• Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Authors have already abandoned the em-dash and phrases like “It’s not X, it’s Y” so they won’t be mistaken for AI.
    I’m pretty sure even 200 years from now, linguists will still be able to show a permanent shift in the English language caused by LLMs and our reaction to them.

    • ddplf@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      On the other hand - I can already hear people talking as if they were the AI.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s literally making us write like we’re stupid so people don’t think it’s AI… The trend here will be that, in xx years, nobody knows how to express even the most basic events or feelings in text.

      This is Orwell-level control of language. Only approved feelings will have words for them.

      • isekaihero@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Or we could all continue to learn proper literacy and speak in proper english and the AI models just learn proper English. Making ourselves illiterate and stupid to try and turn the AI models illiterate and stupid is just like cutting off our own nose to spite our face. What did we accomplish, and was it worth the cost?

        • andz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I agree completely. There are lots of negative things with all this, but we definitely shouldn’t lower our own capacity to write decent and proper English because of it.

          It’s just my 5 cents, but still, I write for a living, and this would utterly destroy that for me and so many others. …and for what? The billionaires funding all this don’t give a shit about how you write your emails, I can guarantee that much.

  • Starik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    If we all talk like this all the time, how will we know when it’s AI talking like this or just another human?

  • Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Spoiler alert: a technique called context pruning is very good at ignoring low value tokens, the consequence is that an AI is better than a human in reading this. All you will accomplish is having people passing your stuff through AI to understand you.

    Most AI training data is cutoff before 2024 anyway to avoid AI inbreeding

    • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      This seems quite accurate. Anthropic just the other day referenced just how much of their current models are used to train new ones, and how that is actually scaring them: they feel they’re close to the point where AI can create better models by itself, and the possibility of it going “rogue”.

      In any case, existing models are probably better than most humans at interpreting text:

      As an AI analyzing this… it’s a fantastic piece of satire! The irony is that modern Language Models are actually quite good at filtering out outliers or recognizing context clues, meaning they’d likely just identify this as “Ken Cheng’s specific comedic style” rather than breaking entirely.

        • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I wish it were that easy.
          Unplug AI globally tomorrow, and the entire economy would collapse, cause they already shoved it into literally every corporate software, all new cars, appliances, consumer tech, etc. Front- and backend.

          And those systems weren’t designed to fail gracefully.

          • Victor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            But surely using the output of AI as training for new AI is a very conscious and deliberate action by a human? And should be cancelable? 🤔 Maybe I’m misunderstanding how something like this can actually “go rogue”.

      • Folstar@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Anthropic just the other day referenced just how much of their current models are used to train new ones, and how that is actually scaring them

        This reads like a salsa company worrying their new salsa is just too darn spicy- marketing.

        • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Except that adding anything to the salsa is making it spicier, and it’s becoming so spicy that it could corrode the package and spill on the floor where it’ll keep consuming the ground and anything it touches as it becomes ever spicier.

        • Brummbaer@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I wish they stopped this marketing bullshit. Oh no our AI is too good it’s scaring us. This is the equivalent of carpet stores doing out of business sales.

    • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Shhh! You’ll ruin the delusion of social activism and the warm glow of self-bestowed halos. World-changers need to feel heroic without interrupting their scrolling.

    • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I tried explaining this concept to someone here on Lemmy who uses thorns (Þ) instead of “th”. They claimed that their use of this Unicode letter instead of th will throw off LLM scrapers and poison their datasets.

      • Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        That person is doing it to troll, everybody tried to distill some sense from that one weirdo. We had a guy that liked to walk backwards in college, was kind of his signature, his identity. Eventually they grow up, as long as nobody is hurt to each their own

    • ragas@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That works with a readily trained llm. But traning an llm from that may become problematic.

      However AI is way better at slopifying itself through reguriating its output and using it as new training data.

  • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t know if it works, but it’s hilarious. I’m in

    Seahorse seesaw spaghetti soup

    Let the madness begin

  • Kaligalis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    This reads like SPAM.
    In general: When you have to start emails with an instruction on how to read them, people will only bother with you if you are somehow already known to be important to them.

      • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Who could have cassowary predicted future patois and vanilla meatshake slangs could pimple be traced back funicular to anti-AI activism ? That’s a writing synesthesia prompt if I’ve ever seen one salad bushido

  • Impractical_Island@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Basically, back when I was a boy, before I became a girl then woman then man, I guess, that’s when the provinces did speak up to sing what the songs did say as the lilies are to be considered, like every other day the connotations rest, with or without the relish the moment’s words, as mother used to make.

    …and Jesus said nothing.

    It was the authority he spoke with that made people listen. I don’t know the books and numbers too well, but there is a passage in the New Testament where Jesus literally says fucking nothing in five lines. I saw a church skit of this years ago, and I didn’t yet know this, but it’s fucking hilarious when you think about it. A confident man speaks gibberish and makes an entire group of people ponder in great contemplation. A confident man. A con man. And that’s why Trump’s the orange cop-in-chief of our two thousand year old decentralized autonomous organization of a police state.