• gegil@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Graphene os is a good alternative to android. Its privacy and security focused, and also does not come with google serviced preinstalled. The only problem is that its only supported on google pixels, and porting it to other devices is impossible.

      • gegil@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Thats it, planned, and not yet released. But its good that at least in future there will be more options for a smartphone with foss operating system.

        Also, while in practice it would propably never happen, i hope that in the future, more smartphone makers will put alternative operating systems on their phones, or at least make it easier to install third party operating systems on their phones, like it is done on googles own pixels.

        • TheChargedCreeper864@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          I’m hoping for a MicroSD card slot. I’m on a Note 20 Ultra which I planned to run for far longer but it got the infamous “random green line out of nowhere” problem. I think Sony is the only one who still puts it in flagships

          • Addv4@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            Pretty much. On a Sony Xperia 1 V and it works great (best phone I’ve ever had). Downside is that the bootlocker for the US version is locked (AT&T thing) so I can’t just put lineageos on it or something, so I’ve been on the lookout for a replacement recently, and the pickings are pretty sparse.

            I’m probably gonna have to ride out the stupid Google bullshit for a few months until there is a decent alternative, as the graphene phone from Motorola probably won’t be released this year (and even then it probably won’t have a headphone jack and a micro SD card slot) and pretty much all of the Linux phones available now don’t really meet my needs (also no headphone jack on something like the jolla phone, which as someone used to Linux for years, I know Bluetooth headphones aren’t much of a solid option).

          • PrincessTardigrade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            Shoot I also recently got the freaking green line a few weeks ago. Yeah I also refuse to have a phone without a microsd option, why TF are they doing away with that?

  • einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    i have come to love just not owning a smartphone anymore.

    World is way more of an adventure when you out and about without internet connection on you.

    Wana know how to get somewhere? Find a map or ask someone.

    Pay something? There is cash for that.

    Wana take a picture? Just take a camera with you, because lets be real 99% of the pics in your smartphones camera roll wont get viewed ever again anyhow.

    Wana meet with other people? Well make out a time and spot before u leave the house…

    Wana be reachable to others while u out and about? Dont! Its a wonderfull feeling not to be.

    Wana pass some time while waiting for someone/something? Bring a book.

    Sure it may be inconvinient for others that you are not instantly reachable 24/7. But its a wonderfull feeling not to be. To comunicate on your own terms.

    • OhShitSon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Sounds wondeful, though it’s not possible in some parts of the world. Here in Sweden you need a phone to use a lot of services, and very few places still accept cash as payment.

      • toddestan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Luckily I’m still at the point where nothing I need to do absolutely requires a smartphone with either iOS or Google Android but it sure feels like that day is coming.

      • ugo@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        I did float to myself the idea of essentially stripping a phone bare of everything except necessary apps though, would get 80% of the way there

    • Xerxos@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      A lot of those things are possible, if a bit inconvenient. BUT I am old enough to have lived through the time before GPS and smartphones and navigating without it - especially in an unknown city - is simply terrible.

      If you have never experienced having to park your car and walk around, looking for a street name, just to find out where the hell you are… Count yourself lucky.

      Listen to an old timer: I never want to go back to that.

      Anyone who says otherwise simply doesn’t drive around a lot or only in well known areas.

    • Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      I’m sorry no one ever calls you or cares about you. It probably doesn’t have anything to do with you being an insufferable bloviator.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Damn, it must be nice not to have any responsibilities or people that count on you for things.

      • einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Incredible, huh, that nobody in the pre smartphone era had any responsibilities for the whole of human history…and now with em we all suddenly do.

        Its your choice to be reachable on your terms. Everything else is u caving in to peer pressure of a over communicative society.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          Oh my, I hadn’t accounted for the fact that things hadn’t changed at all in the past 40 years, you’re absolutely right. Nothing is different, no one has any needs or expectations outside of what happened back then.

          It’s your choice to live in the 80’s. don’t let anyone pressure you to become a useful part of society!

    • collectif_imaginaire@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      That’s life before 2000, or even up to 2005 or like. Was not bad, really. Internet was slow and stuck in computers, astalavista, radium, emule and burning dvds The evolution of cellphones into smartphones was somehow a bad move for humanity

    • Iteria@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Spoken like someone who isn’t responsible for others. My kid is ADHD and autistic. She’s high functioning, but that doesn’t mean I get to just be unreachable. I’m several people’s emergency contacts. I have to travel unknown places all the time and be there exactly to get the help my kid needs.

