• MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    If I can have a sausage sizzle as I’m protesting, I would go out more often.

    StoryTime

    I once got called out to protest for ‘personal freedoms’. They didn’t explain much further. I get there and its full on anti vaxx. They want their freedom to work without a vaccine. Wish I had the balls to walk away, but I stood there for an hour or 2. (Oh yeah. I’m in Australia, but the guy who invited me posted sympathy for Charlie Kirk. So I’m glad we not talking anymore)

    Will never forget that fireman, who probably come back from saving someone’s life (or at least, coming back from saving someone’s property) giving a thumbs down to the protest.

    100%, it wasn’t at me directaly, but now 4-5 years on, I still remember him.

    can I do a story time WITHIN a story time?

    Whenever Violet08 posts, there will be a tonne of comments along the lines of “oh. This account again”.am I recognised here too? I always post a lot after a few drinks, so maybe 1-2 people will recognise a spam post, look up and see ‘oh. Midsized is drinking again’

    :::

    • Owl@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      am I recognised here too?

      You don’t ask NSFW questions while posing as an 18yo girl, a bit less memorable

      But now you are tagged and I shall remember you

    • i_love_FFT@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      We have a whole Quebec political party that’s about not voting for federal elections… Want to protest against the libs or the cons? Vote for the Block!

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        As an Ontarian I appreciate the BQ. All I’m saying is Quebecois don’t burn nearly as much shit as the French. And the rets of us aren’t doing anything. Having a less capital-compliant part of Canada would be good for all of us.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Whenever the French are protesting something they all seem to end up setting their own cars on fire.

    “I’m unhappy about the retirement age being raised by one year, here let me set the fire to this random persons fiat, that will show the government”

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Whenever the governments of the US and Canada do anything we can’t even be fucked to do much of anything, so I think shutting the hell up and letting the French do what they do is probably better than trying to mock them for at least trying.

  • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Absolutely fantastic. Once you get over the initial chuckle at how novel a concept it is, its a god damn power play.

    An army marches on its stomach.

  • Takapapatapaka@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
    link
    fedilink
    Français
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    And yet i’ve never seen a french protest where they had decent sound system. Not that important when the goal is to make noise, but they sure got their priorities

  • tino@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    You can’t do that in USA. You don’t have the public transport infrastructure.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Middle aged American here, and when I was a kid the culture around me regarding france was basically “lol they surrender.” And that whole stupid thing probably peaked in 2003 with Freedom Fries.

    But now?

    I honestly wonder if any other nation’s population has their heads on straight as much as the French. The only place in Europe where I have spent much time though is up in Sweden, and the nords seem pretty good at life-ing too.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Historically, the French really only surrendered once, unfortunately evocative of the “but you fuck a goat one time …” joke. It didn’t help that they surrendered to one of the biggest monsters in history, at a time where they arguably didn’t need to surrender. TBF, the main reason their biggest ally (Britain) didn’t surrender at the same time was the fact that they were able to run away.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        The other thing to remember is that when they surrendered they surrendered their entire naval fleet to the Nazis which was really irksome because why did they do that? So then the British had to launch a mission to sink the French naval fleet. All of which was a giant waste of resources, those ships could have come over to the UK.

        Obviously it’s all water under the bridge now but it was a tactically stupid decision.

        • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          when they surrendered they surrendered their entire naval fleet to the Nazis

          This is absolutely not correct. The Nazis didn’t try to seize (what was left of) the French fleet until the end of 1942 (more than two years later) in response to the Anglo-American invasion of North Africa. The French fleet remained under Vichy France’s control and the French admiral had promised to scuttle the fleet if the Germans attempted to seize it. Churchill did not consider this assurance adequate for the security of his country and ordered the attack. It’s worth noting that France did scuttle most of their remaining vessels when the Germans attempted to take them in 1942.

          Should the French fleet have continued fighting? As I mentioned in my comment, the entire country could have and probably should have continued fighting. But once France surrendered, there’s no particularly logical reason why just one part of their military should have gone on.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Middle aged American here, and when I was a kid the culture around me regarding france was basically “lol they surrender.”

      Copied from my earlier comment elsewhere:

      Have an extensive history of military might, from rampaging barbarian hordes, to a continent-conquering emperor, to a foreign legion famed as being one of the most badass fighting forces in the world, and nobody bats an eye. But get embarrassingly outflanked one time, and you never hear the end of it!

      explanation since the comm isn't History Memes this time
      • “rampaging barbarian hordes” – the Gauls
      • “continent-conquering emperor” – Napoleon
      • “foreign legion” – the French Foreign Legion
      • “embarrasingly outflanked” – the failure of the Maginot Line in WWII
      • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        One post that I read somewhere else on fedi was in the lines of, you can’t reasonably think French are cowards, they made snails into fine cuisine.

    • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      It does seem they’re suffering from the same rightward-slide that many other countries are facing though, unfortunately.

    • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      They’ve been flirting with far-right government like most everyone else, but their protesting game is on point. The whole country being smaller than Texas helps, too.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah, the average population density of the US is a lot lower than many people realize. Protests are seen as city-based things, both geographically and culturally.

        And then you have eu-nation-sized red states that can hold many many trumpers who are unable to play nice with others because they don’t have to have neighbors.

        • Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          How on earth the fact that your country also has was swats of empty land stops you from doing effective protesting? Or any, actually.

          • Zink@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            I didn’t really finish my thought there. Apologies.

            It was starting to get at why we don’t really see “the americans” protested like we might “the french.” And our media doesn’t help in how they report it. It enables the republican populace as well as the entire government to more easily ignore it. It’s always "protests broke out in cities across america in response to X.

            The physical separation is also part of it. it all helps feed into this “divide” where the republican voters can seemingly give no shits about human suffering or the rise of fascism because it’s all happening to “other” people far away. It might as well be the middle east.

            People without neighbors are also less clued into to how policy changes affect entire societies of people, rather than just the price of gas for their truck.

            And like the other reply said, this is just one contributing factor.

            • kunaltyagi@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              Protesting in the bumfuck nowhere gives no results. 10 people protested in village of 200 isn’t news. 2k people protested in 200 villages isn’t news.

              • baahb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 days ago

                Disagree… It’s not “reported” as news, but if 5% of a town showed up to a protest, that’s a big fkn deal to the people who see it, and makes them aware that the protest exists.

          • nile_istic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            It’s only one factor. The bigger factor is that our police are insanely militarized. If my black ass tried to barbecue at a protest, I’d get gunned the fuck down, then I’d be unnamed in the news stories (if there were any), and the cop would get a medal for killing a “terrorist”.

            • Nalivai@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              That’s more like it. Americans (just like Russians) like to automatically dismiss all the critique and calls to action with this knee-jerk “country big” reaction, and since you can’t actually do anything with a country being big, it’s a bit of a thought terminating cliché. Meanwhile, the size of a country rarely has anything to do with anything

    • D_C@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Excuses incoming in 3, 2, 1…

      “But, but, but the us country is huge. We can’t be expected to protest about something all the way over there…”

      “But, but, but, wait for the midterms. We’ll sort it then.”

      “But, but, but, the protests are gaining steam now. It’s not easy to coordinate these things and we need time…{also we’ll conveniently ignore you when you point out that we live in a world of instant communication and that protests and strikes were coordinated decades ago when we didn’t have today’s technology}

      • [deleted]@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        “But, but, but the us country is huge. We can’t be expected to protest about something all the way over there…”

        Oh, is all of Europe protesting in unity when protests are happening in Paris? i must have missed that.

        • baahb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          I mean… What is a shitty little protest in Madrid gonna do to Brussels? You are comparing apples to oranges.

          Protesting local matters, like French people being pissed about French shit makes sense. The French understand their power structure well.

          Protesting continental matters is considerably more tricky, because of the distance involved.

            • baahb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              And you see how well the anti isreal genocide protests are going… So appreciate you making my point for me.

              Protesting in Houston does fuckall to Washington in the immediate.

        • D_C@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Not at the moment. But that’s mainly because other countries shouldn’t really be invading each other over domestic issues!

          However there was a huge ‘protest’ about 90 years ago when a useless dictator tried to overtake a massive part of the world. You really should look up history about it and see how they tackled that dictator, they didn’t have today’s technology and that ‘protest’ spanned a huge area.
          It’d be very helpful, though that does require you putting a bit of effort in…

        • NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Glad to hear - we don’t hear about it as much up in Canada lately. The news cycle is always desperate to keep up with whatever the orange buffoon is fucking up next

          • ChillPenguin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            Oh yeah. That’s true. The news really dropped off once the federal government “pulled back” ICE. But they’re still doing the same shit. Still kidnapping. We’re still documenting and doing our stuff.

      • mister_flibble@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        With regard to point 3, ‘today’s technology’ is very much a double edged sword. Yes, you can communicate instantly but surveillance has modernized just as much.

        As reductive as it sounds, I think part of the issue is it happens all the time in other countries because it happens all the time in other countries. The connections to each other already exist. The networks already exist. All the instant communication in the world doesn’t make a lick of difference if you have no idea who else to call. At this point, I feel like that’s the real benefit of protests. You gotta meet like minded people somewhere to get any real momentum and third spaces are pretty fucking dead.

        I don’t think the issue is necessarily a lack of will to organize now, I think the issue was a lack of will to do so years ago. Hell, decades ago for that matter. So now the people that genuinely do care have to build their entire network from the ground up while under heavy surveillance which yes, is going to be fucking slower.

      • Hiro8811@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        I mean in a certain sense they are a bit true, the French protested for so long that Paris has created the Rue in order to have some control over the crowds