I see marriage as a traditional legal binding that can alter your life significantly depending on your state and country.

You might see it differently. What does marriage mean to you?

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Love my wife to bits but I only see marriage as a legal contract. Insurance is easier, travel is easier, everything is so much easier. It’s what turned me to equal marriage opportunity activist - there’s no reason why this privilege should remain only for 2 different gendered people, that’s just incredibly cruel. Ideally this privilege shouldn’t exist at all.

    • JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Wait a minute why is insurance and travel and everything so much easier when married? I’m single and insurance is cheap and travel is quick and easy, everything else is maddeningly lonely and sometimes I need three hands but I only have two, but other than that what do you mean being married is so much easier?

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I meant mostly relative to just being a couple not single.

        You can add co-dependents to all types of insurance (health, travel etc.) which is easier and cheaper for married people than it is for a couple. As for travel itself - visa and all travel bureaucracy is always easier for married people. My wife is Thai and much of the world is super racist against Thai passports so we just piggyback of my EU passport in most countries and of her Thai passport in ASEAN countries - it’s a real game changer. Not to mention how differently you are being treated by all bureaucratic and security checks. Being married is like living in the fast lane when it comes to bureaucracy.

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Lifelong romantic partnership with another person. I don’t believe in it personally and I don’t like that there’s legal/church involvement with it.

    Not interested myself as I don’t think people should be as reliant on each other as much as married people tend to be. Always seems to be one side or the other gets really fucked over when it splits up for whatever reason.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Its a commitment. Pure and simple. You and another are going to live together and figure things out together come what may.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Having a small barrier (divorce) is not a meaningful form of comitment and if anything I’d wager it does more actual societal harm than good.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        commitment is an individual thing. it could all be ceremony and it would not mattter. It sounds like your asking what the legal definition of marriage is for a particular country.

        • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          No i just dont think it’s a good metric for comitment and doesn’t encapsulate the spirit of committed relationship. It might actually distract from achieving real meaningful comitment as people do the predefine ceremony which is not very meaningful compared to a more personal ritual and bonding.

  • FellowEnt@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    As a guy currently going through a divorce, I see it very differently to how I did before she left. Previously I saw it as a public commitment and celebration of love, and making vows to each other. Now I see it as a bullshit waste of time and money. I was cynical before (not religious, didnt see muxh point) but went through with it because it was something she wanted.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I was cynical before (not religious, didnt see muxh point) but went through with it because it was something she wanted.

      not to throw salt in your wound, but perhaps this was your first mistake?

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    What it means to me is different from what it did for me.

    I didn’t marry my ex, we had kids so were a family regardless and I didn’t want to be a wife just a mom. I am glad we never married.

    My now husband REALLY wanted to get married, like a wedding and the whole thing, he had already kids too, from an ex-wife (both their bio kids and his stepkids, court gave him custody of all of them and he adopted the ones he could). I caved and told him ask in 2 years, he did.

    What it did was like some old timey upper class marriage shit, combined families & created a dynasty. I liked it because “stepmom/stepdad” can do things like school pickup that “mom’s boyfriend” can’t. And my kids & his kids got this amazing network of siblings, they all like each other. And I got a great MIL & FIL, and together my husband & I make kind of a lot of money when before we were each supporting a family alone, and struggling.

    So basically because we already had families, getting married made us one big family. Which now makes me think of it like that, when before all I saw was the man-owns-woman shit and wanted no part of that.

  • toomanypancakes@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    To me, it’s my promise that I love the other person, plan on doing so forever, and I want to spend the rest of our lives together. I wouldn’t have gotten married unless wanted to support them in all of their goals, help them through all of their troubles, and enjoy all the moments in between.

    The legal stuff is all secondary in my view.

  • qt0x40490FDB@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Marriage is a promise for to people to people to keep dating as long as they both feel like it.

  • neatchee@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Marriage is a state-sanctioned merger of assets and rights. It provides a legal authorization for decision making related to your spouse, shared property ownership rights, rights regarding power of attorney in an emergency, and tax benefits.

    Everything else is religious/social ceremony and can be achieved without the need for marriage certification.

    I know several people who didn’t “believe in marriage” until their SO was in the hospital and they weren’t allowed to visit or make decisions for them. Pretty horrible watching the estranged parent or second cousin making decisions about the health of your 10+ year partner, against your wishes, with no recourse.

