• Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    If Democrats ever regain power, this needs to be official. “Donald Trump is a pedophile” should be by law written on all currency. It will take decades to educate Americans.

    Biden tried the quiet “let’s sweep it under the rug and everyone will forget” approach. It didn’t work.

    Trump is a pedophile needs to become the modern “Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam”

    (In ancient Rome it was traditional to end every speech, no matter what the speech was about, with the phrase, “Carthage must be destroyed.”)

    • reksas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      if democrats regain power, it will just be the wheel turning in wait of republicans regaining power later. while that side of the wheel is better than current one, what america needs to do is break the fucking wheel.

      • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yep, Republicans break things, and get voted out. Democrats try to fix what they broke, but it takes a long time and is expensive and boring, so they get voted out. The cycle repeats and is grinding us to dust.

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, the danger of a Democratic president is the left growing complacent again, allowing the right to fester and come up with another dictator.

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Today it’s tradition to end every tweet with THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION YO THIS IMPORTANT MATTER.

  • moakley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Well duh.

    This was my second thought when I heard the news. My first thought wasn’t so much a thought as it was an all-too-familiar stabbing pain in the middle of my brain accompanied by a feeling that if I had to put into words would translate to “oh god.”

  • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    A qr code as a stamp that takes you to an easy list about Trump’s Epstein ties would be easy enough to make

  • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    A quick internet search reveals:

    Whoever […] defaces, disfigures, […], or does any other thing to any bank […] note […] with intent to render such […] unfit to be reissued, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.

    18 U.S. Code § 333

    So personally I wouldn’t bet on this not being illegal. On the other hand, freedom of opinion might save your butt. But what do I know about US law?

    • thisbenzingring@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      there so much defaced money already out there

      you’d have to really make a big scene where it makes a lot of noise to even stand out

    • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The MAGoos have been stamping ‘Donald Trump Lives Here’ on US currency for years.

      They are supposed to do it on bills that show the White House, but they’ve also put in on $5 bills that show the Lincoln Memorial

    • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well but see the intent isn’t to render it unfit to be reissued, the whole point is that you want it to stay in circulation so as many people as possible see the additional message.

      • drath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is legalese. The

        “with intent to render such bank bill, draft, note, or other evidence of debt unfit to be reissued”

        probably relates only to the

        “or does any other thing to any bank bill, draft, note, or other evidence of debt”

        part, and not the whole

        “Whoever mutilates, cuts, defaces, disfigures, or perforates, or unites or cements together”

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        No. If you can’t spell out “rapist” on facebook without being canceled. you sure as hell can bet your butt on a dollar note with that remark not staying in circulation. and you’re supposed to know that. so if you write that on a dollar bill, i don’t think it’s “plausible deniability” to say “i considered this dollar bill fine for further circulation”.

        • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          You wouldn’t need plausible deniability because the prosecution would have to prove that your intent was to make the bill unfit for circulation. Intent is already notoriously difficult to prove in a court of law, and it would be very difficult to prove someone wanted to take a bill out of circulation by writing a message on it that they hoped would be seen by people.

          Even if the result is that the bill gets taken out of circulation, the court would have to prove that you knew that would happen and wanted it to.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      On the other hand, freedom of opinion might save your butt.

      It almost certainly would… if you have the money to win a lawsuit on First Amendment grounds, which is far from cheap.

    • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      As someone else already pointed out, the “with intent to render such […] unfit to be reissued” part is key here.

      The Stamp Stampede has a good resource on this.

      Essentially, the argument just boils down to the fact that you’re… not making the bill unusable. As long as the denomination is still visible and not altered to another number, and it’s possible to see anti-fraud measures like the green seal well enough, you’re not rendering it unfit for circulation.

      There is the problem of ATMs sometimes rejecting stamped bills (or accepting them but having the bank send them back to the Fed to be replaced with new, clean ones) but afaik it’s rare and not too likely as long as you don’t cover the denomination.

      Most businesses don’t reject stamped bills as they have no reason to expect additional markings would mean a bill is actually NOT real, and most people won’t decide to just never spend it again because it has a stamp.

      As long as you don’t promote/advertise a business, or change the actual denomination of the bill, you’re fine.

    • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      To be fair, there’s a whole lot of difference between defacing a banknote vs. rendering it unfit for issue.

      In any case, cause of how often it changes hands, and how little supervision its under, it’d be very difficult to actually identify who defaced a specific note - especially if you’ve git a whole bunch of people doing it to a whole bunch of notes

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      with intent to render such […] unfit to be reissued

      This isn’t trying to take it out of circulation tho, so that probably wouldn’t apply. They’d have to make an argument that effectively goes against the first amendment to say you can’t write on currency you plan to spend.

  • glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why is the top account in the screenshot? Does anyone care that they love the idea or did we just want to advertise their substack for them?

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The Trump bill will be cancelled quickly, because they will find that they are pulping more of those bills than all others combined, because they are constantly defaced, and Trump ordered that any defaced bills be destroyed immediately.

    I’m going to vandalize every single one that comes through my hands, with “I’m a PedoCon” or “I’m a traitor” or “I am virtuosically incompetent” etc…

  • Johandea@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Shouldn’t it say “I am a pedophile”, with his signature marking it a signed confession?

  • SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This would also bring a new Leopards Eating Faces episode were MAGAs would shred all the bills offending their Fuhrange, and then crying for the money loss.

    • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, they do it all the time with beer and whatever without realizing. I’m not sure if they would realize it when it came to money.