” is played to so much (re: mrbeast), fully agree with them, and frequently enjoy them doing objectively bad that shit older people won’t, possibly out of vicariousness. They just wanna sit there and watch Ow! My balls!

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    When you say “we all know”, who are you talking about? Everybody that you know? That’s a social bubble, a self-selected subset of “everybody.”

    “Horrible” is in the eye of the beholder, and people have differing opinions on stuff. You probably like and subscribe to someone that lots of other people would consider “horrible” in turn.

  • HM King Charles III DG FD@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Apart from Logan Paul, what have they done? I don’t follow celebrity drama and stopped watching mr beast after he stopped reviewing youtube intros

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    MR beast said he "studied the algorithim and what makes youtubers/audience tic, so he made his videos accordingly targeting mainly children, plus hes selling his unhealthy snacks overseas as well, which he apparently has a fanbase with asian countries. i felt like logan felt out of the youtube sphere, thats why he pivoted maga now.

  • JakoJakoJako13@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    They’re not targeting me and you. They’re targeting kids. Their whole thing is be kid friendly enough to take advantage of that lane while still being horrible people. Kids have always had a crazy “don’t to this at home” type of influence in life. Evel Knieval. Pro Wrestling. Jackass. Now it’s these guys. They’re more insidious because their reach is way larger and easier to get. A smart person looks at them and goes ‘this is shit.’ What if you don’t know any better? What group is that? Kids.

  • Kite@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Because most people don’t know. Most people are not spending hours online doomscrolling politics, pedos and such. I’m from Mr. Beast’s area and no one here has a clue. Most of my coworkers do think a lot of his products are stupid, though.

    • criss_cross@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      My wife who is normally a pretty well read person feels that MrBeast is great and is “one of the more generous content creators “

      Some people just don’t wanna take their head out of the sand for crappy videos

      • Hazzard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean… that was stupid, top to bottom, I think all that makes him not that bright, undercuts his image, and makes his company look more idiotic than I imagined possible for something so successful, but it doesn’t really make him a bad person in the way I feel someone like Logan Paul is. It’s not on the same level as something like a crypto rug pull.

  • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m aware Mr Beast exists, but I know nothing about him. I mean, I would have assumed he is awful, because money does that to people, but I’d have nothing to back up my gut feeling.

    And I’ve never heard of KSI…

  • magiccupcake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s also not really an accident either. Their popularity is not fully natural.

    All these companies, Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, tiktok, reddit, etc are not apolitical entities, they gain by pushing right-wing content to certain demographics of vulnerable users.

    I’ve noticed that personally I can’t use algorithmic media like this because it will shove that content like that down my throat and I refuse. But not everyone has that self-awareness and introspection. And some of the content is really subtle, not enough to be noticable at first.

    Example