    • hot_mocha_decaf@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is a big reason my spouse and I married after already being together for 25 years. She is estranged from her family as well. She was in a car accident, she was unhurt but the car was totaled. So we got married in April.

    • timestatic@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I mean you can also give your partner a letter of authorization to make medical decisions for you in case you aren’t able to make decisions yourself. You dont really need marriage for that

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The point, to me, is using the government to tell hospitals what to do. I don’t want my parents making big decisions for me - I want the family I chose, my spouse, to do that.

        • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yes. And then sign another authorization for each other topic - another for disposal of my property if I die, one for my funeral preferences, one to pick up my prescriptions, and hope I don’t forget any.

          Or, courthouse, one time, 15 minutes, and done.

          A marriage license acts like a super convenient combination of othet legal documents.

    • Hegar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Almost word for word what i was going to say.

      I’m in a committed, 9year relationship, we’re in our 40s and married in all but name.

      The state can fuck right off.

      We know what we have and no piece of paper steeped in millenia of patriarchal property ownership could ever affect or authorize that.

      • three@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Based retard gonna watch mommy and daddy pull the plug on their little girl while you cry in the waiting room.

        • Hegar@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          It doesn’t work like that, i’ve already been allowed to attend at serious medical events without her being able to say so.

  • ComradePenguin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    A big set of financial legal guarantees that protect both parties.

    And also an agreement to make it harder to leave during conflict. Which is something both parties agree to when not in a very emotional state.

    Making it harder to leave is controversial, since it in practice goes against consent and the wishes of either party during conflict. Since sex can’t be forced in marriage anymore (luckily), marriage is an acceptable practice, in my opinion.

    Force through the use of financial pressure from one party to stay together is in no way acceptable though. Both parties should be willingly in the relationship long term. Financials will however always be a factor, since it is cheaper and more beneficial to be two.

  • eightpix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I had intended to not.

    Then, after a turn at living together with my partner in an Islamic country — where we were not allowed to officially cohabit — we realized that our rights to watch each other’s backs were made way simpler by being married.

    So we got married.

    Had we always lived in a country that recognized cohabitation or common-law relationships, we might have not. Had our next sojourn not been in a predominantly Catholic country, we might have not. Had we more role models who didn’t, we might have not. Had we moved home earlier, we might have not.

    But we did. It was 12 years ago.

    Bottom line, we don’t find it burdensome; or that we are locked in a prison together. We care for one another. We drive one another crazy. We have the same fights over and over. We support each other and keep track of each other’s families, friends, medical conditions, and car keys. It’s nice. It’s mundane. It’s comfortable. It’s practical.

    Getting out would be a giant pain in the everything. And expensive.

    We don’t wield our rings against one another. We don’t demand “rights” from one another because we’re married. We don’t have extraordinary unspoken expectations of one another. We accept, value, and console one another. We’re a unit in this fucked up place.

    People are crazy. I’m crazy. She’s the crazy I’m used to and can interact with.

    I’m too old for new crazy.

    Granted, she’s certainly gaining more by being married to me than I am being married to her. But, we don’t keep score either.

    TL;DR — comments in bold.

      • eightpix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        First and foremost, she gains cleaning. Everything except bathrooms.

        Half the cooking. She has dietary restrictions, I don’t. We don’t eat outside of home often. Except phở bò.

        Every form of maintenance. Cars, computers, all machines and objects with moving parts.

        Weekends away with friends. I never question and I never say no.

        Few hard feelings when she’s temperamental.

        What do I gain?

        I’ll probably live longer because she makes me go to the doctor, the dentist, physiotherapy, and reduces my cheese and bacon intake. But not salt. She loves salt.

        I gain perspective. I don’t occupy i high tower where I know everything and remain academically distant and untouched by the world. I gain knowledge of all the books I don’t (and wouldn’t) read. I gain access to emotional and psychological non-fiction content.

        Finally, I gain the companionship of someone who lets me do my wierd. Nothing kinky or malicious or wasteful or destructive — just unreasonably high standards and unreasonably low output. No blame for it as long as bills are paid and food is in the fridge.

        She’d like to see me try to shoot the moon, and I love her for it. We’ll see. I can’t even put together a string of Lemmy posts worthy of acclaim.