• DeadMartyr@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Tbf we should always aim for slight inflation. You want to incentivize people to use their money on things so it circulates, and it being slightly depreciating is the best way to do that.

      If it was the best option long term to just stuff money into a mattress and sit on it for a decade then that has it’s own problems

      • DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        The best inflation is zero. The second best is slight inflation. The third best is slight deflation. Because they can’t control it that well they aim for slight inflation so it doesn’t go negative.

    • Lantsu@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      Just a polite reminder that if you only need to print a few papers, it’s probably cheaper/easier/free to use the printer at local library! Mine does it for like 15 cents a paper, or for free if you have your own paper! Much less hassle than buying a good printer, sorting the ink situation and then fighting with that machine…

    • JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Are people still out there buying new ink cartridges every time they need to print something? I was sick of that s*** in 2019 and returned my printer to Costco and I’m never buying another printer again.

        • JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          You just bought it? Well I’ve got news for you. It’s going to start nagging you about ink cartridges in a couple months. Yes even laser printers do this. I thought just like you when I bought a laser printer that I had escaped the ink cartridge nightmare. Nope.

          • RiderExMachina@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            “Your laser printer, which doesn’t use ink, will nag you about buying ink” is a wild sentence.

            You must use Windows and bought an HP laser jet, cause I don’t have that problem. Linux + that Brother laser printer everyone has = tech that isn’t garbage.

    • ∃∀λ@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      What should just be a little plastic box containing ink has a tiny computer inside to prove to the printer it’s not counterfeit. All so that the manufacture can have their give-the-razor-for-free-sell-the-blades business model, enforced by the anti-circumvention part of copyright law.

  • Stormcrow@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    •Buying home •Private insurance •New cars •Haircuts •Eating at expensive restaurant •Fast food •Subscriptions instead of owning •Brands •Cotton-swab not for ear •Jiffylube •Carbon emissions from consumer vehicles •Tariffs •Freetrade agreements •Food deliver services

  • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    Cordless power tools. Yes, they are useful in concept, but today they’re just a loss-leader to sell you overpriced batteries.

    • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      I wouldn’t call that a scam. (Modern) Cordless power tools are fucking incredible despite the branded batteries being a rip-off. I literally have corded tools that I don’t even use because extension cords are a real pain in the ass some times.

      • Nomorereddit@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        We are all one family under the sun, it just happens that people are born different.

        Its why we like step sibling porn so much.

        Because what tastes better than mom’s home cooking?

      • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        As the other commenter shared, in Germany they’re working on an interchangeable battery system. In the U.S., the manufacturers sell intro bundles cheaply to get us locked into their “ecosystem.” That’s the scam part. I’ve got a drill and impact driver set that i paid less for than the replacement cost of the included batteries. It’s the same scheme as inkjet printers.

        • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          Right I won’t deny the branded batteries are overpriced but that has nothing to do with the cordless power tools themselves, and with regard to Germany, I’m not sure what there really is to “work on” considering every pack is already the same 20V pack of 18650s with a few wires, a universal battery management system, and copper electrical contacts. “We’re working on it” is just an excuse to continue this practice while pretending like “we hear your concerns.”

        • DornerStan@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          The batteries should 100% be universal and interchangeable (to whatever degree is practical). The whole ecosystem nonsense can get fucked.

          But as a form factor cordless is inherently superior for a lot of tools. I’m not gonna haul an extension cord onto a roof or whatnot.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      I hate how the batteries are always incompatible with every other tool except (sometimes) the ones by the same manufacturer. Its tempting to get a petrol generator instead and just use corded tools.

      • SoGrumpy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Here in Germany at least, the OEMs are working together battery wise. The battery from X fits in Y and Z, whilst the battery from Y fits in X and Z.

        • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          Now picturing a McGregor to Parkside to Ryobi to Bosch to …

          Massive stack of battery converters that ends up looping back round. Now you can take any tool and any battery and just split the stack where necessary. Of course if you want to go Parkside to McGregor you are going to have to have every single adapter in the stack.

    • stoicEuropean@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Came here for that answer. Large concentrations of wealth generate structural power that can distort political decisions and markets in a way that serves to perpetuate itself. This creates a virtuous circle in which capital shapes return conditions / regulation / access advantages in such a way as to systematically favour further capital growth.

  • Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Passive income. If value is being created and you’re being presented some of it without doing any work it necessarily means that someone else isn’t receiving the full value of the work they’re doing.

      • amorangi@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Why should you be paid in perpetuity for work you did once? I’d love it if someone paid me residules for the work I did today making widgets.

        • spongebue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          But how should a singer who produces an album, or an author who writes a book, or whatever be compensated? Its popularity isn’t really known until after it’s published, it’s not really fair for a damn good writer to get paid the same as someone who produces slop.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        Cap it at the original 28 years after creation. The current 70 years after the creator’s death is ridiculous.

        • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          Even 15 years is a lot of money for something you most likely spent under 6 months creating. Of course, we could always have a detailed system and not just one flat time frame.

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            23 days ago

            I think people overestimate how much the average creator can get from their work over time. They need to keep creating to maintain a livable income. Also, 28 years is a good number because it prevents mega corporations from stealing from small creators. Imagine if some novel series becomes a big hit, but Disney or Warner Brothers could just adapt it whenever they pleased without paying the author.

        • HeHoXa@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          No no no. I gave them CULTURE! A wonderful work culture.

          And security! Sure, not the security I decided I need for myself, and it’s only really present as long as they’re profitable to me, but security nonetheless.

          After all, I had the idea and stuck my neck out to secure the financing, which is far more important than the actual daily labor that keeps things running.

          We’re like a family, see.

        • kunaltyagi@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          Even if the assets aren’t people, not squeezing value is required to maintain some fun and life as well as long term sustainability. If you squeeze it, you might squeeze it dry. I hate all the adverts everywhere. Can I just go somewhere to save my eyes…

    • Basement_Dweller@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      haha I’m actually a student, our professor wants us to ask questions and study stuff about lemmy and I just chose a random popular question from reddit

    • NannerBanner@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Ugh, I didn’t even think to check, but that’s a pretty bare history. I’ve noticed some shitty questions lately, like the generic reddit drivel the other day about ‘what do you miss about pre-internet?’