We’re taught both metric and US customary units in school. I prefer metric for most things, to the point I have a metric-only tape measure among other things.

However, I’ll die on the hill that Fahrenheit is superior for ambient air temperature. 0 degrees to 100 degrees neatly encompasses the range of average surface temperatures seen throughout the year in the contiguous US.

  • smeg@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I always preferred metric and Celsius. When I lived in South Korea, I was able to adapt immediately. Now I live in Europe and it makes all of the conversions easier.

    Americans resistant to metric, in my opinion, are not very smart.

    • sorghum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Murican’ here. The only place I prefer Fahrenheit is in weather mainly for how ironically base 10 it scales for human related comfortability for outdoor activity.

      100°+ dangerous heat

      90s very hot, drink lots of water

      80s shorts weather

      70s comfortable

      60s long sleeves

      50s jacket weather

      40s bring a coat

      30s coat and hat (water freezing is here at 32°)

      20s layers

      10s insulated layers

      0s very cold, protect exposed skin

      -0s dangerous cold

      Everywhere else I’m fine for C°

          • schnapsman@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Base 10 is nice for crossing regimes of scales, orders of magnitude. But we don’t really engage with temperature that way. The problem I have with F-heit on its own, is that it’s much too precise. The difference of a degree is meaningless, especially when considering weather. Fahrenheit weather maps are cluttered, dials and buttons on thermostats and in cars are slow, thermometer readings change too frequently, etc. USian shoe sizes have the opposite problem. If you need to use half sizes all the time then FFS just multiply the scale by 2.

          • Orygin@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            That’s incidental:

            he adjusted the scale so that the melting point of ice would be 32 degrees, and body temperature 96 degrees, so that 64 intervals would separate the two, allowing him to mark degree lines on his instruments by simply bisecting the interval 6 times (since 64 = 2⁶).

  • Iced Raktajino@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Metric for most measurements except temperature (Fahrenheit - same reason you gave) and colloquial distances/velocities (e.g miles to the store, miles per hour).

  • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    the range of average surface temperatures seen throughout the year in the contiguous US.

    So give it a few more years of global warming and you won’t want to use that anymore either.

  • Mister Neon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Metric in logic, but standard measurements are ingrained into my brain so it’s more practical. I think that sucks.

    • Heydo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Agreed. If I am making it building something then I prefer metric. If I am thinking about how tall something is or how long it is I think in standard. I just feel that one foot is a good size to measure something rather than meters or centimeters. It’s much easier for me to imagine a 6 foot tall object than a 1.83 meters or 183 centimeters. It’s just easier to break something up into 6 parts than it is to break something into 1.83 parts or 183 parts.

      I know you could use a unit that equals 25 centimeters and that would be similar to a foot, but no one uses that for some reason.

  • Devadander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Fahrenheit for temperature until the day I die. The rest I don’t really care, the mental conversions are easy to get close enough. But F for temp as a human being is vastly superior

    • Quilotoa@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      How is it vastly superior? 0 is freezing. 100 is boiling. 25 is comfortable human temperature.

      • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.worldBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Thermostats and other temperature displays with three digits for Celsius are a tacit admission that Fahrenheit is more useful.

        • Quilotoa@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          They are an admission that the U.S. market is large. 99 % of the world’s countries using Celcius is a blatant admission that celcius is more useful.

        • warm@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Don’t be scared of decimals. But it’s whatever you are used to for measurement units. If you grow up with one, the other won’t make any sense.

          Celsius is just preferable because it has an easy to understand scale, 0 being freezing and 100 being boiling. Farenheit is just whatever the fuck.

          Same with the rest of the metric system, it’s all divisible nicely. The USA is just stubborn to change, but are slowly converting, they will probably end up like the UK, using both.

          • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.worldBanned
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            The fact that Celsius needs three digits to express what Fahrenheit can do with two shows that Celsius degrees are too close together. Plus, you need a sign since Celsius is often negative.

            Fahrenheit just covers the human-felt temperature range better. 0°F is very cold, 99°F is very hot.

            And the zero-and 100-points of both scales are equally arbitrary. Kelvin at least has a zero point based on an intrinsic property of temperature. And “double” or “half” mean something in kelvin.

            • warm@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              It doesn’t? Nobody needs the accuracy of 3 digits to tell the temperature, a 1°C change is just about perceivable to us. So having more of a scale is irrelevant (and if you do want more, then having 3 digits is literally a non-issue). You also use a sign for negatives in Farenheit when it gets that cold and you use 3 numbers when it gets that hot. This is the first time I’ve ever heard this argument for Farenheit ahaha.

              Basing Celsius around water, something we all come into contact to, which we freeze and boil all the time. Is not really an “arbitrary” scale. Farenheit was based on a solution of brine and then a rough estimate of human body temperature, two things not even related.

              You wouldn’t like Kelvin, that uses 3 numbers.

              • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.worldBanned
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                I never seen a sign or a third digit on a Fahrenheit thermostat. Every time I set my car to metric it adds a tenths digit because Celsius degrees are too coarse.

                • cepelinas@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  What car is that, I am european and I haven’t seen even a single time a car show anything in tenths of a degree and besides how the fuck is a thermostat going to get that precise without being a lab one or for a small space.

  • gigastasio@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    My perspective is probably unique but…

    I don’t have a hard preference for either. I know both and I use both on a regular basis. If I need to convert, I convert. I find that one might be easier or more practical for specific instances or applications, but that’s far from a blanket statement that one is always superior, and I have little tolerance for that kind of thinking.

    • Devadander@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I also convert, neither system bothers me. I truly believe that the pushback against standard measure is that most people who use metric don’t know the conversions well enough to comfortably use them. Most Americans don’t either, hence their resistance to metric. But once you learn how to convert between the systems in your head (roughly) you can navigate both. It’s like being bilingual

      • zzffyfajzkzhnsweqm@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        If America adopted the metric system the need for convertion would go away. So there is no need to be bilingual in this stuff… Use metric and that is it. But you cannot do that as a single person. Laws should be passed.

  • NABDad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I tend to use metric when I’m designing 3D models.

    In woodworking and other linear measurements, I use imperial units.

    Celsius for my 3D printer, but Fahrenheit for weather.

    Driving is miles.

    In cooking I use imperial units.

    Metric for Physics.

    • Admetus@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      When I see imperial units in high school physics I wonder what is the point. We typically use SI units so that constants are the same across the board. I can’t imagine c being anything else other than 3e8 m/s.

      • maniclucky@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I remember my sophomore thermodynamics class in college always seemed artificially hard because the only really difficult problems were ones where they decided to use fucking BTUs.

        • Admetus@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m reading the wiki and that sounds like hell. I prefer the 4200J/kg/K edit: wait that’s just heat capacity, maybe you were stuck in even more hell.

  • stinerman@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I have my phone set to show me the temperature in Celsius. I’ve tried really hard to internalize how far a kilometer is, and have failed so I still have my distance units set to miles.

    • scytale@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I grew up with metric, so I have my temp/weather set to C as well. The only time I deal with F is with my thermostat. I’ve driven long enough to be able to visualize how far a mile is, but I still can’t visualize in feet past human height.

  • Widdershins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    My digital micrometer has a button for switching between regular and metric I don’t give a single fuck

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      5/9 is close enough to half for most purposes, and 30 is close enough to 32 - you can be within a reasonable margin of error converting to F/C with much easier math. Sure it isn’t perfect, but most of the time you don’t need that accuracy in the first place.