Water usage is probably my biggest. Living in a high desert, my wife and MIL see no problem with filling one side of the sink with hot soapy water to wash a few dishes because “that’s just how I’ve always done it”, to watering the grass and plants for hours. All of this makes me mental.

  • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I won’t rape, torture, and murder vulnerable individuals. Call me radical but if I can be happy, healthy, and enjoy life without doing those things to animals, I’m not going to fucking do those things to animals.

    • NostraDavid@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Everyone deserves health care.

      Even people who don’t live in your country? Because that’s going to be a strain on your healthcare system.

      Yes, yes, it’s a nice ideal, but when the rubber meets the road, shit can hit the fan, which means healthcare for the FIFO, and the rich.

      If it’s “everyone in my circle deserves healthcare”, then it’s very realistic. “Everyone in my country” might even work as well. “Everyone in the world deserves healthcare in my country” not so much.

  • peacefulpixel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    there is literally no possible usecase for Generative AI, it is modern day snake oil. nothing could possibly justify adding yet another “technology” to the list of existing tech that is already scorching our earth and enslaving people. it was created by the CIA to bolster the surveillance state and i have considerably less respect for someone when i find out that they use it for any reason at all.

    • NostraDavid@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      there is literally no possible usecase for Generative AI

      Demonstrably false: GenCast, a Diffusion model (and thus GenAI), is freely available here as source code to train it yourself if you so wish. ERA5 data is free to download.

      It’s cheaper and more accurate in both result and resolution to run a classic Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) model.

      I will fully agree that all the slop that’s being generated is shite and a waste of time though.

  • Bronzor@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Religious people are one the biggest reasons as to why we are where we are today. Anyone that tries to “respect” these delusions are also culpable. It’s the best invention to sedate the masses in their cage since sliced manna.

      • Bronzor@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        “Existential belief/claim in delusion with no evidence or basis in reality; A tool for the rich to exploit and sedate the masses.” That’s what I hope to change the definition to when people wake up. Obviously since definitions are descriptive and not prescriptive that isn’t what it is now. “An organized supernatural belief in a god/gods in regard to the creation of the universe.” Is what I would assume more fits how people use the word today. Even then I feel that excludes delusions such as Buddhism or individual ‘spiritual’ delusions.

        Skip to your proselytizing, what delusion are you Pascal’s wagering your life on?

        • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Right, everyone who disagrees with you is a delusional sky-fairy worshipper. I’m not religious, dude. I’m also not suffering from religious trauma. Clean your shit up.

          Clearly you CANNOT define what religion even is. But boy do you ever have strong opinions about something YOU CANNOT EVEN DEFINE. Your damage is just flowing out from every sentence. Your rage cannot change the world, but once you fix yourself, you can start to try.

    • chobeat@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      How do you explain to yourself that religious and spiritual people are the drivers of mainstream politics and new political ideologies, while atheists/modernists/disenchanted are pretty much either irrelevant or clinging desperately to their position of vaning power, paralyzed, and often depressed?

      • Bronzor@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        As another comment said this is a fallacy. This detracts from my original argument, and assumes I stated any of this in my main point. If you have questions about the argument ask questions about the direct things I said in my argument. Not shit I did not say an inkling about. Your making assumptions on positions I do not have.

        Let me bite for the sake of biting.

        Now if I take your loaded question as a claim, I would like a source for the hasty generalization “atheists/modernists/disenchanted are pretty much either irrelevant or clinging desperately to their position of vaning power, paralyzed, and often depressed” Part. Show me the stats.

        “Religious and spiritual people are the drivers of mainstream politics and new political ideologies” That is sooo rich. Religious people have been at the front lines of halting progress across the spectrum. I guess you are right they are the drivers of mainstream political change, not good political change might I add. Whenever they do change for the good it’s because real progressives fought tooth and nail to change it on a state level. Only then do these churches catch up, and even then you have members that don’t agree/believe in the change. Some key examples of movements religions have been heinous on: Woman’s suffrage, Slavery Abolitionism, Abortion, LGBTQIA+ rights, Gaza, Access contraception/sex education, the list goes fucking on and on. Don’t even get me started on the dark money organized religions put in to get vile legislation passed.

