The first Jurassic Park movie is all time one of the greatest films ever made with the special effects still holding up to this day. The 2nd film was still very enjoyable in my opinion but it was just a cookie cutter sequel not bad, not good. The 3rd film wasn’t great at all. But compared to the rest of the series the 3rd film is basically the godfather.

As another personal pick the 1st blade movie is a hood classic good. The other 2 not so much.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    JP went from a Dinosaur Movie to a very generic monster movie with the exact same plot every time.

    Greedy evildoer wants SuperDino for nefarious purposes and must be defeated. Repeat.

  • SGforce@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Desperado?

    Was pretty popular when it came out but I haven’t heard a peep about it since. The first movie “El Mariachi” was low budget af

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Any of the classic Disney animated movies. First movie is a ripoff of classic fairy tales so most of the heavy lifting writing wise was done for them, the instant Disney has to write the whole thing is when it goes to shit. If it’s “Disney presents [insert fairy tale here] 2” you know it’ll suck.

  • osanna@lemmy.vg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    honestly, star wars. I’m a HUGE star wars fan, but they’re the same movie repeatedly. blow up death star, blow up bigger death star. blow up BIGGEST death star. BAM. 9 movies.

    • weew@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      If you take each trilogy as a set, sure.

      But Empire and Return were both amazing films that one-upped the original.

      And I think Clones was better than Phantom.

      The final trilogy was a straight fucking cliff both by itself and in comparison to the other trilogies.

    • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Hmm… Kind of a weird take considering the Prequels had no blowing up of any super weapons, and the Sequels had only one, in the first film.

      • Test_Tickles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t know what you are talking about… There was the Highlander movie, and then there was the Highlander tv show. That’s all there ever was.

    • limer@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I agree, there are a few sequels I liked on their own merits. But the majority of the ones are just as you said.

      That said, I have a weakness for space ship drama. Can’t be too much of that. So some sequels really don’t need much of a plot, rhyme or reason. I’ll spend my money on them.

    • Butterphinger@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Long ago, in a galaxy far away…

      …in this specific area, only pertaining to these 2-3 groups of people and no one else, anywhere else, ever despite there being an entire galaxy to fuck about in and about 20k years worth of lore.

  • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Ghost Rider. First one was goofy action, but still kinda cool. Second one was boring, confusing and lame. But at least it had an exploding bucket-wheel excavator in it, which was the only good scene.

  • No_Money_Just_Change@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Pirates of the carabian.
    The first was a masterpiece in comedy.
    The second and third were good but I would still rate them slightly worse each gen.
    I am indifferent to 4 and hate 5

    • pjwestin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I actually thought 4 was better than 2 and 3. Not that 4 was very good, but I thought 2 and 3 suffered from an attempt to, “trilogize,” the series and make it a grand epic. It was clear by the end of the third movie that they didn’t know where they were going with all of the plot threads they’d set up like Calypso, the Brethren Court, the Jack/Elizabeth/Will love triangle they were hinting at…just way to many ideas and very little payoff. At least 4 told a coherent story in one movie, even if it wasn’t a very good story.

    • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The first movie was a complete package that told a story well, and where it ended was the right place to end it all.

      But of course, money.

      Really tarnished my feelings about the first movie and I don’t think I could even watch it the same way anymore.

    • fireweed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I thought 3 was a deal better than 2. 2 was generic Hollywood schlock that dragged in the middle; 3 at least attempted some interesting things, and even bordered on artsy at times.

      1 was, of course, the best. Haven’t seen 4 and 5.

      • Zahille7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I see 2 and 3 as one continuous story. Lord Cutler Beckett is basically the personification of capitalism and industrialism. He spends his time killing or taking over these “free” people who all do whatever they want whenever they want with no masters and no one telling them what to do, and subjugating them under the yoke of the changing new world.

        Idk I’m kinda high right now. I like Beckett as a villain, because he represents certain aspects of the human spirit and he is at the end just a dude. He’s not an immortal squid-man and he’s not an undead were-skeleton.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    It would be far more interesting to ask, what movie franchise DOESN’T get worse with each new film.

    • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      John Wick? They are not like the best movies in the world but they do get better.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Alien at least had the second film better than the first, which was a hell of an accomplishment since the first film was great. Fortunately they never even made any movies after the second one.

      • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Come on, now. The third was OK, the fourth was enjoyable, and Romulus was phenomenal. It was basically “let’s take the best bits from Alien and Aliens and stick them together” and they did it brilliantly.

        • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          C’mon, killing off Newt and Hicks at the start of the third was unconscionable. It’s in the same category as “somehow, Palpatine returned”.

          • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            “Somehow Palpatine returned” is lazy writing forced on them due to Snoke dying in the previous film.

            Hicks and Newt dying is perfectly reasonable in the world the action takes place in.

        • detren@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          If you go by release date then that can’t be true considering the prequels (even though I love them). TFA was also so bland compared to the rest. The Last Jedi was the only decent one since the original trilogy imo.

          But oh my god rise of skywalker is so fucking bad.

          • BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            rise of skywalker was so terrible they should have let rian johnson just do his thing again, even if people hated it like TLJ at least it would have had some thought put into it

        • osanna@lemmy.vg
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          i liked TFA. It was a decent flick. But then they just got so. much. worse.

          • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            TFA would’ve been a great third film in a trilogy. It absolutely sucks balls as the second film. It killed practically all the story lines from the first, leaving basically nothing for the third, including the main bad guy. Hux would’ve never been a good “ultimate enemy”, and if Kylo Ren became one, it would completely overturn everything the previous eight films worked on.

            • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              TLJ would’ve been a great third film in a trilogy. It absolutely sucks balls as the second film. It killed practically all the story lines from the first, leaving basically nothing for the third, including the main bad guy. Hux would’ve never been a good “ultimate enemy”, and if Kylo Ren became one, it would completely overturn everything the previous eight films worked on.

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Aliens, Terminator 2, The Dark Knight are the first three that come to mind - but yes, in general sequels tend to be inferior.