transcript

Screenshot from Thomas Dietterich on X: “Attention @arxiv authors: Our Code of Conduct states that by signing your name as an author of a paper, each author takes full responsibility for all its contents, irrespective of how the contents were generated.”

With a reply from James Miller: “So this means you expect every author to check every citation and make sure that every citation is real and accurate? What if it’s beyond the ability of one of the authors to verify one of the citations because that citation is in a language he doesn’t know or concerns technical material he doesn’t understand but another author on the paper does?”

    • Corngood@lemmy.mlEnglish
      0·
      2 months ago

      We might never reach singularity. I think our universe is a simulation built to study how it happened in base reality - or what kinds of singularities aliens build. The event itself is probably too expensive to render. Our universe will cut to black.

      I feel a little bad dunking on a random guy, but this is very stupid

    • tomenzgg@midwest.socialEnglish
      0·
      2 months ago

      When someone proposes, implements or enforces a clearly sensible rule, and someone else brings weird corner case scenarios up, always ask yourself if there’s a conflict of interests.

      I can’t tell if I started doing this more as disinformation became more prevalent over the recent years or it’s something I’ve always done; I don’t know where I would’ve picked it up from.

      Nevertheless, you’re spot on; it’s an incredibly good rule-of-thumb.

      (I just realized it might’ve been funny if I’d responded to this with a weird, corner-case scenario, instead; but it’s late and I can’t think of a good one for it)