bleh.au
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to Privacy@lemmy.ml ·
edit-2
2 months ago

Just got this popup whilst trying to open a website using archive.is

lemmy.ml

message-square
115
link
fedilink
1

Just got this popup whilst trying to open a website using archive.is

lemmy.ml

IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to Privacy@lemmy.ml ·
edit-2
2 months ago
message-square
115
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • CosmicTurtle0 [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    For those curious:

    • QR code: https://recaptcha.net/qr/mMs9S9g8
    • which resolves to: https://support.google.com/recaptcha/answer/16609652
    • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      TL;DR:

      Supported Environments for reCAPTCHA Mobile Verification:

      • Android Devices:
        • Google Play Services version 25.41.30 or greater.
        • To verify Google Play Services version on an Android device, open Settings > Apps > All Apps > Google Play Services
      • iOS/iPadOS devices for QR Code Scan:
        • Version 15.0 or greater.
      • iOS/iPadOS devices for “Click to Verify” Button:
        • Version 16.4 or greater.
        • Version 15.0-16.4 with the reCAPTCHA app installed.

      Fuck Google

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah I’m not picking up my phone to use your website. Bye.

  • monovergent@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    That really stinks. Does the audio version do anything different?

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I did not try it and have closed the window after the popup because it was too ridiculous. I was able to find an article about this, looks like the rollout started a week ago https://cybernews.com/privacy/google-qr-code-recaptcha-requires-approved-phone/

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is beyond insane. ‘An approved device’. So, my device has to be approved by a fucking company. This is where all this bullshit has led. Companies now get to dictate the life of every person in the world. I’m going to be spending a lot of time away from the internet moving forward. Thank God we have Lemmy.

  • Voxel@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The following for furthur info: https://thebrainbin.org/m/degoogle@lemmy.ml/p/678383

    • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Is it legit that Anubis needs cookies?

  • Godort@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I would assume this was trying to deliver malware if I ever saw it

    • sic_semper_tyrannis@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’ll certainly cause more people to get malware by normalizing people to scan QR codes on a whim without thinking

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It arguably is malware.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Probably still is. Scan it and let us know if you get malware.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s goes to recapt cha.net/qr/mMs9S9g8

        (Space addes to break the link.)

  • GreenCrunch@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    this must be a rickroll, right?

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      tbh I’d rather have a 5% chance of being rickrolled for each link I click for the rest of my life than having this stupid invasive captcha everywhere

    • warmaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Scan this QR code with your moble device to verify if you have been rickrolled. reCAPTCHA protects you from rickrolling and will not give you up and share your details with rickrollers nor it will let you down and desert you.

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      In hindsight I should have edited the QR code to redirect to that.

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      How are people surprised by this??? This change has been constantly in the news for weeks now. How are people missing this? Its basically googles way to bypass all the backlash to age verification, because most phones are linked to peoples identity, phone number, etc.

      https://cybernews.com/privacy/google-qr-code-recaptcha-requires-approved-phone/

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Yes, I “like” the surprises scanning a unknown QR code. I hate this crap, same as this short URLs, it’s not different from clicking on shady ad banners. A trustworth website don’t need this shit, hiding its domain.

    https://www.expandurl.net/

    The QR code point to https://recaptcha.net/qr/mMs9S9g8

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Your QR code scanner showns you the URL before you choose to open it, right? So I don’t really get the comparison to short URLs. As with any normal link, you get to see the link before you choose to “click” the QR code after you scan it.

      • NannerBanner@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ah, yes, dark patterns are okay because they can be worked around. Got it.

        • dev_null@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t understand, why is a QR code a dark pattern?

          Edit: I have now read the entire Wikipedia page on dark patterns, I didn’t find one that would match.

          • NannerBanner@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Because a qr code is not a url. You might get one flashed, but it’s just like a 40 page eula: the amount of people who are going to pay attention is an order of several magnitudes smaller.

  • Mike@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    So it begins.

  • Bronstein_Tardigrade@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I won’t click on those Captcha pictures, so I’m sure as hell not scanning a QR code.

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s what google’s been using to lockout non official Android forks like GrapheneOS. You can click on the eye icon at the bottom to get the regular captcha though… for now.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      How does it stop those from scanning it?

      • LostCarcosan@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Requires Google Play Services, from what I’ve heard, meaning it will only allow people who have phones pre approved by Google. I assume they also made some Apple service also acceptable. Can’t cut out their friends

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh you can scan it, but as I recall they then force you to put your phone number in to finish the process.

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Ffs

  • Solumbran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Good thing that everyone has a smartphone as a secondary device. God forbid you would not be able to scan a QR code, what are we, the middle ages?!?! (and I’m not even starting on the absurdity of why you would want to do it, that’s another point)

  • JohnDarlen@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Any service implementing this shit will be on my list of never using it again. Even if my bank do such shit I’ll be moving to another one. Zero tolerancy. This is beyond the limits.

    • freijon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s easy to say this now. But what if, in a few years, 90% of websites and service providers use this?

      • Ænima@lemmy.zip
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ll be done using the internet!

    • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I agree, and this is strictly because Google wants to kill forks like Graphene OS. Anybody who implements this is going to get their tab immediately closed on my browser and I’m never going back. I will have zero tolerance for this.

      • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        And also their domain will be in my deny filters. Fuck this.

  • overcast@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    oh no, it’s already happening… I must be ready

  • Abyssian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think I read on a lemmy post the other day that archive.is… kills babies? I don’t remember what it was, but that they’re bad and shouldn’t be used because of the badness.

    • CAVOK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Apparenly DDOSing a blog iirc. You’re not allowed to use it over at the Europe community because of it.

      • triplenadir@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        DDOSing a blog that was doing free work for Big Copyright and Big Paywall by trying to doxx the archive.is operator.

    • Mark with a Z@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They use your pc for a ddos attack every time you visit. Actual malware.

  • Damage@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Btw I suggest URLCheck on F-Droid, it registers as a browser and allows you to check, clean, un-shorten links and so on before opening them

    • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Does it actually correct the links for you? Like use invideous rather than YouTube or correct the useless parameters automatically?

Privacy@lemmy.ml

privacy@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !privacy@lemmy.ml

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don’t promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

  • Lemmy.ml libre_culture
  • Lemmy.ml privatelife
  • Lemmy.ml DeGoogle
  • Lemmy.ca privacy

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 70 users / day
  • 363 users / week
  • 1.21K users / month
  • 4.26K users / 6 months
  • 0 local subscribers
  • 50K subscribers
  • 1.01K Posts
  • 17.3K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • k_o_t@lemmy.ml
  • tmpod@lemmy.pt
  • Yayannick@lemmy.ml
  • ranok@sopuli.xyz
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org