• [object Object]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    ·
    5 个月前

    “$700 million in interest is added to the final bill every month that the government delays tariff refunds, or around $23 million per day.”

    It’s insane that the American tax payers paid more for products, and now they get to pay interest on their illegal payments, and all of that money goes into the coffers of private companies — who will no doubt use it to issue special dividends to their investors and bonuses to their execs.

    Any sane administration would be promptly removed and this would be a chain around their neck for a generation.

    • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      5 个月前

      Alright, well the only way they are getting promptly removed is if average Americans all decide they need to go to DC to physically do it.

        • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 个月前

          If only the ‘opposition’ party wasn’t spineless. Y’know how the j6ers did their coup? Republicans paid for it.

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.worldBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 个月前

          i can’t remember what the election map of DC looks like. oh right 95% blue. no wonder that’s the first place krasnov’s grosstapo went

  • ekZepp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    5 个月前

    Stick to your old hardware and wait for the shitstorm to pass. The big tech deserve to fail.

    • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      5 个月前

      The big tech doesn’t deserve to fail. a bail out, but will definitely be getting one.

      • Kn1ghtDigital@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        66
        ·
        5 个月前

        Hot take: if your company needs a bailout it’s no longer a private company and belongs to people as a public service and is regulated as such.

        • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          ·
          5 个月前

          I mean… personally? I don’t feel like this is actually that much of a hot take. More of a verifiably good idea.

            • zikzak025@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              5 个月前

              And yet the “free” market can’t be trusted to correct itself and fill the gaps if we allow a giant megacorp to fall.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              5 个月前

              “Pay no attention to the [US government buying 10% of Intel] behind the curtain.”

          • kiterios@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 个月前

            The bailout is the government purchasing shares at about to go bankrupt prices. It’s a reasonable take that isn’t even really a change in the system.

            • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 个月前

              See…that’s the kind of logic that gets people places!

              … unfortunately in the US the place it might get you is the gulag…

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.worldBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 个月前

          bailouts ought to come with leverage either as a loan/bond (at fed rates) or a capital investment. I agree! and then the company can either buy the government out or repay the loan. it strikes me as fair.

          now hear me out: that fund that the government owns? all those stocks and bonds?

          if you are an elected official, you gotta sell your stocks, your bonds, your etfs, everything. then you invest in the government fund. they’re gonna fuck around to boost those stocks anyways, so let’s have a set that we know.

          then make an ETF for us plebes that follows it that we can invest in if we want to follow their inside trading.

  • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    5 个月前

    The tech industry will get to keep refunds of the of tariffs they’ve collected AND will make more money automating the distribution of those refunds to themselves.

    Sounds like the tech industry is in tariff heaven.

  • deliriousdreams@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 个月前

    I have a question. The government is repaying companies that paid the tariffs. But the companies passed the cost of the tariffs on to the consumers. Do the consumers get refunded for their tariff applicable purchases? Like. Not the whole thing obvious, but the portion that covered the tariffs?

    • moonshadow@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 个月前

      What do you think lol? Cards Against Humanity is sending wee little checks out if you email them, but it’s both a marketing stunt and the only incidence I’ve heard of

      • deliriousdreams@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 个月前

        I think it’s important to highlight it because these companies likely will pocket the refunds and give their consumers nothing. I doubt that prices will even fall in the wake of this to pre tariff prices.

        Which means even in fucking it up and enacting tariffs that were illegal it still benefitted businesses instead of consumers when what that idiot claimed at the start is that the American people would benefit and even see lower prices.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 个月前

    “Restraint’s probably not the perfect word,” but the president may start exhibiting “a little more contemplation and thoughtfulness,” Dolen suggested.

    I mean, theoretically, yes…

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 个月前

    The content of the article does not match the title. It doesn’t actually talk specifically about the tech industry or claim that it is in particular difficulty.