• HailHydra@infosec.pubEnglish
    1·
    2 months ago

    I’m not sure if it’s the same scientists, but the YouTube channel The Thought Emporium has an ongoing series about growing neurons to play retro games (such as OG DOOM).

    The playlist of this series is fittingly called Building the Torment Nexus.

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    1·
    2 months ago

    Raises uncomfortable questions about consciousness. The only difference between these neurons and your own are the number of them and the structures they form. Of course it doesn’t know what it’s doing, but… Neither do our own neurons

      • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
        1·
        2 months ago

        Science and Ethics — the age old enmity between “I wanna know” and “I’m not allowed to find out” “Am I able to find out without doing something monstrously inhumane”

        FTFY

        I guess my point is that sometimes even if it’s illegal you can get away with it if done correctly, with ruling party aligned stated goals…or you have access to a shit tonne of money and powerful friends.

        • luciferofastora@feddit.org
          0·
          2 months ago

          I simplified for comedic effect. You’re absolutely right that the “compromise” would be finding some humane and ethical solution, but “The most effective and direct way of finding out is cruel and callous” isn’t quite as snappy.

          I guess my point is that sometimes even if it’s illegal you can get away with it if done correctly, with ruling party aligned stated goals…or you have access to a shit tonne of money and powerful friends.

          That kinda dodges the conflict by not engaging with ethical concerns at all. I feel like calling it a solution would be morbid, but it does make the problem stop being a problem…

          • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
            0·
            2 months ago

            That kinda dodges the conflict by not engaging with ethical concerns at all.

            I guess I…kinda lost the plot a bit when I wrote the second part, eh?

            There’s ethics…and then there’s what the government in the country a scientist operates in views as “morally and ethically acceptable”.
            Stem cell research was banned in most places for a long time. The US is banning CRISPR, if I remember right, the OG Nazis, Soviets and Empire of Japan (and honestly basically everyone else too, just those are the three that were highlighted when I was in school) rubber-stamped and funded research that should warrant execution by vivisection…die by your own methods and all that.

            You’re right it’s not really a solution. However the realities of modern society means that there’s room within what is morally and ethically acceptable in any country to operate in both a humane and inhumane fashion. And if it doesn’t then money and connections to those in power allow further leeway to be an example of humanity at it’s best…or a monster in a human suit…

            • luciferofastora@feddit.org
              0·
              2 months ago

              I guess I…kinda lost the plot a bit when I wrote the second part, eh?

              I think I got where you were going, I was just saying that someone trying to find a way around the legal restrictions indicates they’re not actually concerned about ethics, just about not getting in trouble for it. In that context, the problem “How do I do this in an ethically acceptable manner?” is “solved” with the answer “I don’t care”.

              Generally, laws are the standard solution to ambiguities. Ethics are a murky and often subjective topic, so it makes sense to form some sort of common agreement on what is okay and what isn’t. And where there are laws, there are gonna be cunts proving exactly why we had to write it down in the first place…

    • KindnessisPunk@piefed.caEnglish
      0·
      2 months ago

      I mean it’s the same question we’ve been asking all our lives about the animals, fetuses and now AI. When does it stop being a flowchart and start being a consciousness.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      0·
      2 months ago

      Nueralink did pretty much the same thing to monkeys that are actually concision. So it this different only because those are human neurons? Is human consciousness different than animal consciousness?

      • Paddzr@lemmy.world
        0·
        2 months ago

        Yes. Because it’s us. Anything not us is always going to be less valuable. You’d kill 100 lions if it means saving 1 human.

        • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
          0·
          2 months ago

          Lions are not conscious. And I’m not asking about value. Of course we value human consciousness more than monkey consciousness. We don’t grant monkeys any rights. Hell, we assign more value to unconscious (brain dead) humans than to conscious monkeys. But how exactly is human consciousness different?

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        0·
        2 months ago

        I’m not sure this is quite analagous to neuralink’s monkey experiments. That said,

        So is this different only because those are human neurons?

        To my mind, a neuron is a neuron. The only difference between your brain and a monkey brain is, again, the number of neurons and the structures they form. I don’t see this as any different from monkey or rat or ant or entirely digital neurons.

        • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
          0·
          2 months ago

          I’m not sure this is quite analagous to neuralink’s monkey experiments.

          Why not? It’s a chip reading inputs from neurons. This meme doesn’t make it clear if the chip was also stimulation neurons but Neuralink has plans for neural stimulation and it’s possible this was also tested on monkeys. So what’s the difference?

      • MDCCCLV@lemmy.caEnglish
        0·
        2 months ago

        That was just to try and make the equipment work at all, it wasn’t about doing anything with software. It’s the opposite where you’re only worried about the physical damage and infection.

        • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
          0·
          2 months ago

          I was focusing more on the “hooking up conscious brain to computer” part than about the damage and infection part.

          Thought experiment: let’s say we have a dead brain patient. You have verified that there is no neural activity in the brain beyond cerebellum. There’s no consciousness in the brain. Legally it’s still considered a person. You can’t for example shoot them.

          We also have a 5kg blob of lab grown human brain tissue. We have verified there is neural activity in the entire blob but we don’t know what it’s doing and we can’t communicate with it.

          Which one is more conscious? Which one should be considered more human and should have more rights?

    • Zacryon@feddit.org
      0·
      2 months ago

      And now bring artificial neural networks, i.e., AI, into the picture to make it even more spicy.

    • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.ukEnglish
      0·
      2 months ago

      Baby steps towards growing a Wolfenstein guy, we’ll get there. Maybe around the time they put Trump in a life support mech.

      It’ll be good telly, I bet.

  • Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io
    0·
    2 months ago

    Ok, so maybe 200K brain cells would be sufficient to run for public office, but you can’t really call that a complete brain, containing approximately 100 billion cells.

    • matlag@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      0·
      2 months ago

      Public office might still be borderline, but we have a living proof that POTUS is within reach.

  • frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io
    0·
    2 months ago

    Having worked with human neurons harvested from dead people, there are worse ways to extend your life. At least these ones get to play games instead of getting poked and zapped by me.

    • ameancow@lemmy.worldEnglish
      0·
      2 months ago

      They just made a basic microcontroller out of organic chemistry, relax and learn even basic science before you get murderously bent out of shape by the next sensationalist clickbait headline.

  • red_sock@lemmy.ml
    0·
    2 months ago

    Computer Scientists: We can make Doom run on any device!

    Bioscientists: Watch this!

  • Xella@lemmy.world
    0·
    2 months ago

    So we can do this with functioning brain cells but we can’t have abortions? Seems a bit… fucked

    • bampop@lemmy.world
      0·
      2 months ago

      OK but hear me out here, I think I have the beginnings of a business plan:

      1. Create the Torment Nexus

      2. ?

      3. Profit

      Some components of the plan are still under development, but let’s not lose momentum. We can advance with the initial phase while brainstorming to refine the plan in real time as we progress. It’s an exciting opportunity and we mustn’t forfeit our first-to-market advantage.

    • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
      0·
      2 months ago

      Scientists: “No, this isn’t The Torment Nexus, this is ‘The Nexus of Torment’! It’s totally different!”

      • MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works
        0·
        2 months ago

        Maybe this experience is just a higher being’s analog of Doom and we’re just cells in a petri dish running an MMORPG version it. Stupidest simulation theory ever, but hey man, we’re sorta doing it so how stupid can it be?