I replied to someone saying that the USSR defeated the Nazis saying that it was a group effort. Got into an argument and called a Nazi repeatedly because “I was mad that the USSR defeated the Nazis and hated them for it” which is ridiculous. This isn’t the first time that’s happened on Lemmy. What’s up with that?

  • cm0002@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s just the admins of lemmy.ml for ya, here’s a megathread on them

    You’ll get banned for showing support for Ukraine or going against Russian narratives or if you remind them of Putlers promise to not invade or just shit talking Putler in general

    Or calling out propaganda sites - https://lemmy.world/post/32776038 | https://lemmy.world/post/33416433 | https://lemmy.world/post/34051329 | https://lemmy.world/post/35919522

    Or so much more, I actually haven’t updated the megathread in a few months, but there’s more recent stuff on !meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works

    ETA - Join the lemmy.ml boycott today and help foster a better Lemmy-verse! No more posts, comments (except to counter their propaganda ofc!) or upvotes on any comms on the Lemmy.ml instance! To make this easy you can do an instance block at Settings > Block Tab > Scroll to bottom > Input “lemmy.ml” and apply And consider donating to individual instances instead.

    • Konkyer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Why anyone would trust anything you say I’ve no idea. Your posts are all very much made up narratives.

      • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, why trust them? Trust the public modlogs that they linked instead!

        Or, ya know, keep ignoring what’s right in front of you, put your fingers in your ears and screech like a child. You seem good at that.

      • cm0002@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Each and every post includes:

        • As much screenshots as possible to capture the full context (Tankies do love to complain that critics never have the full context after all)

        • Links to the modlog and source post wherever possible

        Titles are just a summary or interpretation, as is every article you’ve ever read. The full evidence is available for you to post your own interpretation if you feel mine is wrong.

  • 87Six@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The Soviets raped and killed everything in sight when they entered Romania. They can go to hell with their “help”. They fought the nazis, and they took advantage of the rest of us.

    Nevermind how they installed a communist regime that ruined romania for like a decade or whatever. Not that communism is bad but that one sure was.

    • whiskers165@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t think you speak for all Romanians

      Majority of Romanians view Ceaușescu and communist era positively, study shows

      Romania’s president has expressed concern after a new survey highlighted a growing sense of nostalgia for the communist era, with former totalitarian leader Nicolae Ceaușescu viewed positively by most Romanians.

      The study, released this week, revealed that nearly 56% of Romanians believe the communist regime—widely regarded as one of the harshest of its era—brought more benefits than drawbacks to Romania.

      A large majority of respondents—over 66%—told researchers they now regard former dictator Nicolae Ceaușescu, who ruled the country with an iron fist from 1965 to 1989, as a good leader.

      The Institute for Public Opinion Polling (INSCOP) study, conducted with the Institute for the Investigation of Communist Crimes and the Memory of the Romanian Exile (IICCMER), suggests that nostalgia for the past is tied to widespread disenchantment around the country’s current prospects.

      Just over 27% of respondents said they believed things in Romania are heading in a good direction, with more than 63% feeling that the country is on the wrong track.

      Groups most likely to share positive sentiments about the communist era included the over-60s, people on lower incomes, and those living in the countryside or small towns. The same groups expressed the greatest disillusionment with present-day Romania.

      In total, over 48% of Romanians said they believed life was better under communism.

      https://tvpworld.com/87994994/majority-of-romanians-nostalgic-for-communism-study-shows

      • 87Six@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The majority’s opinion doesn’t mean shit. Do I need to remind everyone that America voted an old geezer pedophile billionaire bastard for president?

        No, I don’t speak for all Romanians. I’m glad I don’t.

        Ceausescu was an installed leader that had only Russia’s interests in mind, which wanted everything the leaders from other countries had, like Russia, North Korea, and other such countries. He wanted massive parrades, massive buildings, massive ego-boosting bullshit.

        He then made all lthat happen. In the process, indebted the country MASSIVELY. It took us decades to recover, and the Romanian worker paid for it, not him and his cronies. In the end he was executed by the revolution on Christmas for his acts of treason against his working class. Those people that stood up to him were heroes.

        Those that praise Ceausescu often say that he got rid of our debts. BUT HE CREATED THOSE DEBTS, with his ego-spending and megalomany

        Those that like Ceausescu are idiots. They are the same people that like George Simion and Calin Georgescu.

