• Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Capitalism doesn’t breed enough innovation for new reasons. That’s why they need AI, to come up with new bullshit.

      • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Sort of, except this time instead of it being millions of homes about to be foreclosed on its like 10 multibillion dollar companies, so the real problem is who is positioned to buy those companies when their share price crashes and they need to be sold for peanu… fuck it’s Trump isn’t it? In 2 months we’ll be using MicroTrump Werd to write reports and Tesla Xsell to build spreadsheets, but only when we can navigate our way through a minefield of vibecoded slop and ads for ICE.

        • alk@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          Damn if only there were some sort of alternative not owned by anyone and built by the community. If I’m making impossible wishes I’d also want it to be free to use. Maybe even open source.

          Nah that would never work. Who would put in that kind of effort for free? Silly idea.

          • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            Sadly my company has complete say over the platforms I use when at work. Given their scramble to adopt copilot with little or no obvious benefits and unknown depth of security flaws, I don’t hold much hope that they will pivot to an entire new platform suite on Microsoft’s collapse …

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          Well everyone’s index-based investments will also take a nose dive to be fair. So that’s going to be a lot of people’s retirement funds set back by several years, maybe a decade.

        • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          You jest but USGov already owns 10% of Intel, the seal’s been cracked, and it’d be a suitably fascist move.

          • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            Considering that both Intel and AMD originally grew up on government contracts, It’s a wonder that the government doesn’t own 49% of each.

    • veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      OpenAI is small fry compared to the other AI players. They are the least likely to get a bailout.

      This is actually a moment where “Thanks Obama” applies, what a precedence to set… Should have given the relief on the demand-side, not the fucking banks.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      I have a take on that. I’m going with hank green on this one. https://youtu.be/jOR4wuiPeEQ

      The entire US economy is being held up by the ultra-wealthy right now. We should be in a recession, but they’re pushing all the right buttons in all the right places to keep stocks where they need to be to keep running.

      The AI bubble isn’t blindly bobbing around on the top waiting to pop, it’s orchestrated. Yes, it’s a bubble. Yes the stated value there isn’t anywhere near real. But it’s not going to pop until they let it. Investors are going to stay with it as long as they’re not scared of it going away and the ultra rich are using it as a vehicle to maintain wealth and unless they somehow screw up, it’s not going anywhere until they decide to do something different.

      OpenAI isn’t too big to fail, but the Industry as a whole is too well-funded and tightly controlled to let it fail, for now.

      • Nangijala@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Stupid question, but since the world is currently falling over itself to make new business connections/alliances and is moving away from investing in the US economy because the clown president likes to threaten his allies, how long will the US economy last as the world slowly abandons America? Because while the movement may appear slow right now, I am actually experiencing this extreme change in the world order to be happening super fast. The effects may not be felt over night and maybe not even in ten years, but what trump has accomplished in one year, will most likely have a very negative impact on the US economy for decades and decades to come. Because we ain’t fucking coming back. That’s for sure.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          Not a stupid question at all, but so far in the weeds of speculation that we couldn’t get a straight answer out of it with a 24 pack of beer, a d100, and a really good DM. But let’s ponder.

          The nature of international trade and finance is screwy AF. It’s like finance for the rich, where the only money that exists is what people owe to you and what you owe to people. Noting ever changes hands, not to say that it would soften the blows but it does make the effects move more slowly than one might want.

          If it were just the international fall of Apple, Microsoft, and Google, along with the standard bits and bobbles of alcohol, and whatever 100 other odd consumer products we actually still manage to produce in the states, I don’t think that’ll hurt us as much as whatever eventually happens to with AI. A single day of military production probably outstrips most of that. While it’s possible that other warmachines can ramp up to quell the hunger of everyone for world destruction and weapons for self-preservation, I suspect once the current series of aggressions, fiasco,s and administration disappear, the US war machine will still find plenty of buyers, though the menu will likely change as we’ll no longer seen as a reliable ally. Food and Oil/industrial exports will likely fluctuate, at most. I suspect they’ll be forced to sell at a discount. If tourism doesn’t recover, that’ll beat the F out of a lot of places. We might see Vegas go fallout style.

          I’d love to see European alternatives for Apple, Microsoft, and Google. I’d import that in a hot second.

          Honestly, If the world really wanted to see the US burn, they could just stop trade altogether. The time to restructure food, coal and oil would be enough to starve out a lot of the population, even if we’re relatively close to self sustaining, none of those channels are setup.

          Imaine the calls for blood when you can’t get produce out of season and avocados become $15 each.

          • Phunter@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 days ago

            Not that I don’t wanna teach USA a lesson, but I feel like stopping all trade would be like shooting yourself and a bipolar bear each in the foot in an attempt to see who bleeds out first. Answer: nobody bleeds out and everybody is pissed, especially the bear.

            Also, I think USA gets a lot of avocados from California farms and Mexico so those might stay cheap regardless.

            Definitely displace/replace the tech giants though. Monopolies suuuuuck.

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    The tech bros have been disastrously wrong about the future of technology twice since Moore’s Law broke and the endless treadmill of computer upgrades stopped: about crypto and about the metaverse. They’re desperate to not be wrong again, and they think that by spending enough money they can generate a reality distortion field that actually makes overhyped AI financially feasible. So they’re going to keep pumping the money in as long as they’ve got it. But even their wallets are finite.

    • RamenJunkie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      As someone who has regularly used virtual worlds for 20 years, the whole Metaverse thing was so hilarious.

      Like, Facebook did not invent 3D online worlds, there are 3D online worlds older than Facebook.

      “But wait, metaverse is not just 3D Virtual Worlds.”

      Which inecitably leads to "ok, so its just “The Internet”.

      As for the “Constantly being wrong.” At somepoint, these people forgot that “having an idea” does not mean “Having a useful idea.” You hear arguments about all these flash in the pan bull shit concepts like “People said the same thing about the internet or the iPhone.” Yeah, and they said the same thing about a dozen other new idea that time forgot for every Internet or every iPhone idea that took off. Not every idea is “the next big thing”. Statisrically, most ideas are “Not ever a thing.”

  • itkovian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    AI has the momentum only from investors and banks. But unfortunately, the paying customers are few and far between. Also, don’t forget that these companies are losing money even on the paying customers. There doesn’t seem to be any path to profitability for these companies. So, no wonder everyone is saying it’s a bubble.

    • Azrael@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      I’m no scientist, but i’m pretty sure there’s a giant fusion reactor in the sky. I think it’s called The Sun or something like that.

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      “We are 20 years away from Fusion if we get X amount of money”
      – Scientists right before recieving less than 1% of X amount of money.

      • zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        There is no incentive to invest into Fusion technology, as it would make crude oil, coal, rare earths, other rate metals and minerals lose a lot of value. The graph you show is still very interesting and I never saw that before, so thank you for sharing.

  • scytale@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    More like, the AGI that those CEOs are saying will solve all the world’s problems as long as we keep giving them billions of dollars and more data centers.

    • Feyd@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Right? How can everyone not see it? Didn’t they hear Dario say everyone will be replaced in 6 months for the 20th time since 2022?

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    The sad thing is that when it bursts it won’t do it in a hilarious “billionaires all get shafted” way like it didn’t any of the previous times. It’s far more likely to take the form of the most powerful AIs suddenly only being accessible to the wealthy.

    • drsilverworm@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      It will burst because billionaires decided to get out. They will know just before it happens and time their exit perfectly. Everyone else will suffer and then they will buy right back at a massive discount. They have all the information, the fastest movement, and control of the levers. I refuse to play this unwinnable game.