• Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The more recent report says corporate AI adoption has found several issues with AI, with human workers turning to automating dreary and mundane tasks they don’t like doing, rather than valuable or meaningful work.

    First of all, no shit. Second of all, wasn’t that the point?

    • Mikina@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      No no no, you don’t get it. You’re using it wrong, that’s why it’s so expensive. It’s the future, you have to adapt or get left behind.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      lol right, like that’s literally supposed to be the whole goal, but of course companies never wanted to make their workers lives better, they wanted to replace them wholesale

    • VeryVito@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      That’s literally its intended use case. It’s supposed to do the tedious grunt work so employees actually have time/inspiration to work on more innovate and important work.

      Did managers expect the meatware to stick to repetitive slog work while unsupervised robots, trained on Reddit and Pornhub comments, deliver them new products and profits from thin air?