It doesn’t sound like Hate, it sounds like Slavery.
Hate would be activelly going out and trying to kill women, whilst punishing them for not letting their bodies be used by others as objects is, IMHO, much more a Slaver’s take on other human beings.
A Slaver’s motivation would also be pretty in tune with Tradition for Republican members of the power elites in North Carolina.
It’s a different and more complicated kind of hate. I find it useful to split bigotry into bigotry to dominate and bigotry to exterminate. American racism towards black people is the former, while American racism towards indigenous people is the latter.
Misogyny is almost always about domination, but it’s a unique kind because they can’t switch to extermination or even bluff it. They can’t hide women away to exist quietly in the background. They’re fully dependent on women to reproduce, and for most misogynistic men, for sexual pleasure. Many of them resent that they’re dependent on those they see as inferior for such things and that they can be leveraged.
So yeah, this is hate, just a hate that they can deny because they don’t want to think that they hate women, just women’s independence.
Well, I suppose the broader point I’m making is that it’s Sociopathy/Psychopathy.
The most harm done to people (I would even say, the most Evil) comes from people who couldn’t care less for how other people feel because they have no Empathy with other people’s suffering, and thus when they can will do whatever to others for their own personal upsides, even if those “upsides” are only satisfying their own personal petty psychological desires such as those you point out.
Hate actually involves some element of thinking of and caring about the other person (though a negative “caring”, of the “I want to make them suffer”), a kind of Evil which is very rare in real life even if it’s the most common in the movie “evil guy” stereotype.
As I’ve learned (from amongst other things working in the Finance Industry), the most common Evil is people knowingly doing things harmful to others to make money for themselves, get (more) power and influence or simply satisfy petty internal desires such as wanting to feel dominance over others (this later being, IMHO, the core of Moralism).
That’s fair, but we also don’t know that he doesn’t actively hate women. Just because you don’t want someone dead doesn’t mean you don’t have active hatred for them.
Most evil is banal, but quite a few people move to hating groups that they initially were hurting out of self interested gain. I’ve seen plenty of hate and it’s often a means of bypassing empathy for some reason or another
God this is a good comment
Removing the remnants of a miscarriage is also coded as an abortion. So theres still plenty of hate in this bill as well.
Hopefully they won’t pass a law requiring shotgun weddings in the case of pregnancy.
You’ve also got to remember that most of these people have never had a proper relationship with a woman in their lives, so they wouldn’t know about any of this.
Abortions are actually very common due to miscarriages. I was personally affected by this and was present for a 9 month old abortion of a stillbirth. Even though my wife gave birth it was classified as an abortion because the baby had passed. We even have a abortion certificate.
So, according to proposed law a gunman could enter the hospital and kill the doctors, nurses, my wife and me in order to stop an abortion of a dead baby.
Makes perfect sense.
This is unbelievable. I remember reading into misogyny through the ages and there was a law like this in one of earth’s oldest human societies. How have we gone this far back???
Religion. That’s why. It’s cancer.
Really? Because I see only one religion pushing this shit, and it’s Christianity.
Despite the fact abortion, in terms of it being a threat to the mother’s life, is perfectly acceptable in the Bible.
I beg to differ. Today this is moneyed elites throwing certifiably insane people concessions because sane people would impose taxes on the rich. To the wealthy protecting their money comes before the freedom of the masses.
Killing live people - women, children, POCs, poor, other countries, etc - has always been acceptable and even promoted by Republicans. It’s only ending potential pregnancies when they “care” about lives. Except of course when it’s their wife, mistress, daughter who wants an abortion, then it’s ok.
The Only Moral Abortion Is My Abortion
This is 26 years old and still worth your time if you’ve never read it.
If I were to summarize how this fits into long term republican vision of society it would be the following.
“Abortion, like healthcare, home ownership, and free speech is a thing we should reserve solely to for the wealthy and anybody making less than 2 million a year should not have access to any of these things”
“Rules for thee, not for me.”
2 million a year is a close to perfect way to divide the owning class for the rest of us. A surgeon has more in common with a grocery store clerk than a CEO and people really don’t understand that.
Honestly in some ways the actual number doesn’t matter, if you earn your living by selling your labor for a salary or wages you aren’t the problem
has always been acceptable by
RepublicansAmericansFixed that for you
She doesn’t even need to be pregnant, you just have to claim to believe she was about to commit an abortion. Free women murders for everyone!
It’s worse when you realize the bill isn’t about the woman, but her doctor.
Well that explains why it’s ok to kill a woman and therefore her fetus to prevent her from killing her fetus. It’s not, but you can keep every abortion doctor in the area to prevent them from performing the procedure.
Do you have to have “standing”? Like do you actually have to even know the woman or is this just an open bounty on doctors?
We already have a shortage of doctors as a whole and obstetricians have been fleeing red states for years now…
Replace Republicans with Americans.
They share the blame.
Wouldn’t the use of deadly force to prevent the abortion actually aid the abortion?
I mean Republicans are stupid and all but I think they’re intending for this to be a deterrent. It’s a stupid and cruel deterrent, but it’s probably not meant to somehow kill the woman without killing the baby.
it might not be meant for that, but it will be used to excuse that
essentially through the entire pregnancy people will get to be terrified as all it’d take to legally murder them would be making them look like they wanted an abortion
I’m pretty sure that I saw a depressing statistic about the number of pregnant women getting murdered now. An unfortunate number of men murder their pregnant wives/girlfriends.
Look, if they thought things through they wouldn’t be Republicans.
I’m increasingly the opinion that Republicans don’t actually know where babies come from.
people keep talking about “first-degree murder”
is there “second-degree murder”?
