If you can’t see the difference between being forced to work and have sex with a single man, who you are stuck with without the possibility of divorce, and the general need to work for one of any number of employers? I’m sorry. But you’re willfully ignorant and beyond reaching.
Now women are dependent on an employer instead.
That just means the struggle isn’t over, not that the struggle was pointless.
how does fighting for the right to work reduce the dependency on an employer?
It doesn’t. It means that fighting to reduce our dependency on employers is part of the next step.
who to be dependent on instead? or do you want to grow your own corn in your back yard?
If you can’t see the difference between being forced to work and have sex with a single man, who you are stuck with without the possibility of divorce, and the general need to work for one of any number of employers? I’m sorry. But you’re willfully ignorant and beyond reaching.
yeah i see it. i was just trying to get it properly formulated out, so it can be properly discussed and people can read and think about it.
I believe the correct term for employers is “pimp.”