• Axolotl@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Tested on GPT-5 mini and it’s real tho?

    Edit: Gemini gives different results

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Bold of Gemini to imply any sort of liability for what it says. Google’s lawyers really don’t want that to be the case.

    • Spezi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Tried it in GPT 5.2 (although in German) and it also says, that walking is better.

      It also made a completely illogical sentence at the third point with two words in lowercase that should be uppercase.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Man, I really hate how much they waffle. The only valid response is “You have to drive, because you need your car at the car wash in order to wash it”.

      I don’t need an explanation what kind of problem it is, nor a breakdown of the options. I don’t need a bulletpoint list of arguments. I don’t need pros and cons. And I definitely don’t need a verdict.

      • AlfalFaFail@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        I’ll also accept sarcasm.

        “Unless you’ve successfully trained your car to follow you like a loyal golden retriever, you’re probably going to have to drive.”

        • LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          You can actually fix this in the settings there’s an option for permanent prompt tunings and you can add things like “focus on concise answers” or my favorite " i don’t need to be glazed , I don’t need to be told that it’s an insightful question or reaches the heart of the matter. Just focus on answering the question"