The first Jurassic Park movie is all time one of the greatest films ever made with the special effects still holding up to this day. The 2nd film was still very enjoyable in my opinion but it was just a cookie cutter sequel not bad, not good. The 3rd film wasn’t great at all. But compared to the rest of the series the 3rd film is basically the godfather.

As another personal pick the 1st blade movie is a hood classic good. The other 2 not so much.

  • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    At this point Jurassic Park movies are whatever. The first one is awesome, the sequels disappoint.

    I was like 9 when Jurassic Park came out. My impression of any movie will never be topped simply due being a jaded old man now. The Jurassic World movies aren’t as good but it’s still dinosaurs. I’m entertained for a couple hours and that’s enough.

  • SGforce@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Desperado?

    Was pretty popular when it came out but I haven’t heard a peep about it since. The first movie “El Mariachi” was low budget af

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I felt bad for Lost World, because Crighton went out of his way to write a novel that was a sequel to the first movie, not the first book, and then Spielberg just basically ignored it like it never happened.

    I wanted to not see the chameleon dinosaurs, damn it!

    • Klear@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The upside is that the movie is good and the book is great and one won’t spoil the other.

      • hakase@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I thought the book was fine - it felt a lot more annoying to read than the first book for some reason. I was so tired of the baby T-Rex by the end.

    • bob_lemon@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Unlike it’s completely forgettable predecessor, Troll 2 being so bad it’s good arguably makes it a better movie.

      • Test_Tickles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t know what you are talking about… There was the Highlander movie, and then there was the Highlander tv show. That’s all there ever was.

    • limer@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I agree, there are a few sequels I liked on their own merits. But the majority of the ones are just as you said.

      That said, I have a weakness for space ship drama. Can’t be too much of that. So some sequels really don’t need much of a plot, rhyme or reason. I’ll spend my money on them.

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Any of the classic Disney animated movies. First movie is a ripoff of classic fairy tales so most of the heavy lifting writing wise was done for them, the instant Disney has to write the whole thing is when it goes to shit. If it’s “Disney presents [insert fairy tale here] 2” you know it’ll suck.

    • Butterphinger@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Long ago, in a galaxy far away…

      …in this specific area, only pertaining to these 2-3 groups of people and no one else, anywhere else, ever despite there being an entire galaxy to fuck about in and about 20k years worth of lore.

  • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Ghost Rider. First one was goofy action, but still kinda cool. Second one was boring, confusing and lame. But at least it had an exploding bucket-wheel excavator in it, which was the only good scene.