• Jarix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Take your usb cable, wrap it around something round of the size of curl you want and hit it with hot air, being careful not to melt it.

    You will achieve the springy tangly mess in the picture. Your cable will now be 2/3 or less of the straight length

  • antiR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    That’s why I like the chinese brands because you need thick cables for their ultra fast charging tech. Although the fast charging are a bit proprietary so you have to find legitimate ones online when they do break.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    If you want the actual answer it’s because you can’t. There is very little voltage going through those cables, and there is no data line at all.

    If you wanted to recharge your phone through a cable like that it would take about 10 years.

    You can get high quality armoured recharge cables, they’re not even all that expensive, you just don’t get them in the box. Apple don’t even give you a charger these days, so is it really all that hard to believe that they would give you the cheapest version of the cable?

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Beat me to it. A lot of times, things lasted longer simply because they were less complicated. A phone cord is two wires. A USB-C cable has up to 16, and there is a lot more bandwidth being sent though them. Not to mention all the fancy handshakes that have to be performed in order for all the various standards the cable supports to actually work as intended. Besides just high speed data, you’ve got things like ethernet, HDMI/DP, Thunderbolt, etc. all going down a single cable. A phone cord only has to send analog voice. Honestly it’s a miracle to me that USB-C even works at all, let alone semi-reliably.

      • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Should a single cable really support so many standards and high data rates though? That puts a lot of limitations on what is often just a stupidly overengineered charging cable.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Berylium Copper, which holds its shape like a spring more than the usual annealed copper conductor, is probably not used because of berylioses or contact allergies. But, other than being a worse conductor than copper, it would probably be better cool as a coil.

  • nullspace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    The only time I’ve had a frayed USB cable was from when I’d be rotting in bed on my phone with it plugged in. Cutting that down solved that problem. These days it feels like it’s the connector itself that needs to be meticulously cleaned and cared for because they only work for a few hundred cycles.

  • miadidi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I use these on all my cables both ends. This cable is 5 years old and still strong. Costed me 1 rupee per piece. Got a pack of 100 for 100rs (~1 us dollar)

  • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I have Sennheiser HD 280 headphones. They have a telephone cord for a wire. So good. So worth it. Cable still going strong after 6 years. And get this… when it breaks? I can replace it. They make spare parts. Saved me a ton of money in the long run

  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    FYI:

    Greenpeace pressured apple to stop using PVC in their plastics around 2007

    Apple realised they could gain PR while making more money by having customers needing to rebuy new cables.

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Supposedly greenpeace calls it “the poison plastic” and “the most enviromentally damaging plastic”

        Gonna have to ask them for their scientific sources.

        Personally i think plastics are fine if the product is actually durable. I take good care of my things. My 15 year old ipad mini is practically mint and if it wasnt for “making it more enviromental” i would still be using its original cable also.

        • AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Personally i think plastics are fine if the product is actually durable

          My problem is this just kicks the can down the road. Some day, no matter what, that plastic is becoming waste. Maybe it gets recycled, but most likely, it doesn’t. If it doesn’t need to be plastic, it should not be plastic. Questioning if it’ll last long enough is just asking if it can last long enough to be someone else’s problem.

          • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            Definitely a good point if if doesn’t actually need to be plastic, i highly prefer natural materials overall. But thats not always practical.

            I dont get the “someone elses problem” though. If the item is still perfectly usable then why would the next owner not also just want to use it? I personally value a hand me down that “served” my family for ages over “new thing”

            If it is broken then it can get a new life by getting recycled.

            Under current consumerism the pattern is that shit breaks and you buy it new, which causes us to psychologicly devalue the item (and thus materials) as it ages, i believe this is why so many plastics end up non recycled.

            If items where durable, reliable, repairable. People will be more capable to perceive their value and be more concious about what happens to it after it breaks because losing it will hurt. Not quite like but somewhat similar to how we care about what happens to remains after death.

            Also things being repairable increases the awareness of the materials because your working with them.

            • AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              I dont get the “someone elses problem” though. If the item is still perfectly usable then why would the next owner not also just want to use it? I personally value a hand me down that “served” my family for ages over “new thing”

              Because eventually, inevitably, there can’t be a next owner and it becomes garbage. Then, you’re right back to contributing to plastics pollution because while you can say that

              If it is broken then it can get a new life by getting recycled

              The reality is that a huge portion of plastic doesn’t get recycled.

              If items where durable, reliable, repairable. People will be more capable to perceive their value and be more concious about what happens to it after it breaks because losing it will hurt. Not quite like but somewhat similar to how we care about what happens to remains after death.

              I think you’d need a massive cultural shift to make it plausible, not just different stuff. And while we should be recycling, I don’t think it’s the right emphasis right now because recycling is largely an attempt by the oil and plastics companies to put the onus on us for the environmental harm caused by their product. It’s an attempt to fabricate an excuse to produce things out of plastic that really don’t need to be, and we’ve fallen for it. Of course we should recycle all the plastic we use, but we still shouldn’t be using plastic anywhere we don’t have to. There’s a reason the saying is “reduce, reuse, recycle”. They’re in order of priority, and recycling is the last defense. We need to start by significantly reducing the amount of plastic we use.

        • myyass@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          This is the paradox. I still have old cables from 20+ years ago, the new stuff degrades. At least the woven/braided cables seem like they might last longer.

          • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            It’s not a paradox. There is a reason why those old cables don’t degrade, and it’s the same reason why fish are full of microscopic shredded plastic that will never go away.

            • myyass@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              I understand what you’re getting at, although I think that I maybe have had the majority of plastic removed from my body with how much blood was removed from me. Actually it wouldn’t surprise me if I was a blood bank for the ER when I was in the hospital last year.

                • myyass@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  I not sure what to think when you phrase it that way. Are you a follower of the Omnissiah? I have a good amount of metal in my organic mass.

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        And give up the opportunity to get applause for planned obedience? That is not how you capitalism.

        Its quite telling that ever since apple got forced to use usb-c the quality of their cables made a huge leap. It’s almost like the availability of competing cables is good for innovation or something.