• kadotux@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    phew, feels like I jumped the ship just in time. Installed PostmarketOS on my Fairphone a couple of months ago, and I’m not looking back.

      • kadotux@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I feel like it was in the sweet spot for me as I was looking for a “true”(i.e. non-android) linux phone, and I happened to have a FP4, which I bought years ago. I don’t see many other options for this device, other than ubuntu touch. I tried it like a year+ ago, and it was nice, but it lacked userspace drivers for wireguard and while it was officially listed as issue somewhere in github/gitlab/wherever the development was, the development seemed really slow, almost stagnant. And I rely heavily on wireguard in my homelab setup, so that was a deal breaker for me.

    • matlag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You do whatever you want, but out of curiosity: how is that helping with this issue in anyway?
      pmOS does not have Google Play nor the Apple equivalent. GOS has the option of having a sandboxed Google Play.

    • neo2478@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Which Fairphone, and how’s it working for you?

      I have the FP6 with e/os right now. It works pretty well, but I am against some decisions from Murena (like using OpenAI for voice recognition)

      I’m looking forward to switching ROMs when there is more support for the FP6

      • kadotux@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Fairphone 4. It’s working out decently enough for me. To be clear, some features are still broken (most crucially phone audio, which only works via headset), speakers altogether started working just a couple of months ago in edge branch. Camera kinda works, but it takes just horrible pictures. Broken if you ask me. I like the “feel” i have with it, it no more feels like I’m carrying a spying device in my pocket, but a computer instead. There are drawbacks, like I have to do my banking old school, visiting the bank site via browser, but they are worth it for me. My phone screen time has definitely shortened. It’s more quiet now.

      • kadotux@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I’ll paste my other response:

        Fairphone 4. It’s working out decently enough for me. To be clear, some features are still broken (most crucially phonecall audio, which only works via headset), speakers altogether started working just a couple of months ago in edge branch. Camera kinda works, but it takes just horrible pictures. Broken if you ask me. I like the “feel” i have with it, it no more feels like I’m carrying a spying device in my pocket, but a computer instead. There are drawbacks, like I have to do my banking old school, visiting the bank site via browser, but they are worth it for me. My phone screen time has definitely shortened. It’s more quiet now.

        edit: and you can do cool stuff with it, with root access by default! I have signal-cli running as a systemd service, which connects to my matrix signal bridge :)

        edit2: funny story about the mentioned signal-cli. I had to put the phone in the fridge, because otherwise while compiling it (had to be compiled, no packages available) hit the critical temp threshold and shut down. :D Felt kinda funny. 2026, phones compiling in the fridge.

  • meowmeow@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Can we trust that isn’t a campaign to promote Google? What are these websites? Why aren’t they blocking an iPhone? Can any of that be replicated or is this just a Google campaign to create fear and doubt

    • s38b35M5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      And nothing of value was lost. I’m over social media, over commercial apps, and maybe I’m over having a mobile phone, too.

    • Tore@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That would make the two of us. My Fairphone 3+ is still kicking well with /e/OS.

    • comrade_twisty@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      What they are doing is way worse tban what you understood.

      These QR codes will show on your Desktop PC and you will need an Android phone or an iOS device with a logged in Google QR code app to get past it.

      • kalpol@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I wouldn’t scan shit from a website. Random QR codes are a security risk. Just won’t visit that website.

        • comrade_twisty@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s why you have to use the special google app that will protect you from all these dangers*

          *and also collect all your data, sell it to advertisers and forward it to US surveillance agencies (for your own protection of course).

          • FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Sad thing is, that argument works against so many ppl. “I can trust this app. It’s from Google!”

            We(*) are tearing down personal computing. Brick by brick. The very idea of controling our own devs is getting lost. Replacing with Big Tech Feudalism.

            (*) Not most of us here. But in the whole pop.

      • fartographer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I am in no way condoning Google’s behavior, nor am I trying to normalize it. With that out of the way: maybe running Android Studio with an AVD might be a decent workaround. For now…

      • Phantaloons@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Guess I’m not going to Youtube, then.

        I see a future where we have our mandated government ID shitphone for banking, corpo and government suchn’shit, and the laptop we access Anna’s, Yggdrasil and TOR with.

        and the days go by!

        Not exactly same as it ever was, but seems kinda 2007 to me. I doubt any Lemmy instance or i2p site will enforce Google’s QRcode spy-proxy.

        • freebee@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s not 2007. Devices are everywhere now, smartphones, TV’s etc. The social dimension (social pressure) and implications are very different now. Their power increases, amount of people caught in the loop is immense now. 2007 was all still fun and games.

          • Phantaloons@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Undoubtedly, and more still will be as corporate greed turns the internet into pay-per-view TV. We can’t help that.

            Make your decision for yourself for what to do with your connections and your own devices. You are in control of at least that, if nothing else.

