If you haven’t seen this yet, Google is planning to require mandatory developer identity verification for all Android apps, including apps distributed outside the Play Store, taking effect September 2026. This affects every independent and open source Android developer directly.

This is not just about the Play Store. After September 2026, on any certified Android device, applications from unverified developers will be blocked by default. The only proposed bypass, the “advanced flow”, exists only as a blog post and has not appeared in any beta, dev preview, or canary release. No one outside Google has seen it.

The community has been fighting back at keepandroidopen.org:

  • Read the full breakdown of what this means
  • Sign the open letter (organisations only)
  • Contact your national regulators — contacts listed by country on the site
  • Add the countdown banner to your project

September 2026 is closer than it looks. The time to push back is now.

  • ljosalhusky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Ah, how I love my Jolla C2 with SailfishOS ❤️, and how exited I am to get the new Jolla Phone I pre ordered. ✌️🙏❤️

    • ADTJ@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Is Jolla any good now? I was using the Jolla C about ten years ago and it showed some promise but it was very clunky to use.

      Also the Android runtime was based on 4.4 which was very outdated even at the time so loads of apps didn’t work even with the Android support layer due to outdated SDK.

      I really want Linux phones to do well but that’s been my only experience so far

  • vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I get that you can get around this but there are 2 major problems I see.

    1. Google now has a flag on my phone they can control remotely to keep me from accessing the apps I want to use.

    2. Alternative app stores like F-Droid will never be any more popular than they are today. This raises the barrier to entry so much that we can effectively consider the open source phone app movement to be dead in the water.

  • Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    They’re really working hard at distancing themselves from that “Don’t be evil” motto.

    • Cyberwolf@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It is, ironically, the only phone were you can install GrapheneOS, arguably the most secure and private phone you can have today.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I never believed that shit. mostly because Google designed and developed the phone and god only knows what kind of firmware backdoors are on any of the hardware.

        besides that, any money that goes to google only fuels their thirst for power.

        • UnimportantHuman@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          You have a fair concern but I do want to say it is possible to get the phones secondhand. Even if someone does buy the phone just to install GrapheneOS then at least they only get a small purchase vs a lifetime of selling your data and continuing to profit off of them long-term.

          • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I understand that, but even if you buy it secondhand it only enables someone else to buy a new pixel at a cheaper cost to them. if they’re forced to hold their old phones because the market is stagnant, the likely result will be a drop in sales to google.

  • titanicx@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Everyone freaking out when this is actually something you would want as a consumer. 8 want to know who the fuck is making my apps, where they are from, and where my data is going. If you don’t want this. I am guaranteeing you get viruses and shit all the fucking time.

    • TheTearMiser@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      No I rightly don’t care wrote it if I can see the source code and verify where all my data is.

      If you want to know where where your apps come from then Id suggest you stop downloading from the playstore and start downloading from the sources. Get connected with the community. Learn something. It’ll be good for you

    • MrFinnbean@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nope. As a consumer i dont want one conglomerate to have power to decite what i can and cannot do on my personal device.

      It would mean they have 100% control over me as a consumer.

    • seriousslayerguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      As a consumer I want privacy and freedom, not a monopoly that controls what I can or cannot do on MY device that I bought with MY money. So up until now I installed any app that I wanted and never got any virus ever:) While you might be happy with your data going to google, I’m not.

  • Sunflier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    It just occured to me what this is all about: shutting down the ICE tracking app. They won’t carry it on the play store, but its still being shared.

    https://antifreeze.app/

    With this, you can’t get it on your phone. And, given how much Google is sucking up to tRump, they want to help him shut this down along with all the other evil.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      You can still get it, you just need to wait 24h before you can install the first app the first time, and there will be some big scary warnings.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Ya, this is their new workflow for people who dont authentic themselves.

          Turn on developer mode and choose the right setting, reboot phone, wait 24h, then you can install anything. You have the option to stay like this, or revert to 24h wait after 7 days.

          Edit: they just announced it in the past few days.

    • KuroiKaze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The governments put pressure on Google to police off play apps and harm because they are attached to Android so they’re being required to build this.

  • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Wait that’s not a thing already?

    So people can just make scam apps and once you report it to the App Store there is no recourse because even the company doesn’t know who they are?

    • deathbird@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The recourse has been removal.

      And the solution proposed is not requiring identification specifically for Play store developers, but any developer at all.

      • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Removal but no means for consumers to seek money back or damages because it’s just the Wild West?

        I think if you’re publishing an app to a public store then they should know who the fuck you are.

