• 52fighters@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    If, over the next 10 years, your country became more and more like China, would you go along with the changes? Would you have any problems with the transformation?

    • culprit@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago
      • modern electricity grid quickly moving away from fossil fuels
      • high speed train network
      • cheap fresh produce
      • affordable housing
      • transitioning to socialism via the development of productive forces
      • strong investment in education and R&D
      • quickly advancing tech in almost every sector that matters
      • people-directed governance that is not subservient to capital (foreign or domestic)
      • very low crime
      • ecological restoration that won’t get cancelled by the next elected administration
      • cheap and good quality healthcare
      • bold long term vision and consistent achievement of it over time

      objectively better than just about any other place

  • Westerners today have so much in common with their inquisition and crusades predecessors. They replaced Christianity with Western Liberalism and they fight for it with the same zeal. Either you adopt their values and systems or you are an evil heathen who must be destroyed.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Its like comparing the Federation and the Empire from elite dangerous lol.

    Empire elitists always talking about how bad the Federation is because of the insane capitalist abuse of power, and billions of humans subjected to horrific conditions.

    And then Federation liberals talking about how the Empire literally has legalized slavery and a monarchy that runs on the death of humans.

    Although technically there’s also the stereotypical Asian CEO who has a 15% discount on all ships and modules in his systems, so I guess that’s probably the successor to Ali Express lol.

    That all being said, the post above this is an article trying to explain how China plating 78 billion trees was a bad idea lmao.

  • Dippy@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 hours ago

    If you can find me a governance representing more than 100 million people that is genuinely good, with no ifs ands or buts about it, I can prove that you are the brainwashed one.

      • architect@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Hmm, must be an llm, they never said the word perfect. They never said anything had to be perfect.

        How does that feel?

        • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Well kind of funny because it’s not at all comparable to what you’re trying to compare it to. Also I never called anyone an llm I asked if they used it as it left an artefact.

      • Dippy@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I need it to stop doing evil things first. I am all for reducing the evil, less evil is always great and ill always vote for a lesser evil. But dont expect me to a government structure good if it is still doing evil things. Ill call a politician good if they want to decrease the evil. But I will not call a country good if its still evil.

    • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 hours ago

      “China is actually not hell on earth”

      “You’re just brainwashed, everyone there is actually dead”

      Removed by mod

      • architect@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I’m not sure your point. What’s removed in your example? It’s clear that normal comments are being removed as our China government official in the thread has nicely quoted removed comments proving nothing bad was said at all.

        • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 hours ago

          China government official in the thread

          He is not affiliated with the CPC, but thank you for demonstrating how quickly “good” liberals devolve into conspiratorial racism as soon as their sense of nationalist superiority is shaken.

  • calmblue75@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 hours ago

    My god the comments. You are perfectly allowed to not know much about a country. I don’t know about PRC either. But I know to keep my mouth shut on matters I don’t know about. I don’t go on parroting propaganda for those things.

    • Einskjaldi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s all about geography , if China was on the map like Australia or more like the US they wouldn’t have any problems if they had plenty of space and no neighbors.

  • Mister Neon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I’m an American. China might not be bad, but they ain’t going to be good to me. America isn’t good to me either.

    • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 hours ago

      You’d be surprised, the worst thing that could happen to you while traveling to really any global south country is getting scammed (overcharging for a meal or taxi) and that’s about it. Most people are very welcoming and will be friendly even excited to see a foreigner. It’s pretty much just Europe and North america where people treat you rude or at best just indiffirently if they see you’re a tourist.

      Streamers ludwig and some other recently filmed a trip throughout mainland China and it’s pure good vibes.

      • architect@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        You need to watch foreigners stream in America. They have the same lovely experiences (and with the worst people to boot). This idea you’ll get treated badly in the usa as a tourist is a lie.

  • FreeBeard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 hours ago

    This comment section is filthy! And all of that just to justify the chinese imperialistic ambitions. Looks really twisted to me.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I appreciate the term “imperialistic ambitions,” because it acknowledges that China hasn’t actually done stuff that you could plausibly call imperialist, so all you can do is criticize stuff that they might possibly want to do someday.

  • null@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 hours ago

    China can have products that are great and cheap. China can also have stolen designs and inhumane labor practices. They’re not mutually exclusive.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The working classes use state authority for pro-social policy and to prebent capitalists from gaining political power, as opposed to capitalist authority for pro-profit policy and to prevent the working classes from gaining political power. Authority has a class dynamic, analysis without class erases the core distinction.

    • Internetexplorer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Lol America, land of the free, they literally arrested anyone who said they were a communist and confiscated your gold because they said it was illegal.

      Yet China is frowned upon.

    • iByteABit@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Aah yes unlike never authoritarian capitalist governments that totally don’t break in your house to throw you in the cold bitter streets to die because you couldn’t afford rent and made the property “unprofitable”. The West has no right lecturing anyone over human rights and liberty, they could just discard them from their dictionary if only it didn’t serve as great propaganda against their class enemies.

        • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 hours ago

          That’s because a state is itself an instrument of class warfare first and foremost. In some places the rich wield the state against the people, and in other places the people wield the state against the rich.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Define authoritarian. The PRC spent decades of anti-colonial struggle defeating British imperialists, Japanese imperialists, feudal reactionaries, and then US imperialists. Do you know more than them about how to defeat vicious empires, “non-authoritarianly”?

      • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 hours ago

        they should’ve just prayed and cattered to the imperialists like India.

        As malcolm x once said “The West doesn’t not have any love for China but it respects it, while they love India but they do not respect it.”

        These very same jerks would love China if it was just another uwu Japan/SKorea hosting US troops.

    • square@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 hours ago

      They’re not even against capitalism. They only pay lip service to anti-capitalism.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 hours ago

              The communist party is a working class party. What exactly do you think the purpose of a party is? And what do you think class is? You seem confused on each.

            • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 hours ago

              No just one out of every 14 people, which you may notice is many thousands of times more democratic than any of the western so-called democracies by percentage.

              • GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 hours ago

                So 13 out of 14 people do not belong to the only political coalition (the 8 parties with 700,000 members total don’t really count as “opposition parties”) that is legally allowed in their country?

                In reference to my original post, we agree that authoritarianism is bad and you are arguing the case that China and the CCP is not authoritarian, correct?

                • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  They seem to be doing a pretty good job

                  we agree that authoritarianism is bad

                  No. We disagree that “authoritarianism” is a meaningful distinction when every government exists by authority. Might as well call it “badguyism”

          • GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            23 hours ago

            A state the exists as a servant to a citizenry that is not limited to class or ethnicity. A state served as a safeguard to the human rights of all humans within its sovereignty.

            It also serves as a mechanism to efficiently direct resources to human advancement as basic needs are automated.

            • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              22 hours ago

              You just described the PRC, and notably not capitalist dictatorships, whose governments don’t represent their people / working class, but the interests of capitalists only.

              You desperately need to get past this poli-sci-intro-level understanding of what states are. States are organizations of force for one class (meaning in Marxism their relationship to production) to oppress another. The USA and other liberal countries are capitalist dictatorship over workers, while the PRC is a worker’s dictatorship over capital.

              Here are some resources:

            • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              23 hours ago

              I meant like can you give an example of one

              Also:

              It also serves as a mechanism to efficiently direct resources to human advancement as basic needs are automated.

              So like China

                • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  21 hours ago

                  Jesus, at this point why don’t you just admit that by “non-authoritarian” you just mean “white”.

                • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  23 hours ago

                  Finland? Where despite years of protest by the people, the state continues to buy Israeli weapons and cooperate with the zionist entity in the development of military tech and spyware? The state currently ignoring the wishes of it’s people in order to aid and abet a historically unpopular genocide?

                • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  23 hours ago

                  The country that was a Nazi ally and didn’t drop the swastika from their air force insignia until 2025? Finland the country currently implementing mass austerity while giving tax cuts to the rich? That Finland?

    • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 hours ago

      authoritarians

      Thought terminating cliche used by the unintelligent and uninformed to avoid reckoning with reality beyond vibes.

        • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Every country should be blocking the US surveillance giants, its extremely naive for countries to be letting facebook, twitter, reddit, and google operate unhindered.

          There’ no such thing as a “non-authoritarian” state or other myths like the tooth-fairy, but even if they existed, then it’d be hard to argue that letting the US surveillance state operate freely within your borders is somehow “non-authoritarian”. The US is more likely than any other country to use the intelligence they’ve gained learned to harm you physically.

        • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Literally every government with the capability to control information is doing that, and frankly the rise of bleach-injecting covid denialist flat earth tradwife inflluencers has proven China right to do so.

          • GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            23 hours ago

            From Merriam-Webster

            " of authoritarian

            1 relating to, or favoring blind submission to [authority].

            2 relating to, or favoring a concentration of power in a leader or an elite not constitutionally responsible to the people

            • Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              20 hours ago

              i love that it has the caveat in the second definition abt a constitution. like, no guys, totslly not us, look at this definition we created to show how we arent authoritarian

            • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              23 hours ago

              So like, objectively not China? Because their ruling party consists of 90 million members and they’re constantly debating shit, and enjoy an incredibly high satisfaction rate among non-party members?

        • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 hours ago

          You clearly don’t understand the purpose of the firewall and the online surveillance is no more than any other country but at least our government is accountable to us as opposed to owned by capital.

          • khannie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 hours ago

            the online surveillance is no more than any other country

            Hahahaha. Spoken like someone who has never been there or lives in pure ignorance. You just try to use an encrypted chat app while there and see what happens. Or criticise the government.

