• Kacarott@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t think It’s that clear, are eggs named by what created them, or what they contain? I could certainly see an argument that the first chicken hatched from a proto-chicken egg

    • Kraiden@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ok, but does it matter what it’s called? If it contains a modern chicken, and it’s an egg, whether it’s a chicken egg, or a proto chicken egg is debatable. But the egg definitely came first

      • Kacarott@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not if we are specifically asking about whether the chicken or the chicken egg came first (which is what the original comment in this chain implied), because if proto-chickens lay proto-chicken eggs and a chicken was hatched out of one, then the chicken came before the chicken egg

        • Kraiden@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sure but that’s changing the question, the original question is “which came first, the chicken or the egg” not “the chicken or the chicken egg” so the answer to the question, as posed, is definitely: the egg

          • Kacarott@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            ??? You yourself said “even if we are talking about chicken eggs, it is still the egg first” and I was making a point against that.