Warm take: Any video essay longer than 2 hours needs to learn to get to the fucking point
Some topics do genuinely require more time though. But those can and should be split into well-defined chapters.
Yup. The ones that are just a blow by blow recap are not really offering anything valuable. If there are specific chapters with points to make then longer videos can be done but generally I find even then it could benefit from knowing when to cut content.
I find most are just 2 hours of takes wrapped around 30 minutes of content.
I feel like the second video could likely have been condensed a bit
Behind the Bastards did a 6 part (~6 hr) block on Kissinger that I appreciated
Dan Olson: hold my beer.
I dare you to shorten this, never playd the game, never want to, but dam that was a good story
I knew what it was going to be before I clicked it. I’m glad I wasn’t disappointed
Reminds me of that one hate-review of the captain marvel movie that was longer than the movie itself (and more entertaining…)
Classic Gbay99.
Posts like this are dumb. The USA or Canada has how much more history than Israel? The problem is not that a state is modern, the problem is when it is an apartheid state. But one does not need to invent dumbfuck shit then to use against an apartheid state. Also just goes and shows what people are willing to spend 4 hours on listening to, nothing else.
Yes that’s the joke
But one does not need to invent dumbfuck shit then to use against an apartheid state.
Then why did you type that out?
Ignore the genocides and crimes and It will be wrapped up in about 12min
But then you get just:
“In the 19th century, there were angry people which lead to suddenly Israel and that made people also angry.”
Considering its one of the oldest civilizations still around today, no it wouldn’t be
Palestine is a more rightful continuation of that than Israel, ngl.
Wow, I didn’t know Faker committed genocide. That is crazy!