        • ferrule@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          My current GraphineOS phone will probably be my last smartphone. I’ll be moving to a dumb phone and a data hotspot connected to some type of cyberdeck. Will have that thing locked down, blocking known abusive companies like Google. Honestly could care less about using any service that touches them.

        • FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Ayup that has been the holy grail of big tech.

          They are most of the way there today. Make Identity Resolution inescapable. Bing bang boom.

          It is more than just phones and lappys too. It’s everything. That smart TV. That fitness watch. That automobile. That streaming music service. The ebook reader you got as a birthday gift.

          Your behavior across every single device is data gold. This is today’s reality.

          • Lemmayng@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yep, data gold to sell to data brokers and investors so they can sell you shit that you don’t need and can’t even afford.

  • ISOmorph@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    That would only make me install Graphene even harder if I wasn’t already writing from a phone with it

    • Pirate2377@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Hopefully this will push Linux Mobile development so that we are no longer completely bound to Android or iOS

  • naughtysnake@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    So what’s your plan? Using your fully-googled device instead of using a slightly-googled phone with Play Services?

    • Batmorous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      And forced to open-source their OS’es. And have to make their communities owned by the people instead of corpos. We are all beyond pissed and done with their shit. Everyone get more people on board into the movement daily to be focused on getting things done together!! Keep each other in the fight with online and in-person communities

    • bagsy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Every company that uses these captcha service should also be fined so hard. This isnt just google here.

      • jafra@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        And every company that is relying on gsm or the apple pendant to verify anything.

  • greedytacothief@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m not a security guy, what is the problem that this is supposed to be fixing? Like I guess you wouldn’t be able to use a virtuallised os to visit your banking website? Like I understand if you work for a bank you should only be able to access some things from specific computers, but normal people?

    • lemonwood@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The benefit is for Google to make more profits if people are locked into their “ecosystem” without competition driving the prices down.

    • jabberwock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s intended to be a successor to the current reCAPTCHA, sold as harder to spoof than current picture-based versions. Now, almost from its start, CAPTCHA existed to train AI vision models. So Google basically painted themselves into a corner using free labor to train models good enough to recognize images, now they are switching to device signals.

      That said, they’re going to have to provide a compatibility layer for iOS which AFAIK doesn’t come with Google Play Services right now. So I have some faith in the smart folks who make these de-shittified OSes working something out via microG or the like.

      • ruby@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        iOS has their own attestation/anti-tamper api similar to google’s integrity api so that’s going to be used instead. the only difference is that on iOS you’ll need to download extra software specifically for this.

        graphene devs said you can do it with their sandboxed version of gms but as far as i know that still involves having an account and handing over all your personal info to google.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’re claiming it security authentication.

      Realistically, it’s keeping people in their walled garden.

      You can use a web browser on a Linux computer and get right through, this change is to force people to only run latest generation google products.

      This would also block people from using real google phones over a certain age where they cannot upgrade the OS anymore.

      • FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Realistically, it’s keeping people in their walled garden.

        I felt for a long time, “trusted computing” is such a doublespeak term. It gets avg ppl to think “Oh ofc i want to trust my device! Who wouldn’t want that?”

        Ofc what it really does, is gives BigTech the final control over everybody’s dev.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          It started out promising. Keep malicious things from changing your firmware or disk without permission. But the tools were never open enough to let you do it. So it only became trusted for those who paid into it.

  • xorollo@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    To anyone not switching because of this-- in my experience this is something I can work around. On most websites my captchas still work. I have had a few that dont work, and I just close the website and move on. It hasn’t happened on any websites that are very important for me to visit. Usually its a store and they really me to install their stupid app. Nope.

  • NGC2346@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    So i just checked back a day later after posting this and it blew up more than i expected. I’ve gotten some comments suggesting its not really preventing GrapheneOS from being usable, so this might need more context. Do your own research and testing on this one for sure, as with most things. Sorry for not answering comments, quite busy right now.

    • u/CaperGrrl79@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean when you’re paying $260 to $300+ for even a used Pixel (8 is the oldest one supported till 2029 I think), that can be a hell of an investment to make if the thing is nerfed from alternate OSs.

  • blinfabian@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    i havent noticed anything? except youtube being slow as always i supposr (/e/os user)

    • Freakazoid@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      YouTube is slow because a .js script that put a 5 sec artificial delay in time for using adblockers on the site.

      Yt implemented it a while back.

  • GMac@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    You can still go graphene and isolate play services in a secondary profile.

    For a better future: Organisations and services that structure themselves to require third party services need to take contractual responsibility for the actions in their fulfillment supply chain, just as an online retailer takes responsibility for delivery agents. Google play services harvesting needs to be reflected in the privacy policy of every company that doesn’t provide alternative access.

    Wonder what will happen if we all start making data protection complaints about enforced non contractual third party data harvesting?