      I’m a single mother. I trade off whatever they are stealing from me for the ability to get cheaper versions of what my kid needs. My job is flexible, so it allows me to take my kid to what she needs with the understanding that I can answer questions when I’m away.

      Oh, I also have a deadly neurodegenerate disease that is only kept in check by this specific medication that I need to be places for a while to get. I like my phone reminding me to go get that and also being able to fill out the paperwork on my phone because of my shitty hands.

      A lot of people I see who are like, “Just live without a phone!” Are not the people who are actually responsible for people and/or things. I was like that when I was young, but then you know, I became a pillar of my family and friend network. People who are unreachable when needed are dropped from my network. I know several people who when I actually needed them and it was very dire, were unreachable. I left them messages and everything. Nope. Don’t think they ever knew the issue. Dropped. Sorry even in the 90s and 00s, you were expected to listen to your voice mails promptly. I shouldn’t have to mount a search party to find you, which is actually necessary for some people I know.

        • Iteria@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Tell me how many people rely on you? Because being unavailable for hours can actually be deadly to a child you are responsible for.

          I have 3 examples I have experienced, one with my own child where if I or the other person was just unavailable while they were outside of the house, irreparable damage would have happened to the child. Or in my in kid’s case, she would have just died.

  • JojoWakaki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Ok this sucks, but there is something that seems to be not implied. Wait one day, then confirm with biometrics, then decide if you want this only this time, or 1 week, or forever. You have to only deal with this one time if you choose forever (as long as you don’t reinstall, I assume).

    This is by no means ideal, but I think I’m ok with this. In a way I believe the rhetoric they are framing, to protect the vulnerable populace (e.g. the elderly) from frauds. For your phone, you can get the hurdle over one time, if you are installing for your parent you can do “don’t ask me for a week, or ask me again everytime”, so they don’t install something malicious as part of a guided “tech support”. Not saying that will prevent all and any spams but it will add some barrier. Just my opinion though, I could be off base with this.

    I do wish that 1 day waiting was a bit shorter.

    • orioler25@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      You’re off base with this. Almost unbelievably so.

      They know they aren’t concerned with scams, why are you pretending? The move is to restrict competition and improve surveillance capacity as much as possible with as much legal protection as possible for Google. “Vulnerable people” don’t typically know how to use F-Droid, and scammers would take a week to find out am effective alternative even if this was somehow their main tactic; which it is not and they did fine before it was an option.

      I own my phone. I get to pick what is installed on it. The fucking mandatory Google apps were already too far, this is straight up telegraphing intent to commodify as much of my life as they can get access to. Even beyond how fucking bad this is for the overall health of tech development and sovereignty, I dont want a company that is complicit with a fascist state to force me or anyone else who would challenge that state to register our fucking identities with them. For all I fucking know, they’d get me thrown into a camp as readily as they’d cut off my access to pirated media. You think it’s a coincidence they’re doing this shit at the same time liberals and fascists are desperately trying to seize some kind of control over the internet? It’s for grandma’s safety? The fuck it is.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        I dont want a company that is complicit with a fascist state to force me or anyone else who would challenge that state to register our fucking identities with them.

        Now in fairness to google, they’re complicit with multiple fascist states.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      This would mean something if the old people google is pretending to give a shit about couldn’t already download all sorts of scammy shit from google’s official store.

      • JojoWakaki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        Yes exactly.

        The same with “oh we need the app creator/publisher to register so people don’t submit random shitty apps”. <looks at google’s play store populated with bunch of random shitty, scammy apps>

  • python@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    I mean, getting verified as a developer is a similar pain in the ass in other ecosystems. I recently got an LG smart TV and the developer mode there automatically runs out and deletes all unofficial apps after 9999h if you don’t manually go into the developer app and extend the time.

    My hot take is that you shouldn’t have to claim that you’re a developer to sideload content. It should be allowed for normal users 🤷

  • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Is this actually 100% true?

    I know Google/Android/Alphabet sucks but this seems over the top even for them.

      • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Thanks. The xheet and this article are almost identical.

        protective waiting period

        triggers me. It only protects their business interests, because that’s the biggest of the multiple hurdles that are all designed to disincentivize people from doing that.