        • network_switch@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          This includes not in the Google play store so like f-droid or like how people would get software from a places website or GitHub or sourceforge or wherever and installing it like you can on Windows or a Mac or Linux

  • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is actually awesome. Pretty simple reason: Push more developers to Linux based phoneOS’s.

    DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS!

    They truly are responsible for the value of a platform.

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      But they did this knowing that at this point there is not a viable alternative. It’s both monopoly, vendor lock, eee and enshittification all at once…

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        by 2027 there will be a linux phone. consumers won’t put up with this shit and vendors aren’t so blind to see an opportunity.

        • smeenz@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          2127…

          2227…

          2327…

          2427…

          Surely 2527 will be the year of the Linux phone…

        • Scrollone@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          There was already a Linux phone and even a Firefox phone, but with no wide app support it’s going to be a failure, just like it happened with Windows Phone.

          And I’m saying this as a person who would love for a true Linux phone alternative to succeed.

          • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            All a Linux phone needs to succeed is an app store and to be able to securely process payments without google and then developers and companies are interested.

  • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m gonna stick to pre-owned devices with alternate ROMs like Lineage, Cyanogen, RR, Havoc, Bliss, cr, Viper, AOSP, KP, ISP, etc. or any of the other hundred brews. I don’t anticipate getting a phone that runs android and is not able to be modified EVER. Eventually if the time comes that the tech changed so vastly that they’re not usable anymore (like 3G now) by then hopefully there will be full Linux phones or some other varieties. Maybe many.

    But the thing is the mainstream masses just don’t give a shit. Their rights and liberties have been getting chewed away at for decades and they just can’t seem to care. As long as they are entertained enough and the culture like ours - ie geek subculture / hacking community continues to be mocked and vilified, they’re certainly not gonna listen to us.

    But what’s new about that? Nada.

    We are forever going to remain a fringe community and I just accept that. When a family member has Alexa devices and I show them all the analytics and tests and records from all the various sources that provide empirical evidence of constant surveillance and spying and uploading of eavesdropped audio and the folks just go eh oh well eh yeah but ah useful eh I have nothing to hide ehhh urrrgh … I start to see them with sunken eye sockets and protruding brow ridges. They are the fools and the suckers and the sheep. They’re the ones who will line up to be implanted with a chip, they’re the ones who will pay to have their brains mapped and catalogued. You can’t cure fucking stupid. Meanwhile people like us will remain the fringe “undesirables” as long as our hearts beat.

    • FG_3479@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The solution is GrapheneOS. You can install it on Google Pixels today, and Motorola is going to release some devices with official support for it in 2027.

      • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s not the single solution. You can put dozens of ROMs on dozens of other devices. I buy older devices at cheap prices and put custom ROMs on them and then sell them. It’s fairly lucrative; more so as time goes on. Plenty of people want this kind of privacy but don’t have the skills or confidence to modify their devices. Motorola and Samsung the most by far, but also LG and various others occasionally.

        • FearMeAndDecay@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah the real issue is ease of access and simplicity. GrapheneOS is appealing to me, but 1. I don’t want to buy a google pixel just to get it and 2. I don’t have the confidence to replace the OS, no matter how easy the guide says it is. If I had someone in person to help me I’d maybe consider it, but I’m just so worried I’d mess it up and brick the phone

          I was planning to get an android phone in a few months since I unfortunately still have my old iPhone, but with this GrapheneOS Motorola phone coming out in 2027 I might see if I can make this phone last till that comes out if android is gonna be locked down too

          • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I buy slightly older phone in Lots. I clean them, test them and then I change them over to a ROM that runs nicely. Then I sell them at a modest markup. I’ve sold about like twenty so far in the past year and I have about forty waiting to be finished. Due to chronic illnesses I have, I often have weeks during which I can’t make any progress.

            I know there are plenty of enthusiasts who would like to run a smoother OS that doesn’t spy on them or waste sys resources on bloatware, but oftentimes those people are afraid to do their own hack for concern they’ll mess up. That’s basically my customer base and I’ve been very happy to help get these devices to folks who want this experience.

            I like crDroid, ResurrectionRemix, BlissOS, Lineage, Havoc, /e/, Iodé, and like a dozen others such as generic AOSP based etc. There are like a hundred. I just discovered SuperiorOS I put onto a Moto X4. Superior is quite an apropos name, it’s really sweet!

            Samsung and Motorola are a smooth process (provided not restricted due to carrier or because it’s a prepay). Some LG are very good as well, but too many are not accommodating and also lots of them crap out. I do like my G4. I have about thirty devices I use somewhat regularly for this or that.

