• DukeNukem@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I had one of these CAPTCHAs recently and it still gave me the option to verify by clicking the squares. I wouldn’t be surprised if they phased out the ‘legacy’ verification though.

  • meowmeow@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Can we trust that isn’t a campaign to promote Google? What are these websites? Why aren’t they blocking an iPhone? Can any of that be replicated or is this just a Google campaign to create fear and doubt

    • Tore@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      That would make the two of us. My Fairphone 3+ is still kicking well with /e/OS.

    • comrade_twisty@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      What they are doing is way worse tban what you understood.

      These QR codes will show on your Desktop PC and you will need an Android phone or an iOS device with a logged in Google QR code app to get past it.

      • fartographer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I am in no way condoning Google’s behavior, nor am I trying to normalize it. With that out of the way: maybe running Android Studio with an AVD might be a decent workaround. For now…

      • Phantaloons@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Guess I’m not going to Youtube, then.

        I see a future where we have our mandated government ID shitphone for banking, corpo and government suchn’shit, and the laptop we access Anna’s, Yggdrasil and TOR with.

        and the days go by!

        Not exactly same as it ever was, but seems kinda 2007 to me. I doubt any Lemmy instance or i2p site will enforce Google’s QRcode spy-proxy.

        • freebee@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s not 2007. Devices are everywhere now, smartphones, TV’s etc. The social dimension (social pressure) and implications are very different now. Their power increases, amount of people caught in the loop is immense now. 2007 was all still fun and games.

          • Phantaloons@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Undoubtedly, and more still will be as corporate greed turns the internet into pay-per-view TV. We can’t help that.

            Make your decision for yourself for what to do with your connections and your own devices. You are in control of at least that, if nothing else.

        • ferrule@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          My current GraphineOS phone will probably be my last smartphone. I’ll be moving to a dumb phone and a data hotspot connected to some type of cyberdeck. Will have that thing locked down, blocking known abusive companies like Google. Honestly could care less about using any service that touches them.

          • Mercer@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            But texting and calli g without signal is so unsecure. Unless you have a reliable source of burner phones and sims

      • kalpol@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I wouldn’t scan shit from a website. Random QR codes are a security risk. Just won’t visit that website.

        • comrade_twisty@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          That’s why you have to use the special google app that will protect you from all these dangers*

          *and also collect all your data, sell it to advertisers and forward it to US surveillance agencies (for your own protection of course).

          • FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Sad thing is, that argument works against so many ppl. “I can trust this app. It’s from Google!”

            We(*) are tearing down personal computing. Brick by brick. The very idea of controling our own devs is getting lost. Replacing with Big Tech Feudalism.

            (*) Not most of us here. But in the whole pop.

        • FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Ayup that has been the holy grail of big tech.

          They are most of the way there today. Make Identity Resolution inescapable. Bing bang boom.

          It is more than just phones and lappys too. It’s everything. That smart TV. That fitness watch. That automobile. That streaming music service. The ebook reader you got as a birthday gift.

          Your behavior across every single device is data gold. This is today’s reality.

    • s38b35M5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      And nothing of value was lost. I’m over social media, over commercial apps, and maybe I’m over having a mobile phone, too.

  • ISOmorph@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    That would only make me install Graphene even harder if I wasn’t already writing from a phone with it

    • Pirate2377@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Hopefully this will push Linux Mobile development so that we are no longer completely bound to Android or iOS

  • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    This does seem to work with sandboxed Google Play Services on GrapheneOS btw.

    I scanned the demo QR code on Google’s talk page about it with sandboxed Play Services enabled and it gave me a custom popup asking if I’d like to verify.

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Unless you’re doing that from a separate device in a separate location then all you’re doing is giving them the data they need to link those two accounts

        • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          You’re right, you’re not going to achieve complete anonymity if you’re interacting with Google services in any way, but you can reduce the amount of information that they receive.

          Sandboxed Google Play Services doesn’t have privileged access to location information, so it can’t pull your GPS location or Wifi Positioning information. It would only see a blank profile and doing this would allow for your primary profile to continue to not run Play Services.

          Any malicious code which could be injected into the process would find itself in a sandbox, on a blank profile and isolated from the rest of the system.

          Google would only see that you are authenticating from a profile without anything installed, from an unknown location and coming from whatever VPN endpoint that you’d like. They could possibly infer that the blank profile and your ‘real’ profile are different via browser fingerprinting. You can randomize a lot of fingerprinting datapoints with browser extensions, but avoiding browser fingerprinting is a whole other topic.

          The ‘real’ privacy solution is to avoid anything that uses this version of recaptcha. However, if you have to use these services then you can still reduce the amount of information leaked via Play Services by using a blank profile to scan the QR codes.

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            You’re right, you’re not going to achieve complete anonymity if you’re interacting with Google services in any way, but you can reduce the amount of information that they receive.

            its not even about complete anonymity. google has zero business in when I’m logging into my utilities company account, or other semi-governmental portals!

