• Gonzako@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Feminism has disenfranchised me tbh. I am fine with their ideals and wishes but not with being called a predator.

          • Katana314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            As stupid as it was, he did kind of get you there.

            The world needs logic to at least discard bad-faith and emotionally-driven accusations. “Accused=Guilty” is fucking dumb.

            • lumpenproletariat@quokk.auOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              He didn’t really because I expected such a shitty response. It wasn’t legitimate, so I’m not putting any stock into it.

              No one has seriously called me a predator, and it’s telling if others are.

      • Gonzako@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’ve been in the trenches, I’ve made up my mind so far and I’ve gotten a few too many bad interactions with so called feminists. I’d actually be in the manosphere or a right wing grifter if I wasn’t actually given empathy by people like contra points in my growing years.

          • Gonzako@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Good ol out of context! I already had this talk so I’ll just skip the formalities. I AM Muslim and if switching one of my labels (man) to one of the others (Muslim) makes the content deletable the original comment should also be deletable.

            • Well you can’t just switch out labels like that, that is the whole point!

              a) critizing “all men” means critizing men as a class. The dominant class in relation to the oppressed class. They’re not talking about you the individual, they’re talking about the class of men.

              b) critizing “all muslims” is very much critizing every muslim as an individual. Muslims aren’t a societal class, but a huge group of people that have nothing in common other than them claiming to be part of the same religion.

              The difference is that a class is in relation to another class, you can’t have “men” without “women”. You can’t have “employers” without “employees”. You can’t have “slavers” without “slaves”. You can very much have “muslims” without “christians”. One is talking about societal structure and dynamics, the other about a trait shared by a group of people. One talks about societies perception of the individual (You’ll get treated like a man if people around you think you are one) the other about an individuals self-understanding (You’re a muslim if you say are one).

              That’s why one comment is fine and the other is very much deletable.