The duck probably:
D-D-Danger lurks behind you!
Youve got to grab on to some…duck cocks?
A-Wooooo!
It amuses me that the joke wouldn’t have really worked without that rather pronounced depiction of an ass.
Did any of y’all watch Scientifically Accurate Ducktales?
Umm… no?
…
Ok, now i have. Wow. I knew all that to begin with, but hearing it in the theme song of duck tails really paints the picture. LOL
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x3azdi0
Holy shit a dailymotion link.
I knew it! That’s why autocorrect constantly switches important word(s) to “duck”!
A duck walked up to the lemon cake stand. And he said to the man, running the stand…
Hey! (Bum bum bum), got any rape?
Nature’s wine bottle openers
Literally cockscrews 😩😭
I don’t get it
he’s going to get raped by a duck. that’s the joke.
rape is funny, right? The Boys said it was. “retarded” is back, rape jokes are back, who said time is linear?
Idk i generally agree but the joke here isn’t really rape but more the subversion of expectations, the joke couldve easily been ‘yeah i learned last week the magpie steals shit’ cut to panel of their keys getting stolen, instead of them learning it through a book. The rape part is of course to heighten the shock value, and is this more of a prop than the actual joke. So it’s not like the underlying message is ‘rape is funny right guys?’, but i definitely also see the objectionable part of using such serious topics like rape as comedic props
Also sidenote, this is cyanide and happiness, that’s kinda their whole thing
I mean switch the character to a woman and ask yourself if rape is taking a backseat to the subversion.
not my kinda humor and I get I’m the buzzkill here but uhhh, just wanted to state my feelings on the matter to maybe help some other like-minded person feel heard.
C&H characters are genderless unless specified. they’re practically stick figures dude
Nah they put boobs on ‘em if they’re women; otherwise the default’s a man.
Again I’ve moved on as OP implored me to do in their deleted comment, but uhhh, whatever drives engagement I suppose. 🤙
that’s your interpretation of stick figures but okay. they put boobs on them when it’s important that they’re female. they put a dick on when it’s important it’s male. that’s how stick figures work. otherwise they’re genderless.
I think its the writers’ interpretations too. They really only put dicks on them when the joke is specifically about the dick. There are plenty of times when the character is the normal stick figure with no dick, but explicitly gendered male. But when the character is explicitly gendered female, they always have boobs or a feminine haircut. Also in the animations the standard stick figures are always given masculine voices.
Ok, if that’s what you think is happening. 🤙 agree to disagree. have a great day bud.
Changing genders does nothing to this comic.
Despite the word being used, it’s not actually a joke about rape. This is a joke on the same level as a weiner dog humping someone’s leg. The perspective of an overly amorous duck with the main characters butt in frame add to the humor of it, but it’s still only a crappy joke about an animal trying to get it on with a person.
‘Overly amorous’ is not a way to describe rapists.
Yes, that’s why I used it to describe a duck instead.
No no i getcha, should’ve maybe stressed the ‘its still objectionable’ part a bit more. All respect for being a buzzkill btw, that shit is often needed.
Duck Duck No
What are you doing back there step-duck?
Goose-step-ping-duck?
