Oh, I think he’ll like this inevitable outcome then.

One day the masses will take everything from Steve Roth or his heirs. That is a fact of life and nothing can stop it. You can be sure that it doesn’t stop at a little wealth tax.

deleted by creator

To quote Tony Soprano: OH, POOR YOU!

sure fine whatever

here’s another

kill em all

Well,

He’s a cunt then

How about “eat the rich” then, motherfucker? With BBQ sauce.

Is “guillotine” a softer word? We could and should just use that instead. I’m all about catering to the elites’ baby soft thin skin.

I dont think it is a slur. To be rich is even to this day associated with good qualities.

in other words, the word rich doesnt reflect reality and we have to weed it out

I think grabber is more suitable, because they grab property away from the commons.

Release the grip!

And much like racists using racial slurs to express how much they hate, we use “tax the rich” while hating you

Source: https://www.moralambition.org/stories/tax-fairness-explainer

Also, the above graph compares averages vs averages. The average of the top bracket is made up of some very rich people who accept that paying taxes is a fair thing to do, and some who try to contribute as little as possible by evading as much as possible. Because he’d prefer us to not talk about this, I have the suspicion that Mr Steve Roth falls into the 2nd category.

“Tax the rich” is putting it very nicely.

They’ve dehumanized themselves with their monstrous exploitation.

If that’s true, then we are using it right. I’d only use a slur on beings that are less than human and ultra rich fit that pereftly. And as well read as the rich are, they know what happens when a being is considered less than human. >:D

It he prefers “eat the rich”, I won’t object.

“TAX” is going to be the softest, most palateable verb that will be done to them, the alternatives are a little less polite.