    • radio_free_asgarthr@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      No, that is Nazi propaganda that the US continued propagating through the cold war since it made the Soviets look bad. While there were definitely rapes that occurred, that happens with every occupying army, there was never any evidence of this being a policy or something tolerated by the officers. Any attempt to quantify this shows that American and British soldiers were more prolific in rapes of French women than Soviets anywhere on the Eastern Front, even though the usual refrain is just that the Soviets were better at covering it up than the US or UK. Also, most of the studies of this shows that having armed women combat fighters on the front and a more gender integrated military really cut down on the usual “boys will be boys” attitude of not addressing these things.

      The other attempt to try to demonstrate this is the huge spike of recorded abortions in East Germany after the war, but if you think for a second about how Nazi Germany and West Germany outlawed abortions, but abortions became fully legal under East Germany, there might have been another explanation.

      • 87Six@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        You’re fucking stupid. My family has first hand experience with all of that, you fucking tankie idiot.

        • NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Awee someone doesn’t know how to articulate a coherent thought so they just resort to becoming a li’l cave man, Hahaha.

      • stickly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        there was never any evidence of this being a policy or something tolerated by the officers

        …meanwhile…

        Have fun with a wench and take some trifle — Joe “War Crime” Stalin

        Begone tankie

        • NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Joseph “defeated the Nazis and beat the Americans to space” Stalin, lol

          Which one of your living presidents isn’t a war criminal?

          • stickly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            bullshit apologism for red army rape and war crimes, claims it wasn’t tolerated

            Show Stalin himself, on record, expressing approval for war crimes

            wHaT aBoUt UsssAa???

            Living proof you have to have some cognitive deficiency to subscribe to the tankie narrative. Go touch some grass or eat dirt or something, the internet is rotting your brain.

              • stickly@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Never said you were? I guess it’s probably easy for you to hallucinate persecution narratives since you spend so much time flooding your brain with garbage. Thanks for proving me right I guess

    • radio_free_asgarthr@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      No they didn’t. If a non-aggression pact allowing Nazi annexation of territory is equivalent to an alliance, then France and Britain allied with the Nazis multiple times before the Soviets. There is a reason about how the only non-aggression pact that you hear about is Molotov-Ribbentrop pact and not the Munich Agreements or the Franco-German Declaration, etc. The Molotov-Ribbentrop pact came out of the Soviets being turned down multiple times by France and Britain to forming an anti-fascist alliance.

      This is the selective remembrance of appeasement. It is ignored that that encompassed many non-aggression pacts with the Nazis and is only remembered to selectively invoke for war hawking. If we say a nation is evil, than not being on board with a war of aggression is actually evil (Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, etc.) and you are just like Chamberlain, whose only motivation was being a pussy. You can discuss the morality or effectiveness, but Molotov-Ribbentrop was to try to delay the war for preparation and that the Nazis wouldn’t be stupid enough to start a war without their own oil and steel supplies and without preventing a possibility of a two front war with France/Britain, and the Soviets were caught flat-footed because of overestimating the rationality of the Nazis. There was also the worry that France and Britain might eventually join the Nazis since they were pretty vocal about fascism being a possible necessary evil as it is the most extreme form of anti-communism, even though the attempt of appeasement was trying to sit out an eventual war between the Nazis and USSR, since Judeo-Bolshevism was a thing Nazis believed before they even took power.

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Lol please just shut up with your rewriting of history. No one is going to listen to your braindead ruzzian take on how the USSR was the good guys.

      • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Britain didn’t invade a country and split it with the Nazis lmao. They were hardly good guys (just ask the Bengalis), but they didn’t form an offensive alliance with literally Hitler.

        • radio_free_asgarthr@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          While it is not justifying it, but is that really a major distinction. The purpose of several previous non-aggression pacts was to sign off on Nazi territorial annexation (again, selectively remembered with appeasement) of saying “it is okay to take the Sudetenland” and “We wont use the Anschluss as a Causus Belli”. The reason the Soviets took the eastern part of Poland was to push the border west and that they felt that they could justify this by the fact that it was part of the Russian Empire and Soviet Russia during the revolution and that it was lost to get peace in WW1. That does not justify it, just that any talk about the Soviets, rather than France and Britain, being more compromised and accommodating to the Nazis or that the Soviets were more pro-Nazi than the West is demonstrably wrong and rewritting history for cold war reasons.

        • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s a lie that USSR-Germany made any agreement to split Poland. USSR liberated it before Germany could take control of the east.

          • radio_free_asgarthr@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            No, the USSR did agree to take Eastern Poland in Molotov-Ribbentrop, but they did wait until after the Nazis took the western part before starting their invasion. A combination of waiting to see if Poland could fight off the Nazis, meaning that they didn’t have to worry about further Nazi expansion, and after that moving the border west to provide more territory needing to be taken in an eventual war with Germany.

            • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Secret protocol agreement may have existed, or the forgery backed up by 1990s Russia cozying up to west and joining Stalin derangement syndrome unanimity.

              Still, the USSR did not encourage/applaud a nazi controlled Warsaw, and weather Germany could take entire country or not, would have been easier to buy tolerance for nazi controlled Warsaw. Requiring a defensive buffer proved prescient. “If you want a pact, accept us taking Warsaw”

              • “May have existed”?

                Molotov himself inadvertently implied their existence numerous times in his conversations with Chuev (Molotov Remembers; Molotov-Chuev interviews between 1970-1986, published 1993).

                Khrushchev acknowledged their existence in his memoirs, which nobody disputes the provenance of, and which were published in the West in the 1970s.

                The CPSU itself acknowledged their existence at the end of 1989, and published their copy of the text in their official journal.

                The literal Soviet documents, held by the General Department of the CPSU Central Committee, were located after the archives were declassified in 1992, and have since been published widely.

                No party seems to dispute the existence of the secret protocols. If you have a single credible source that does, feel free to cite them.

                • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Ok. Very likely existed. I was unaware of Kruschev/Molotov acknowledgements. Doesn’t affect modern nazi mischaracterization that pact, even with that compromise, constitutes any semblence of an alliance between the 2 powers.

          • Hemuphone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Hahahaha the history books you are reading are wild. I assume Finland also started the winter war?

        • RmDebArc_5@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Wasn’t Czechoslovakia (partially) split between the Nazis and Poland similar to how the Soviets initially split Poland with the Nazis? Not sure what Britain did in that direction, but this what I have heard from someone living/formerly living in the Czech republic

          • YeOldGrim@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            No. While an utterly shitty PR move for the time, Poland took a 801.5 km2 piece of the highly disputed territory, which was previously in a dramatic tug war between both countries, to a level that Czechoslovakia took it during the Polish-Soviet war.

            It shouldn’t have happened, it was an idiotic move for Poland even at the time and played right into Nazi propaganda…

            Which you are repeating now, 87 years later. Who says it’s the victors that write history…

            It was not “similar to how the Soviets initially split Poland with the Nazis”. Not even close. But UNLIKE Russia (that considers itself seemlingly the heir to the USSR), Poland history and multiple figures acknowledged that it was stupid and shameful.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    This isn’t the first time that’s happened on Lemmy. What’s up with that?

    It was lemmy.ml/worldnews…

    https://lemmy.world/modlog?page=1&actionType=All&userId=24410054

    If you go to settings you should be able to block an entire instance and then won’t see them on /all

    There’s a couple instances that always moderate like that. But you’re better off just hanging out, finding out for yourself, and then blocking what you don’t agree with.

    But there’s another that bans people for downvoting AI, but only for a few days so people come back to be trolled. And at least one that bans anyone who tries to take anything seriously.

    Stop looking at Lemmy as a single thing, there are dozens of instances acting largely autonomously and if one fucks up, make sure you call out that one and not the entire fediverse.

    • JustPlainDave@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      If you go to settings you should be able to block an entire instance and then won’t see them on /all

      Thanks

      Stop looking at Lemmy as a single thing, there are dozens of instances acting largely autonomously and if one fucks up, make sure you call out that one and not the entire fediverse.

      Fair enough. The way Lemmy works is kinda confusing.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        You know how multiplayer games can have different servers with different rules and people? Same thing.

  • Schwim Dandy@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Sometimes a user’s views don’t align with the echo chamber they are posting in. When that happens in a political community, it usually ends in removal to protect said echo chamber.

    I never see anyone get called a Nazi in cat picture communities.

      • Pinto, the Bean@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Surely you can disagree and say Russia is bad for invading places. Surely that’s not going to be removed, right?

        Or say Stalin wasn’t perfect. Surely the modlog on .ml doesn’t have thousands of those comments removed.

      • Hemuphone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        So your insgance is not an echo chamber and this one is? Based on…?

        Oh, is it because you get downvotend and shit talked here? Do note the lack of removed comments and bans.

    • JustPlainDave@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Sometimes a user’s views don’t align with the echo chamber they are posting in. When that happens in a political community, it usually ends in removal to protect said echo chamber.

      So just like reddit? That’s disappointing.

      I never see anyone get called a Nazi in cat picture communities

      Fair enough. I just thought it was weird to get called a Nazi for disagreeing that the USSR didn’t singlehandedly defeat the Nazis.

      • Lauchmelder@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        So just like reddit? That’s disappointing.

