QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agotype shitsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square272linkfedilinkarrow-up1995arrow-down125
arrow-up1970arrow-down1imagetype shitsh.itjust.worksQuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square272linkfedilink
minus-squareTheThunderWolf@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoYes but it shouldn’t be done to infants because they did not and cannot consent. You can’t know whether the infant will come to see it as mutilation. And it is irreversible.
minus-square[deleted]@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months ago Yes but it shouldn’t be done to infants because they did not and cannot consent. I have already expressed 100% support of banning non-medically necessary circumcisions.
Yes but it shouldn’t be done to infants because they did not and cannot consent.
You can’t know whether the infant will come to see it as mutilation. And it is irreversible.
I have already expressed 100% support of banning non-medically necessary circumcisions.