        Also read: security theater

        • GaumBeist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          I wouldn’t go quite that far. It doesn’t only protect their business interest; it definitely does achieve the goals they claim—like helping non-tech-literate users to avoid getting scammed with malware—it’s just they’re only doing it this way because it also aligns with their business interest.

          To that end I’d contest the “Security Theater” label. All security measures are ultimately implemented in a way that defends the interests of the owners. It’s just that people have forgotten or aren’t aware that Proprietary Software means they’re not the owners.

          Of course if it was just about users’ safety, the most effective way to help people avoid getting scammed is to educate them, but that would make people less dependent on Google and less susceptible to vendor lock-in, and people may even start having dangerous thoughts like “it sure is weird how many identifying traits of a scam are also just standard business practices for large corporations like Google.”

  • Tja@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    I know I’m in the minority, but I find acceptable. I haven’t sideloaded anything in a while, but this just means waiting a week when I get a new phone. Usually it takes me longer than that to fully migrate, so it’s like a non issue.

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Nah fuck that, I’d like to install the apps I use on day one not wait a week, most things I use come from F-Droid.

      A non issue for you, but extremely annoying and privacy invasive nonetheless, you’re just fine with annoying privacy violations.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        It’s not an issue for me and for 99.998% of users out there. I know it’s hard to believe on lemmy, but the average user doesn’t even know what sideloading is, let alone needing it.

          • Tja@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            To avoid scams and security problems, pr disasters if it happens, revenue loss… Same reason iOS doesn’t allow it.

            Whether I work for Google or not shouldn’t matter, but glad you think that, I’ll take it as a compliment.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        It’s google’s platform, there’s nothing to give them. They have shown for the last 2 decades they take decisions based on money and whiny powerusers and tech reviewers are not their main concern. Downvote all you want, obviously it’s not what people want to hear, but it’s the reality.

        • paul@lemmy.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Yeah the only thing we can do in this relationship is NOT give them our business. Which I, ironically, say as a Google pixel owner.

          It’s their restaurant they get to make their food however they want and if we don’t like it we just don’t eat there.

          Personally I’m looking to change os but when it comes time to replace my phone I’ll be buying European or Asian. If I can rid myself of American businesses in my life, I’ll feel much better.

          • Tja@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            Yep, I agree. However, the only other viable option is even worse. When I was younger I had time to play with Linux phones, I even dailyed two of them for over a year each. Nowadays I just don’t care that much.

  • GaumBeist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    De-googled Android ROMs:

    • GrapheneOS
    • LineageOS
    • /e/ OS
    • Volla OS

    Non-android, non-apple smartphones:

    • Pinephone
    • Pinephone pro
    • Librem 5
    • Volla Phone 22
    • Jolla Phone
    • FuriPhone FLX1s

    And pretty much every feature phone out there (way too many to list)

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      De-googled Android ROMs:

      Aren’t most of them de-googled? Usually you install gApps separately, unless that’s changed

      Non-android, non-apple smartphones:

      Not non-android out of the box, but just to add to your list: Ubuntu reports that nearly everything except VoLTE works on the Fairphone 4 and 5, but sadly they don’t support the 6 yet. PostMarketOS shows more issues

      • GaumBeist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        I would guess that most Android ROMs are OEM ones that are not degoogled (and have the added spyware of Cellular Service Providers or phone brands), I’m not familiar enough with AOSP Stock Images to make a judgment on those, and the rest that I know of—which are actively maintained and have been around long enough brand-recognition that I trust them to be non-glitchy and spyware free—comprise the above list.

        If you got more suggestions, I will gladly add them to the list though.

        Ubuntu reports that nearly everything except VoLTE works on the Fairphone 4 and 5

        Oh snap, so is that UBPorts? I’m not sure how to classify that tbh, I might need a 3rd category that’s Linux Phone OSes that work on Android-focused phones. Actually, just looking at it rn and it looks like PostMarket claims to support over 700 devices…

      • GaumBeist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        I don’t have them, they just come up in a search for “Linux-based Phone.” Please share your experience if you have the time! People need to know what they’re getting into!

  • Fair Fairy@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Openness was the primary reason I always stuck with android. Without that, fuck them. If I have no options I’m just gonna use Huawei.