• Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    Yes, it is an economic requirement. They can’t compete with beef cattle for meat production, keeping them alive just makes the milk more expensive than the farmer down the road who murders his calves can sell it for.

    • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      the vast majority of dairy calves are brought to full weight before slaughter, but slaughter still isn’t necessary.

      • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        How do you recoup the costs of raising a bull to full weight (which happens at a fraction of its natural lifespan) without slaughtering him? It’s like saying breathing isn’t necessary because you can just hold your breath.

              • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                26 days ago

                I’m not saying this to be insulting: that’s idiotic. You’re living in a fantasy world. Do you even understand why you are entertaining such ridiculous ideas? It’s because you don’t want to face the truth and acknowledge the consequences of your choices.

                But okay, let’s say a dairy could somehow operate without killing. They DON’T. You know for a fact that vulnerable individuals got murdered every time you buy dairy. So what the fuck?? What’s this fantasy of yours got to do with anything? It’s a distraction from your victims.