            There are plenty brands, though, that I’ve not yet tried out.

        • FG_3479@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Other ROMs are usually very bad at security with many being late to secuity updates, not supporting bootloader relocking, and not using the secure element. I would not trust them in the hands of someone who isn’t tech savvy or is at high risk of hackers.

  • Reality_Suit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Graphene os announced a partnership with Motorola. My next phone will be a Motorola with Graphene OS.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      My next phone will be a Motorola with Graphene OS.

      I’m thinking maybe my next phone is a dumb phone that can only make calls and maybe text. They still make those, right?

    • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      People don’t get it: it doesn’t matter Graphene or LineageOS. Its still Android and will still be bound to the same limitations, unless you go fully degoogled which means give up on internet banking, cardless payments and government apps. (And much more like m Donalds app and more… But I don’t care for those)

      We need open trust platform not one controlled by Google, Graphene or lineage are just not valid alternatives. We need a Linux phone.

      • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        What about fairphone? A friend has one and choose the “no google” when she bought it. Works kind of apparently.

        • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Ask you friend if the McDonald app works out of the box.

          I know, I don’t care for McDonald app as well, but it’s an easy example of a stupid app requiring play certification to work…

      • Ben@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        We need a Linux phone.

        For now a linux phone will still lack native banking apps, cardless payment and government apps. Unless the app can run on a degoogled OS (Graphene, waydroid, etc.).

        By open trust platform do you mean something akin to play protect?

      • MynameisAllen@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        This is the route I’ve gone, also if you think any bank, or government is going to suddenly support a Linux phone I’ve got bad news

        • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Given an open certification process anybody could apply and achieve that, at least in theory. Something that with play integrity you cannot being obscured and proprietary.

          So who knows, maybe one day even a Linux phone could. But not unless we get an open certification approach.

      • Yliaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        People should just stop being so addicted to convenience.

        Quit internet banking and cardless payments.

        • mesa@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          For me its maps. Getting directions is mostly why im still on /e/. I would love a linux phone! But im stuck at the moment.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Well, FairPhone has GPS support on Ubuntu and that opens the world to a bunch of native GPS apps

            Note that I haven’t tested this, I’m an iOS user, but Linux with Fairphone is starting to sound better and better. I moved from Android to iOS because Android started feeling so restrictive compared to what it used to be in the single digit version numbers era, it stopped making sense to prefer it over the more convenient OS. Now it seems Linux on certain phones is starting to get usable enough that it can be what Android used to be a decade ago when I still liked it.

              • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Do let everyone know if you do, I think there’s actually quite a few people here who’d be willing to make the change to Linux if the Fairphone is truly as well supported as the UBPorts website claims

                • mesa@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  100%. I have one app for work that i also need. Do you happen to know if two oses can work on a phone? Like grub allows?

        • guy@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Quit internet banking? That’s the only form of banking available when the banking offices only have open on every other Tuesday, during the full moon between 11-12:30, closed for an hours lunch.

        • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I don’t care for cardless payments, but I do use internet banking, you cannot do without at least here, and government apps too are useful and doing with out is just… Impossible.

          Mobile banking is mandatory here, if not able to do mobile banking then you can use non free SMS messages, which sucks.

          Government apps mandatory I mean that without, you are cut from most digital government services, which is not practical at all. Survivable, but a pain.

          • Yliaster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            You say non free SMS messages as if it’s otherwise “free”, but the product is you.

            Utility or privacy, it’s your pick. If you value privacy more, you won’t give in to utility.

            Government apps are the only one I think are hard to do without.

            • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              You talk of what you don’t know. Bank apps here are mandatory by law. If you don’t or can’t use a bank app then you can use a SMS verification approach where you are required to PAY SMS that the bank sends you.

              Receiving SMS here is free, only those from the bank for verification are to be paid without the bank app, it’s just a scam to force you to use the bank app.

              The bank app itself is not a scam like a you are the service approach, and it’s not free either as you pay the bank services with your bank account fees already. Maybe you don’t pay a specific fee for the app, bit you already pay your home banking fees anyway.

      • seang96@spgrn.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Graphenes is degoogled and can support play services in a locked down environment so it doesn’t have full control of your entire system. Play services is what is expected to be used to do the verification process.

        • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          This is a totally unrealted point. This applies to the age verification requirements and not the freedom to install apps outside Google control

      • skyline2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Graphene isn’t a ROM, it is a standalone mobile OS based on the Android Open Source Project. So yes, Google primarily develops it, and has de-facto control. But Graphene is actively working to change that, especially with partnering with OEMs so that they can increase device driver support and give more devs incentive to work on AOSP/Graphene in general. For mobile devices the device drivers are huge, unlike desktop/server linux where MOST (obviously not all) things work.

        • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I beg to defer on the device drivers. Maybe you don’t remember, but it’s been decades before Linux would adapt, reimplement or convince manufacturer to provide drivers for it.

          Modems first. Graphics card next. Wi-Fi networks also. Winprinters. They all come to my mind. And it’s only by time and effort that now looks just works everywhere.

          And now while graphene indeed is doing a great job that I appreciate very much, at the same time they are not developing an operating system. Google is.

          There is a huge effort behind developing a full operating system, and it also requires standardization and somebody who defines what the standards are.

          At this point, Google is the only one doing that. And if they go closed doors, no open source AOSP clone could keep up with Google changing standards and still be compatible, which would end up as an incompatible operating system.

          My point is that currently Android needs Google, and there is no fooling around. We are years away of being independent from Google, whatever the great effort other developers are doing.

          I appreciate everybody’s work and I have been a lineage supporter and maintainer myself.

          There are tons of issues that we need to solve to be really independent from Google. Forking he’s the least of those.

      • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        WTF are you talking about?

        will be bound by the same limitations

        It’s based on AOSP (open source). They can easily fork Android and do whatever they want. Open source means full control over software / OS.

        Starting from scratch has zero benefits, and only means the experience is shitty and app ecosystem is nonexistent.

        give up on internet banking…

        And those apps which require hardware verification using Google APIs are available on Linux? How does this equate to “we need a Linux phone”?

        The issue, as you said, is “we need an open trust platform”. The best path forward is we push for that so that Graphene and anyone else can us it.

        Giving up all the open source work and app ecosystem of Android is irrelevant and only prevents 99.999℅ of people from adopting it.

        • xvapx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          They’re not wrong.
          Of course you can fork and have full control over your fork, but Graphene and company want to be able to keep merging AOSP’s code to keep up with features and improvements.
          Merging code from a divergent codebase is harder the more divergence there is, and with big codebases it can easily overwhelm small and medium-sized teams.
          It’s the same reason there aren’t lots of chromium forks with manifest v2 support, while it is technically feasible, it requires a bigger effort than most projects can afford.
          Keeping an open AOSP fork is not a bad idea, but it’s not clear whether GrapheneOS or any other project will be able to keep up with that workload.
          Of course Linux phones require a lot of work too, but it’s work oriented towards making it work instead of towards undoing whatever sabotage google ads to AOSP, so it might motivate more people or be easier to do.
          Also, both approaches are compatible.
          Linux phones can use waydroid, which depends on AOSP, to run Android apps.

        • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I am sorry to say that forking AOSP is not an easy solution.

          I cannot talk for Grafene as I don’t know much of that organization, but I have been part of the Lineage Os organization for a little bit as a maintainer, and I can tell you that nobody is actually able to start working on such an effort as an AOSP fork.

          I would gladly be happy if such a work would actually be maintained and supported long time, but I’m skeptical that anybody but a big organization has a power and a resource is to do so. After all even Linux is actually brought along by lots of organizations and also commercial organizations.

          Yes, we need an open source trust platform, and I believe that is the only real way forward. I would vouch for a Linux mobile operating system, but indeed, air truly open, Android would be good as well.

      • ricdeh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I see this take repeated again and again it is simply not true. LineageOS and other FOSS AOSP-derivatives are the best, most-supported and most-accepted FOSS mobile operating systems that we have available to us. And no, you neither have to give up on contactless payments nor on internet banking or government apps. There are many applications that don’t play nice with FOSS Android, but if you make the effort to choose your service providers with intent, so that they are compatible, then it is very much possible to daily-drive a fully de-Googled phone.

        • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I agree with most of everything you wrote.

          But banking apps and government apps is not a convenience, is a requirement, especially because, well, by law, they are required to provide an app and there is no choice around it. At least here.

          I could indeed go back to bicycle everywhere I want to go and take in the train, but that is not convenience, that is life, so I need a car.

          My point is that Google controls Android, whether they graciously allow us to have our foss Android and recompile it from sources is nice, but we still depend on Google and this is not good.

          This is what needs to change, and there is no way around it.

    • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I hope Motorola comes out with a Graphene-compatible phone before September.

      What other recourse do we have if they don’t?

      e/OS on a Fairphone? Sony Xperia?