So if someone declares you food, is it now moral for them to slit your throat and butcher you?
- 0 Posts
- 21 Comments
Nah, it’s morally wrong and if you are honest you will actually agree. Let me explain:
Let’s set a moral baseline that we both agree with. Shooting a random person that has done no harm to anyone in the head without their explicit consent is morally bad, yes?
Now, what is different about, say, a pig that makes it less than morally bad to kill the pig? If we then apply that difference to that random human again, is it now less than morally bad to kill them?
The honest answer (and one that I can at least accept) is: there is no such difference.
What is your answer?
I was directly adressing the points brought up by the other person. What did you contribute?
Killing animals for taste pleasure is morally wrong, weather it happens in a factory farm or on that mythical uncles farm that tottaly loves and pets his animals to death.
And yes, it’s ok to kill plants because they do not feel pain. They can’t feel pain because they lack a nervous system to do so as well as an evolutionary reason for pain to exist.
And even if plants feel pain, it takes MUCH more plants to feed animals to then feed humans.
🦄🦄🦄@feddit.orgto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•"look! the #signalapp income and salaries report for 2024 dropped!" #startpocketwatching #opentechnologyfund #usgovernmentsponsored
0·3 days agoAh another hitpiece on Signal huh? They must be doing a lot right.
I will never vote for neolibs again even with a european paint job.
🦄🦄🦄@feddit.orgto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Apple rolls out OS-level age verification in latest iOS 26.4 dev beta
0·6 days agoCompile it on what tho?
🦄🦄🦄@feddit.orgto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•What's a TV series that you really, really liked and would enthusiastically recommend?
0·7 days agoHave you watched it recently? There are a couple of episodes (foremost the one with the trans woman, who is of course not played by a trans actor) that have NOT aged well. Especially when you look at the creators response to the criticisms.
Dunno, just soured the whole series for me.
Cool so we will remove the impediments of those structural changes (or rather the heads of those impediments) first and then we can have structural change :)
Nahhh fam we gonna pour concrete down their lil air holes hihi
Not just support, but violently enforce.
I have two!
-
willful procreation is morally bad
-
if you aren’t vegan, you can’t be anarchist
-
Do you have that without the icons? :3
🦄🦄🦄@feddit.orgto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•AI Can Now Easily Unmask Your Secret Online Life (Even If You Use a Fake Name)
0·13 days agoDamn :3 I am fucked :3
🦄🦄🦄@feddit.orgto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•One billion identity records exposed in unsecured ID verification database | Biometric Update
0·17 days agoRookie numbers! Let’s have “”“age”“”-verification globally and drive those numbers way up!
🦄🦄🦄@feddit.orgto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Dbzero has Defederated from Feddit.org following its Governance post about the later's "Zionist Bar Problem" English
0·21 days agoNotice how the ragebait, communication destroying comments and got’chas are coming from a handful of users in this thread (Cowbee, Riverside, etc.) Ask yourself why they would want to separate the left and who benefits from that.
Edit: ah and like clockwork, the “I now want to communicate reasonably” spiel. Not falling for that one.
Wow seems like all the bad actors got caught by this.
Notice how the criticisms are based on a fundamental lie: that feddit.org is a zionist instance. Without that lie all of the agitators “arguments” crumble to the sad leftist-dividing dust that they are.
Calling for death to nations (and their civilians) is a call for genocide. I hope non-extremists can see that.
Also, as a tip: don’t answer the trolls and agitators. Leave them hanging, screaming into the wind.


Gender affirming care for cis people seems to be accepted way more easily.