l don’t undersand why we Iive in a worId where capital I and Iowercase l are allowed to Iook near identical. PeopIe are paid to design and seIect fonts and they have aII agreed on this Iudicrous convention.

Why has this happened? And is there anything I can do about it as an individuaI or as part of a coIIective?

I can’t even do thorn-master Sxan’s thing and insert a character code because U+026A, ɪ, is too damn small.

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    banned from the Internet

    Do you know what the Internet (World Wide Web) even means here, and that this is decided by fonts, and to a lesser extent by Unicode? You can use a so-called 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑓 font on your website, and it’s still the default on most desktop browsers. You can even force websites to render different fonts on your browser!

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    probably because sans serif is literally a lack of features in typography design sense which was a shortsight in computer sense.

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    ᎳᎻᎪᎢ ᎢᎻᎬ ᎻᎬᏞᏞ? Ꮯꮋꭼꭱoꮶꭼꭼ ꮮꭺꮯꮶꮪ “ɪ” ꭲoo?!

    Ꮲꭼꭱꮋꭺꮲꮪ ꭲꮋɪꮪ ꮃoꭱꮶꮪ: 𐊦𐙫𐠳ⵊ

    ⵊ’m not sure…

    𝐈 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐥𝐬𝐨 𝐭𝐲𝐩𝐞 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬,or in FULL WIDTH!

    AƖternativeƖy, Ɩet’s differentiate the "Ɩ"s

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Given the confused nature of your post, best look up Unicode, serif and sans-serif before reading on…

        First line is mostly Cherokee script, whose alphabet goes ᎠᎡᎢᎣᎤᎥᎦᎧᎨᎱᎪᎫᎬᎭᎮᎯ… Many letters resemble English serif ones: ᎪᏴᏟᎠᎬᎰᏀᎻᎥᎫᏦᏞᎷᎨᎾᏢᏩᎡᏚᎢᏌᏙᎳᏯᎩᏃ. With some clever synonym selection (the fuck the hell) and a replacement for the compromised ones like O or (unfortunately also) I, one can use it as a serif typeface wiith small caps.

        The only uppercase, explicitly serif I in Unicode are “special fonts” (Latin, sometimes Greek letter sets) accessible via an online converter or Android app. Some are meant for formulas where serif is the norm, therefore there’s

        • 𝖬𝖺𝗍𝗁 𝗌𝖺𝗇𝗌
          • may look like Helvetica or indistinguishable from the surrounding sans(-serif) font
        • 𝗠𝗮𝘁𝗵 𝘀𝗮𝗻𝘀 𝗯𝗼𝗹𝗱
        • 𝘔𝘢𝘵𝘩 𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘤
        • 𝙈𝙖𝙩𝙝 𝙨𝙖𝙣𝙨 𝙗𝙤𝙡𝙙 𝙞𝙩𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙘
        • 𝐌𝐚𝐭𝐡 𝐛𝐨𝐥𝐝 𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐟
          • closest to forced serif typeface: as mentioned above, no “Math serif” exists
        • 𝑀𝑎𝑡ℎ 𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑐 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑓
          • the “h” came first (Planck constant, always italics) and looks different in some fonts
        • 𝑴𝒂𝒕𝒉 𝒃𝒐𝒍𝒅 𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒄 𝒔𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒇
        • ℳ𝒶𝓉𝒽 𝓈𝒸𝓇𝒾𝓅𝓉
        • 𝓜𝓪𝓽𝓱 𝓼𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓹𝓽 𝓫𝓸𝓵𝓭
        • 𝔐𝔞𝔱𝔥 𝔉𝔯𝔞𝔨𝔱𝔲𝔯
        • 𝕸𝖆𝖙𝖍 𝕱𝖗𝖆𝖐𝖙𝖚𝖗 𝕭𝖔𝖑𝖉
        • 𝙼𝚊𝚝𝚑 𝚖𝚘𝚗𝚘𝚜𝚙𝚊𝚌𝚎
        • 𝕄𝕒𝕥𝕙 𝕕𝕠𝕦𝕓𝕝𝕖-𝕤𝕥𝕣𝕠𝕜𝕖
          • completing the alphabet of letters denoting number sets like ℕ, ℤ, ℚ, ℝ, ℂ…

        Then, there’s

        • Fullwidth
          • width of CJK characters, uniquely includes some punctuation
        • Ⓒⓘⓡⓒⓛⓔⓓ
        • 🅝🅔🅖🅐🅣🅘🅥🅔 🅒🅘🅡🅒🅛🅔🅓
        • 🅂🅀🅄🄰🅁🄴🄳
        • 🅽🅴🅶🅰🆃🅸🆅🅴 🆂🆀🆄🅰🆁🅴🅳
          • A, B and O (blood types) may be red (emoji presentation)
        • 🇷​🇪​🇬​🇮​🇴​🇳​🇦​🇱​ 🇮​🇳​🇩​🇮​🇨​🇦​🇹​🇴​🇷​🇸​
          • “flag parts”, vary wildly by platform, usually blue

        And ᴘsᴇᴜᴅᴏᴀʟᴘʜᴀʙᴇᴛs, made by repurposing other characters. Often incomplete, like my Cherokee attempt at serif. Explained on the QAZ website linked above.

