the photo yes but not the dress itself, take the og photo from the wiki into any photoshop with a color picker, and look at the points it marks it on the color range (it shows it between yellow and red nowhere near any blue) its gold stripes in the photo. the “white dress” parts do show up with light blue tint, it all just because of the terrible back light overexposed effect. the real dress yes is blue and black, but the photo is gold stripes with light-blueish white dress.
the photo yes but not the dress itself, take the og photo from the wiki into any photoshop with a color picker, and look at the points it marks it on the color range (it shows it between yellow and red nowhere near any blue) its gold stripes in the photo. the “white dress” parts do show up with light blue tint, it all just because of the terrible back light overexposed effect. the real dress yes is blue and black, but the photo is gold stripes with light-blueish white dress.
I wouldn’t call this “nowhere near blue”:
…
Did you pick that colour from the part that’s black IRL? Of course that won’t be blue.
Edit: Here’s the original picture with max saturation. It clearly shows the blue parts as blue:
I legitimately cannot believe people are still arguing this.
I cant believe who gave a shit in the first place.
Why is it so clearly blue and black in your screenshot?