        I’m not trying to assume anything but the way you throw depression in the mix puts a bad taste in my mouth. Like it has anything to do with the other things you stated, religious people are depressed too. It isn’t secularist exclusive. The way religion handles depression is “deal with it god knew you could handle it”, “that’s not depression it’s the devil”, or even the more extreme “depression/suicide is a sin”. So if depressed religious people aren’t coming out and talking about their mental health all to often compared to atheists it doesn’t surprise me. I’ll give you a chance to correct the record and we can move on, as I do not want to detract from our argument.

        Religions allow for people to discriminate just on the premise of “well it’s what I believe”. They think because it’s their belief it doesn’t have to be demonstrated or tested. Why is your religion/belief true? “Because my ancient text of choice says it’s true” ok well why is your religious text of choice true? “Because my religion/belief says it’s true”.

  • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    LED headlights can fuck right off, and if you defend them then you are either an asshole or a dumbass who couldn’t think about it for twenty seconds and see the impact.

    • motruck@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      You can buy night glasses to help with this bullshit. They don’t reduce the shine so much but they stop you from being blinded after being hit in the face with what is bright even for high beams.

  • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Just in response to your annoyance, I have found women ive been around tend to have more of a “fuck other people and the climate” attitude than most of the guys (its usually not that abrasive, just more of a “why wouldn’t I water my grass? We have the water” attitude). Especially if there’s kids, they dont care about anything else (that’s just biology I guess). Please dont take this as sexist, it is just something ive observed.

    I get very annoyed with people wasting unnessesarily and using amazon.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      my favorite is the ‘love to travel’ types. point out that their trips to antarctic are toxic for the environment there and they lose it on you. because cute pics with penguins are worth it!

      • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah that is unfortunate. I like traveling too but usually drive. No matter what you do travelling is bad for climate.

        What really pisses me off is asshole tourists who litter or otherwise make nature unenjoyable (massive douche hiking while blaring annoying music out of a Bluetooth pill)

        Then again billionaires fly their jets to work every day and burn up millions of kwh daily for their 5 properties they own. So I think we can have a couple travel vacations a year.

  • BranBucket@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Neil Postman was right.

    Our educational models and methods are changing for the worse.

    TV and the internet are terrible mediums for public or political discourse and this has exacerbated many of our existing issues.

    Our culture has become more shallow and has started to lack something profound because of how we utilize technology for education, business, and entertainment.

    Things will not improve until we change our relationship with these technologies.

    EDIT: several words.

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    People should be able to transfer their vote of their first preference didn’t win. Sorry democrats, being forced to vote for you isnt democracy.

  • asdasd201@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    J. Posadas was probably right about building communism after a nuclear war.

    From what I see, my people would rather starve to death under their familiar oppressive regime than to organize a communist revolution.

    I can’t blame them though. We are in a geography where there is no politic and economic stability.

  • brynden_rivers_esq@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    The Sound of Music is not a Christmas movie.

    My wife and her family and a whole bunch of Canadians all think it is and I am so flummoxed by it.

    • beSyl@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      No way. Alternative:

      Streets should be one lane maximum, 1 lame only. The rest of the space should be divided for trees, bikes, and people.

      Fuck cars.

    • paequ2@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Growing up in a small town, this is exactly what we did. I was absolutely shocked to learn that people ride bikes ON THE ROAD! Right next to the big metal death machines!! 😱

      I see why bikes on the road make sense for high density areas… but it sure seems weird in smaller towns.

      • angrystego@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Sidewalks should be wide enough for both a bike and a pedestrian lane to fit in safely, ideally with some paving protection for the pedestrians. Bikes in the car traffic are dangerous.