        Also, I used

        • U+2D4A ⵊ TIFINAGH LETTER YAZH
        • U+10833 𐠳 CYPRIOT SYLLABLE WE
        • U+1066B 𐙫 LINEAR A SIGN A319
        • U+102A6 𐊦 CARIAN LETTER LD
        • U+0196 Ɩ LATIN CAPITAL LETTER IOTA
          • unlike the above 4 Is, almost guaranteed to be supported by the default font on any reasonably modern platform

        I’m looking forward to the year 𑃦𑃰𑃟𑃰/𞄡𞅀𞄬𞅀/𞄕𞅀𞄧𞅀, the next one whose number can be approximated in a whimsical way by characters in the Sora Sompeng and Nyiakeng Puachue Hmong scripts, respectively. The number of devices supporting them will have grown by then, too.

        • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          For yall’s information, nothing typed with those characters will be searchable in the browser, an app, or via website’s search — unless apps and websites take special measures to account for such tricks, by keeping a copy of the text normalized to the regular English alphabet.

          /cc @schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works

          • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Or accessible via screen reader…

            The “normalization” of pseudoalphabets is tricky, the normal transliteration of the “alphabet” I made with Cherokee syllabics is “Go⁠yv⁠tli⁠a⁠gv⁠ho⁠nah⁠mi⁠v⁠gu⁠tso⁠tle⁠lu⁠ge⁠na⁠tlv⁠wa⁠e⁠du⁠i⁠sa⁠do⁠la⁠ya⁠gi⁠no”.It is necessary to maintain a database of homoglyphs and other lookalikes for this.

            Also, commercial platforms know it’s a way to bypass filters and tend to outright block comments/emails/etc. that use Unicode in unintended ways.

  • Lumidaub@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    So that we can be like

    ✋ Weird AI music
    👉 Weird Al music 🪗

    Jokes aside, you’re right. Comics commonly use all-caps fonts that do make that difference.

    • jqubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        He did a good job of enjoying the misunderstanding without being condescending. That’s so funny and also terrifying :)

  • Enchanted@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    The English language loves ambiguity. Look at all the words with multiple meanings yet spelled the same way, even though we haven’t exhausted all 3-letter word possibilities.

    • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      But despite our love for ambiguity, we have maintained the disctinction between I and l in print (and probably manuscript) for all of our history. It’s only since the invention of web and personal computers that we’ve introduced this ambiguity.

      • Enchanted@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Sans-serif fonts predate the internet, but not by much. Their popularity started in the 1920s because they look “cleaner” and more modern. I tend to agree with this sentiment, I wouldn’t want to look at serif fonts all day long.

  • CallMeAl (like Alan)@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    MncqHiUnJzrmVVc.png

    And is there anything I can do about it…

    You can choose a different font.

    As you can see in the included screenshot, piefed includes a choice of fonts including one that includes I with serifs. Certainly many other apps do as well. Or you can force it at the browser level I would think.

    • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Nice. Ok. I’ll look into that for my various apps and what nots. But don’t most webpages serve you whatever font they want and it would be a trainwreck to force a font change when the page hasn’t been designed for it?

      • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Vast majority of webpages shouldn’t break, I’m saying that as a web programmer. I myself override fonts on a couple sites that I use regularly (namely Wikipedia). Where it might go wrong is in edge cases, e.g. small special snippets of text like captions for images, which can be designed to fit in limited space and use condensed fonts.

        Not sure that browsers allow overriding all fonts on webpages (ever since sites specify specific fonts instead of just ‘serif’ and ‘sans-serif’), but there are likely extensions that can do that dynamically and forcefully. I do that via CSS in the Stylus extension, but that’s specific to particular sites and can’t work everywhere.

      • [deleted]@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Basic website design is supposed to allow the user to set their own fonts and font sizes along with formatting based on screen size and orientation. Yes, a lot of pages are designed terribly and might break, but that is because they made a shitty website and not because you chose to use the internet the way it is supposed to work.

        Changing out for a font that looks very similar to Ariel but with easier to differentiate capital I and lower case l should work fine.

      • scytale@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        You can set a specific font in your browser settings and force it to use that font on websites.

