Well yeah, the frog has been around. The name Wolverine frog is more recent than that though. More frequently it’s called a hairy frog.

Actually, the name wolverine frog is a direct reference to the comic book character.

I’m teaching you a lesson by giving you business, then finger wagging at you.

Don’t worry. Persecuting christians is super easy. You just have to be gay and exist.

But not cartilaginous fish. That’s where I draw the line.

I was more thinking “The lane you’re supposed to be using is blocked by a bunch of parked cars”

I mean, I don’t see bows on young boys things. I see them on women’s things and young girl’s things. The connection is to femininity, not childhood.

If I’m not mistaken, bows used to be a lot more common on (rich) men’s clothing. But, similar to the high heel, has mostly fallen out of fashion in masculine fashion.

They aren’t a common decorative element in mens things (unless you count like, bow ties), and work boots generally don’t have decorative elements at all. But they’re still a pretty common decorative element, outside of use for children.

This feels like an analogy for bike lanes.

The

Spray paint

Even worse they COULD make trucks that do everything new trucks do without being so huge. Kei trucks would do most of what people use American trucks for.

Hell, American trucks used to do everything modern ones do at half the size.

Honestly, requiring a separate license for larger vehicles would probably be more effective. It’s already pretty common to have separate licenses for different classes of vehicles.

Make it require a more rigorous driving test, and maybe more expensive too. We should probably also outlaw consumer vehicles with such shit visibility anyway, but that’s a different issue.

2/10 ragebait. Keep trying, you’ll do better one day.

Ehhh, kinda? There was a group of non-benders who saw benders as oppressive. But their leader was secretly a water bender who was basically using them, and they’re mostly just portrayed as “Crazed revolutionaries who are going too far!”

You weren’t really encouraged to empathize with them or see the world from their point of view.

I mean, his death is not his own fault, and I’m not trying to say otherwise. This was murder, plain and simple. But kicking the car was still stupid, pointless and dangerous. Encouraging other people to follow this guy’s example is pointless, stupid, and dangerous.

Well, choosing not to kick cars that belong to clearly dangerous people has never gotten me shot.

Honestly, I think choosing to move on is absolutely the best course of action. Kicking the car in some act of vengeance, or expression of (even justified) anger isn’t going to make things better but it might make things worse. That bullet could’ve hit anyone in the vicinity, and even if dude hadn’t pulled a gun, the car he was driving is just as deadly and has plenty of potential for collateral damage.

Like I agree with you that the shooter definitely shouldn’t be driving with that mental state of his, but just because he’s in the wrong doesn’t make it right to escalate things such that everyone around you is in danger too.

Ehh, combustion is just slow explosions.

I’d actually recommend you don’t.

Not defending the shooter, he definitely had a severe over reaction to the situation. But dude had no fucking survival instincts. Why would you kick the 2 ton box of metal, powered by explosions and driven by someone who clearly doesn’t care about your safety? In the land driveby shootings no less.