            Oh, you can’t. That VPN…that’ll fix it though. Oh that’s right, they’re illegal.

            Just like everywhere else. Hahaha.

            • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 hours ago

              I was born and raised here. The VPN is for the firewall which has many reasons to exist and I support, also they’re not illegal. Criticising the government is super common but mostly over mundane stuff because that’s what people care about (there’s a reason the approval even according to Harvard is 95+%). You people are always so arrogant while being so uninformed it’s amazing.

              • khannie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Making a statement that online surveillance there is no different from elsewhere will get you that kind of response tbh. It is measurably worse.

                • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  It simply isn’t. Remember snowden? The NSA? TAO? Pegasus? Our government is simply more open and honest with us (might be a side effect of having real democracy as opposed to a charade put on by bought candidates every 4 years). Also before you say that’s just America, Europe are American vassal states all of these and more (since this is just what has leaked) are deployed against Europeans too and intel is shared in deals like five eyes.

            • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 hours ago

              You are literally talking to a Chinese person from China, smug liberal dipshittery knows no bounds

              • khannie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Then they fit the second part, living in ignorance. Online surveillance there is measurably worse.

                • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  The firewall was created to foster and protect China’s fledgling digital infrastructure and data sovereignty. Many countries regulate foreign platforms and data flows. China built its own ecosystem instead of depending on foreign companies. We have seen what happens when foreign platforms operate without local oversight: Facebook facilitating genocide in Myanmar, coordinated anti-vax disinformation campaigns in Southeast Asia, algorithm-driven radicalization. The firewall makes those kinds of external influence operations harder or close to impossible to run at scale. I support it and so do many others as the alternative is plain to see. Also everyone has a VPN we’re not living in ignorance it is in fact people like yourself who are massively ignorant about us and our country.

            • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              23 hours ago

              To us. There’s a reason that even from Harvard’s research the government has a 95+% approval.

              Direct elections reach the township and county levels where voters choose deputies to local people’s congresses. These grassroots deputies constitute the overwhelming majority of all deputies nationwide. Advancement to higher levels requires proven service at lower rungs, ensuring every national deputy has worked up from local material conditions and remains accountable to the masses below.

              Grassroots legislative liaison stations and community consultation channels ensure mass input shapes policy at every stage, making democracy a daily practice not a periodic (meaningless) ritual. Whole-process people’s democracy embeds consultation and pilot programs into governance: policies are tested locally, refined through mass feedback, then scaled nationally. This grounds decisions in what we want and need.

              All 55 ethnic minorities hold guaranteed representation in the NPC. Farmers and labourers comprise roughly 15% of deputies while professionals and technical personnel make up the remainder.

              Even besides all that if you just look at what the Chinese government does as opposed to those owned by capital. Mass poverty alleviation, anticorruption at all levels, massive investment in socially profitable but monetarily unprofitable public services, deflating the housing bubble. These are not the actions of a government only looking out for a select few.

              And also the CPC has over 100million members since 2024 that 1 in 14 people are party members not to mind those who aren’t but are active in consulting due to their position such as most engineers and scientists.

              • GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 hours ago

                You should be skeptical of any poll or survey that presents that level of agreement on anything with that breadth of societal implications.

                How do you square the whole Hong Kong protests in regards to the extradition laws? Or the aggression towards Taiwan?

                • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  Just because the anglosphere is a socioeconomic nightmare realm of genocide, immiseration and omnipresent propaganda where everyone is at each other’s throats doesn’t mean everywhere else is too.

                  What you’re saying is you want to be suspicious of data that paints other places in a better light than us, because it makes you feel bad. You then rationalize this desire as “wisdom” while continuing to apply it selectively against societies your government has told you to hate.

  • AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    All states are bad, but if we’re talking about which ones are arguably better or worse on the world stage…

    “USA USA USA, WE’RE NUMBER 1!”

    Proudly colonizing for 250 years?

    • architect@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Seems to be what people do. America isn’t the first or the only one. People are shit is that your argument?

      • MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 hours ago

        That’s actually a statistical error.

        Most people are alright. Power-hungry individuals responsible for colonialism are outliers and should not have been counted (or allowed to reach/stay in positions of power)

      • m532@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        “All people are colonizers. Those who aren’t colonizing aren’t people” - colonizer brain in action.

    • for_some_delta@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Power for things like colonizing is the best indicator of a successful state. End state power. I like that the original was intended as a slight against anarchists. States keep projecting that vertical energy.

    • orc girly@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Most people here were taught the same bs about China and we broke away from that by sitting down, reading and looking at the (lack of) evidence for everything they’re accused of. China isn’t perfect, none of us claim it is, it also isn’t at all what state department propaganda claims

    • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      You actually are experiencing the propaganda being turned down, it’s just that a fish doesn’t notice the water until it’s gone. The anti-China orthodoxy that is the default in western ruling class political thought is the astroturfed position, not the other way around.