        • adarza@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          this is what that looks like on this page.
          .

          you can also use stylus (a browser addon) and a userstyle for all or specific domains.

          and… firefox’s “reader mode”, if available for the page, also has a basic (serif, sans, mono) font choice.

      • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Most websites should at least support specifying a generic “serif” preference and then they pick a specific one, however you should also be able to force a local font via either browser options or extension

  • blipcast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    I think it might be easier to use a serif font. Where are you trying to make this change? At the browser level? OS? Or somewhere else? You should be able to make that change, but the specific configuration will vary.

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Well, that’s kinda how it should be, right? People generally don’t have uniform preferences for anything

        I imagine you wouldn’t be particularly pleased if someone else decided to go the other way and enforced you using a font where 1liI|!j all looked identical because they wanted that instead for some reason.

        Similarly, serifed fonts are regarded as being more readable for most people (though this is apparently also increasingly up for debate), however some dyslexic or neuro-divergent people can apparently really struggle with them compared to alternatives.

        • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          I imagine you wouldn’t be particularly pleased if someone else decided to go the other way and enforced you using a font where 1liI|!j all looked identical because they wanted that instead for some reason.

          You think this is a slam dunk argument, but, yeah, maybe I would be willing to put up with that if I could add serifs to my I’s. The internet is built on consent, no? If they want to force that distinction on me for what they write, I can choose to not read them or to block them.

          Sort of by the by, there is a user that goes by IllIllI or somesuch. It is delightfully irritating.

          • 9point6@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            The internet is built on consent

            That’s kinda my point though, if someone wanted text to all look a certain way on their devices, someone choosing to work around that for whatever reason is doing so without consent, right? Blocking is a reactive act, rather than consent which is proactive.

            If someone came into your house and painted all your walls vomit green because they like the colour better than whatever you’ve currently got, that’s not really just a consent issue is it?

            • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              If someone wanted text to all look a certain way on their devices, someone choosing to work around that for whatever reason is doing so without consent, right?

              Yeah, that’s approaching the situation on my Samsung tablet. I have to buy fonts from them if I want to change them.

              But I’m saying why is my right to present my words they way I want to present them not at all considered? I don’t consent to arial font. Maybe my words are best expressed in Times New Roman.

              I know the answer is MySpace–giving people absolute freedom led to absolute chaos…

              • 9point6@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 days ago

                At the risk of creating a monster, if how your text looks is more important to you than the content itself, I guess you could render all your text to an image and share that. Though, I’d suspect you’d end up in quite a few blocklists because people generally prefer to have their own preferences rather than someone else’s on their own devices.

                Regarding the Samsung tablet font situation, a few things:

                Firstly why they are sold, commercial fonts kinda generally cost money, I won’t get into how Monotype is basically operating as a cartel, but foundries own the designs of fonts and they license them to operating systems at a cost. Apple and Microsoft bundle the cost of the licenses in with the price of their software/devices, Samsung decided to not do that and pass on the fee to the users that specifically wanted them. Not saying it’s good or anything, just explaining why.

                Secondly, doesn’t Samsung offer some free? I’ve not used a Samsung device in years so I might be misremembering, it wasn’t an incredible selection, but there were a few fonts for each of the main typeface categories.

                Finally, if there isn’t a current root exploit already for the device, it never used to be too long before someone figured it out. Once that’s possible it was always pretty trivial to add in custom font files IIRC. Have a dive on the XDA forums and see if anyone’s working on your device

      • blipcast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        What other people see is their problem. Plenty of people don’t mind or prefer sans-serif. Ensuring your designs look the same on everyone’s machine has been a problem since the dawn of the Internet, and you aren’t going to solve it by replacing 'I’s with a special character. Worse still, if a user’s font don’t doesn’t include that character, they’ll end up with an ugly ‘�’ or something similar.

        You need to decide where you lie on the control vs flexibility spectrum, because currently you want it both ways. You either make static images of text formatted exactly how you want (and adding alt text!!), or you let users view the text as they wish.

        I find it really strange how you’ve been confronted with locked down text from Samsung, and your first instinct is to try to inflict that same thing on others.

        • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          I don’t understand your confusion. There are three actors: the author, the reader, and the OS (of the reader and the sender).

          You are saying readers should have full control, without exactly justifying it.

          I’m offering up a counter-proposal that the author should have full control (or at least control of the font).

          We had this argument with Mark Twain’s use of n*. If authors intent theoretically matters about a word, why not a font? Though obviously a font is less consequential.

          I’m not seriously arguing for author-determined fonts, though (see, again, MySpace), but it is worth considering in passing.

          As far Samsung or Microsoft forcing a font on us as users, we can probably agree to be against that.