        Remember this is just Reddit for people who think they are better than redditors

          • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            i did a test, after 1+year of shadowbanned, a new account dint get banned, i avoid the major subreddits though. im guessing reddit gauges ban based on severity like ban evasion attempts, bots/spammers i think will have a difficult time making accounts(unless they are paying for mehtods to evading).

            different IP+ device still work. but i am only there sparingly, asking niche subs that arnt on reddit.

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s people using a discussion platform to talk like people do. That’s been going on much longer than Reddit. And they always think they’re better than the other ones. Again, people being people.

        • Pratai@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          If you check the mod logs, it’s not even the mods that run their own instances. It’s mostly the admins.

          Fitting in an authoritarian shithole, isn’t it?

          • Chaunticleer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Those two are specifically emmirants from .ml. Ones with a colorful history in the modlog, though you’d have to use their .ml handle

    • AskewLord@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      i got site banned from reddit for posting a picture of my cat on my porch.

      by the ‘cats can’t ever be outside’ people reporting my post as violence.

      there are extremist nutcases in every community. the problem is they are hypocritical bad faith actors, almost always. who feel anyone that represents anything they dislike means they should have free reign to abuse and harass those people.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Modern nazi revisionism is that the 1939 Germany-USSR pact means they were BFFs. It appears you would have repeated the nonsense. Generally, that nonsense is encouraged on this server, but not .ml . It’s not clear which worldnews banned you.

    if .ml, you would not have been banned for headline. But perhaps you included common cluelessness you would be unaware of.

  • BonesawIsReady@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yeah like others have said they don’t like people saying bad things about China or Russia. I’m banned from a few places for saying jack ma (founder of ali-baba) was disappeared for re-education since he used to be a huge critic of the Chinese government, went missing for like a week, then came back and suddenly started praising the Chinese government and thats not even a little sus?

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Oh gosh, any snarky comments about the reality of China and the fact that they are pumping out more billionaires than the US always get deleted on ML.

    They are fucking delusional and ignore all evidence that challenges their bizarre viewpoints. When it comes to Russia they are even worse. They are not wrong about Russia doing the heavy lifting in WWII, but they are definitely being assholes about it.

    Whenever I am on Lemmy and noticed someone being very passive aggressive around politics you can almost guarantee they are from ML.

    • late_pessimistic@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Whenever I am on Lemmy and noticed someone being very passive aggressive around politics you can almost guarantee they are from ML.

      I have also noticed this a few weeks ago. I don’t know whats with the snarky, ignorant, immature attitude, but its always .ml

    • innermachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I have found that if u make a legitimate argument backed by facts that are irrefutable, the mod will ban you and delete all your comments for breaking from their echo chamber. Decided to return the favor for their whole instance so I no longer have the misfortune of seeing any of the drivel on their communities. Sucks because there was a couple I enjoyed despite the tankies, but there’s much better alternative communities on other instances that won’t kick u out for having a differing opinion. .ml/hexbear basically = authoritarian cuck, it’s like the communist version of Trump supporters as weird as that sounds.

  • Janx@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    My time on Lemmy drastically improved when I blocked the “Tankie Triad”, which is Lemmygrad.ml, Hexbear.net, and Lemmy.ml. I also unsubscribed from anything .ml and manually searched for the next most-popular non-tankie community.

    I don’t care if you have different beliefs than me, but tankies are unreasonable, trolling, and biased, in both content and moderation. They’re not around to discuss anything in good faith…

    • trainsrkool@lemmy.mlBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      gots to block those evil communists! can’t have anything not approved by the empire getting into my liberal echo chamber!! 🥀

      • Hemuphone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I mean - its literally the paradox of tolerance. Tankie instances wont let you speak freely. Tankies are free to spam their shit here though. Notice how you have not been banned yet?

        So basically you don’t lose much by blocking the tankie triad. It just means you can discuss without randomly being blocked/banned. There are most definitely other instances/commukities that ban people for bad reasons, and I would promote blocking them too. Fuck the power tripping mods/admins.

    • abc@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, those places should be covered by the FAQ or something.

      A much better solution would be for every other instance to just defederate them.

        • abc@suppo.fi
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          That is indeed a good idea, but doesn’t fix the problem for the new people coming to Lemmy via popular instances like lemmy.world.

      • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Unfortunately most places can’t just defederate from .ml.

        They’re the developers of lemmy. For instance owners to keep on top of updates and shit they need to be federated. World already did defederatebteom lemmygrad and hexbear.

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s not true. Even if it was the Soviets there were millions of human hands involved

  • Godric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    .ml comm? It’s pretty funny how they can’t even run an online community without censorship.

  • bedwyr@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    World news is modded by zionists, or is this a different world news? Lemmy has like a lot with similar names. It’s a thing on here too, although less so. Especially on world news with zionists.