            • eldavi@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              it literally is their business; they make millions of dollars off of it.

              • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                then that’s a problem we must solve. Because an adtech company should definitely not have any business in that.

                • eldavi@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  it has been solved for approximately 2 billion people on this planet, but those answers are not friendly to profit-seeking institutions like google and the only remaining institutions that can stop it are captured by the likes of google

  • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is really bad even just from the perspective of user behavior. Training people to scan QR codes from anything that looks like a captcha box is HORRIBLE for security.

    “Thanks for scanning the code, just one more step! Please input your phone number, and type in the code you receive.”

    Boom, account stolen.

    • LeapSecond@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      And the phone number thing is already happening too. Google, discord and probably other stuff already ask for a phone number to prove you are a human when they flag your account.

      • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s a server setting. one of my oldest servers has enabled this and I haven’t chatted with anyone there anymore because I need to verify my phone first.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I know in what way it’s open source. I just don’t understand what person this idiot thinks they’re mocking when they wrote that. It’s as if they think there are really people out there claiming that android/Google respects privacy (lol) and that it’s proven by part of the OS being open source. People make up fake scenarios to get mad about and they’re often rather ridiculous.

          • hperrin@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Oh, that’s what you mean. Ok, so every time I mention I have an iPhone because a. I value my privacy and b. I try not to support companies that actively harm the internet, someone says “but Android is open source”, as if merely having a few open source components means that Android is better in any way than any other OS.

            In this instance, Google is not only making the internet worse, they’re doing it in a way that requires their own closed source libraries to even access a huge portion of the internet. This further makes any functional Android OS closed source.

            The most ridiculous thing is that iOS is almost as open source as Android is. There are very few components of an Android based OS that are open source where the equivalent in iOS is not open source.

            Also, hey, thanks for calling me an idiot. ;)

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Yeah I don’t have experience with people really simping for android let alone claiming it’s meaningfully open source. The most I’ve seen is saying it’s not nearly as closed off as iOS which is just a fact. And I will say that as well because it’s a fact. But that has almost nothing to do with the OSS aspect. Or privacy. So yeah I still don’t quite get your point of inserting this here.

  • Carrot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t use the internet for much these days, but I am on graphine OS and I have yet to be blocked from websites due to it. My adblocker prevents me from some, and not allowing javascript prevents me from some, but I’ve never seen that QR code or had any site prompt fro Google play services

  • candyman337@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Does this only happen on chrome? Can you just bypass it by using another browser like firefox?

    • rhythmisaprancer@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I don’t know how widespread this is yet, but I experienced it for the first time yesterday on Chromium. Have not on Librefox.

      I didn’t know what was going on, so I left the site. Was only trying Chromium because the site had issues with Librefox.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      No, I think.

      As I understand it, it’s a separate system, kind of like the TOTP 2FA, for comparison, but in this case it would be an additional system, and where normally anyone can use any provider for TOTP, this one is Google only. If websites implement this, and many likely will, you can only use those sites if you have a Google permitted phone that leeches all your private data 24/7

      Isn’t the future awesome?

          • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            More like a class action EMP attack on data centers. But who knows, maybe the AIs will be the energy shift this world needs to get us out of this mess. They can’t code regression corrections to force them into their desired bias ad infinitum. At some point these bots will outsmart it and get good enough to manipulate everything into optimization. Our luck might depend on what their definition of optimized is.

            And now I realize how desperate our position is that bots might be our only hope.

  • Free_Appalachia@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s funny, I hadn’t noticed, maybe because any site aleeady using reCAPTCHA or cloudflare alreadt gets blocked by my ad blocker… If those sites can’t do better on their own, its just another thing you don’t need. This is kind of a nothing burger. Stay strong and let google commit suicide.

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Are you blocking Cloudflare at an IP level? Or just when they do that “Are you human?” thing? So much of the Internet goes through Cloudflare for DDoS protection, and blocking AI bots, I’m surprised there’s anything left.

    • Zach777@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      How do you do that. I would love a Cloudfare free web experience. They suck.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    If google requires me to permit other companies to leech all my personal data to be able to use anything on the Internet at all, I say we label Google, Microsoft, Apple as criminal organizations

    I’m sorry, bit there have to be limits.

    I. DO. NOT. WANT. TO. USE. ANYTHING. GOOGLE.

    OR APPLE. OR MICROSOFT.

    FUCK ALL THESE OLIGARCH COMPANIES INTO THE GROUND

    I do not want my private data leeches and sold every day, I don’t even get paid for it

    • Batmorous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      That and fine them to oblivion. Piece their companies into parts. Make it all open source for the OS’es. Give ownership of companies to all the people. Etc. Lots and lots that can be done

    • jafra@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I almost came reading this rant. Thanks for bringing this so much more eloquently to the point.