We(Lemmy users) are adblock users and are tired of capitalism that ruined Reddit.
All of us didn’t come here to look at ads again or to entertain capitalist dreams of embedding ads everywhere.
My recommendation is clear, let’s ban watermarked comics and work towards ad free community.
At the end, music don’t have watermarks and neither do art. So why should comics have watermarks?
Linking to the source should be the primary way of attribution.
This is hands down the most brain dead take I’ve seen today. Congratulations, you’re wrong more than anyone else! 🎉
How is the post about not cropping the artists signature relevant here?
The discussion there is relevant to the topic actually.
How
If I enjoy a creator, I want to see more of their work.
With people like you, I would have no idea who Neil Kohney even is.
Fuck you in particular.
… Isn’t supporting and highlighting smaller creators rather than huge megacorps kinda a core part of the anti-capitalist movement?
Do you think seeing the author’s name on the front of a book is also an ad?
😂
While we could enforce the rule of link being the attribution, as a general rule it’s not what will happen when someone shares anything on the Internet. It will be ripped out of context and posted on random places with zero attribution.
Exhibit A: yourself. Your post history does only occasionally contain links.
I avoid it because a lot of times the source is Reddit or Instagram.
But if the rule enforced, I would attribute back everything. Because it became agreed upon this compromise basically.
In short, I would link back even if to Reddit. But we need to have a standard here to kick ads out before I do that.
So… you fully admit that you could do the right thing, but just won’t?
yeah I remember when they gave me a contract i put my watermark on with an ad of my brand (sometimes called full name).
idiot.
Upvoting to promote conversation, but wholeheartedly disagree. Artists have a right to sign their work, and separating an artist’s signature from their art is douchy behavior.
At the end, music don’t have watermarks
You don’t listen to hip hop. They have producer tags, and I think some electronic musicians might do it too.
Plus digital music absolutely has metadata built into the file.
Did the copyright holder (i.e. the artist) give you permission to redistribute their work without attribution? If not, it’s a copyright validation and illegal in most countries.
I’m not really against pirating (you would copy a car), if you are taking from the rich. But that’s not the case here.
And holding back information about the source of the comic is just evil to the readers here.
Are you puppeting your bot account right now so that you can evade a ban?
Genuinely asking because this is just like. The worst take ever, but the time frame between the number of posts you post per day and the fact that there was a post recently about bots not being allowed all make me suspect everything you’ve said.
Keep suspecting then.
I won’t entertain you for free.
Do bad faith arguments with yourself.
Is it advertising when I sign my tax return? Enquiring minds want to know. Cause I sure as hell would love it if the IRS didn’t know who I was or how much money I was making.
no one should change artwork unecessearily without the artists permissions. I rather have more content than not. I actually don’t block ads all the time and don’t mind well regulated capitalism. Lots of use of all and we like its a 100% thing.
Easily one of the worst takes I’ve ever seen.
You are against capitalism, and your approach is to remove author attribution, thus fucking small creators. That’s called punching down, and for being so against capitalism, you operate like a good dog.