Generally speaking, second degree doesn’t involve premeditation. You get in a bar fight and kill someone or walk in on your wife with another man and shoot in a blind rage.
Manslaughter is generally when you kill someone criminally without intent. That would be something like running a stoplight, which is a crime, and t-boning a car killing a passenger. You were committing a non-violent crime with no intent to hurt anyone, but you still killed someone.
Felony Murder in many states is when you commit a felony that leads to someone’s death. For instance, you commit arson for insurance money (a felony), and someone gets killed trying to put it out. It’s also been used on robbery accomplices when their partner kills someone.
Depraved Heart Murder is when you knowingly do something so incredibly reckless someone is likely to get killed and choose to move forward. The depraved indifference in that case is considered malice aforethought (essentially intent). An example would be knowingly selling tainted medicine for profit. A great real-life example was the Schlitterbahn executive that paid off injury victims for a dangerous waterside to keep them quiet because the slide was really profitable until a kid was decapitated by the ride. The executive was charged with murder for covering up the dangerous ride instead of shutting down and fixing it.
thanks
so just to clarify, insurance companies intentionally delaying care to patients would be depraved heart murder, right?
Yes:
Second-degree murder
Any intentional killing that is not premeditated or planned. A situation in which the killer intends only to inflict serious bodily harm, knowing this could result in death but with no specific intent to kill, constitutes depraved-heart murder, which can be considered as second-degree murder.
Are they punished differently in the US? In most countries there isn’t really a distinction because of the difficulty in proving intent.
If somebody repeatedly kicks and punches somebody into unconsciousness and ultimately kills them from internal bleeding is that first degree or second degree?
Likely second, unless there was some evidence it was planned in some way. Like, if they also found a text talking about how much they hated that guy and wished he was dead, you could make a case for first. If there was a plan to bring the person to an isolated location for their fight, it would likely be first in that case. Same could be said for tracking their work shifts in preparation, casing their house to see when they’re alone, etc.
Intent is not the difference. The difference is planning.
I am not a lawyer, but this my understand:
If you’re enjoying a quiet time in the park and a kid shouts, which disturbs you, so you shoot the kid in the head. You intended to kill the kid. You aimed at his head and shot a deadly weapon.
However, it was not planned. Your plan was to enjoy a quiet time in the park. You just killed the kid because of a momentary rage. You didn’t even know the kid.
I believe that would be second degree.
If you didn’t intend to kill, that would be something else, like gross negligence or whatever. For example running a red light and killing a kid that you didn’t even see because your enormous American car (which you call a truck, but the bed is always empty). That would not be first or second degree murder. In America it may just result in a traffic violation because you ran a red light. Might be a 100$ fine.
Depends state to state, in some, first degree is basically terrorists and serial killers.
First degree usually means premeditation
I think this pieces of shit see the handmaid’s tale as a manual and not as a warning.
“Pro life”
“Pro Rape” imo.
“Pro quantity” vs “pro quality”.
It’s only pro life as long as the child is being carried.
Once the kids out, they don’t give a fuck about the woman or her child. They could both die, and they’d have no issue with it.
It’s only pro life as long as the child is being carried.
Not even then, at this point. Using ‘deadly force’ on a pregnant woman is not going to go well for the fetus.
How is this even pro life anymore T-T
It never was. “Pro-life” was just a weaponized slogan.
What they really stand for is “Forced birth” and “Promiscuous women should be punished”.
Promiscuouswomen should be punishedThere, fixed it for you. Nothing promiscuous about getting raped
Nothing promiscuous about getting raped
You and I know that, sure.
But conservatives love victim-blaming in rape cases.
“Did you see what she was wearing? Her collar bone and ankles were showing. Slut was asking for it, she probably liked it”
Ugh
I was actually quite stumped by the “abortion is murder!” argument initially as it can get philosophical quick on what constitutes a life that can be “murdered” (i.e. does it have to be birthed, walking, able, etc, this is a bad summary)— but the spike in alt right violence against women, children, and just people in general in the US made the hypocrisy glaringly obvious.
but the spike in alt right violence against women, children, and just people in general in the US made the hypocrisy glaringly obvious.
A woman’s chance of getting murdered while pregnant (already distressingly high) has already increased significantly in states that outlawed abortion.
Oh, I know. Just pointing out the duality of their bullshit.
Idk why babies don’t just pull themselves up by their bootstraps.
Yep pro life ends at birth
they don’t actually care about the child, or its mother, before it’s born, either. if they did, our health care system wouldn’t be a for-profit scam.
And they wouldn’t be letting people use deadly force on pregnant women.
A lot of the lobbying money for anti healthcare stuff comes from woowoo supplement companies etc. Imo we should be regulating the shit out of those companies at every level of government. Ban advertising for the products to prevent false claims, etc.
in texas, they have breeding facility for minors that got impregnated by ice agents, to hide the rape from the public.
Is it normal in the USA to allow the general population to use deadly force? That’s fucked up.
Lots of ifs/ands/ors/ and buts. Varies by state and generally only under legally defined self defense situations with some judicial discrepancy, mind you it varies by state and some regions are so loose with it that you can just get murdered by going on someone’s property. Which may make sense if you live in the middle of fucking nowhere and give warnings and are a thirty minute drive from another person but there have been cases where shit like that happens in suburbs,.
How’d the USA get to be a nation in the first place?
Hugs and kisses!
Uuhh… Yeah? Second amendment.
If you went back in time and showed them a modern day assault rifle, they would probably have some opinions about the second amendment.
Doesn’t using deadly force on a pregnant woman defeat the purpose entirely?
Using deadly force against a pregnant woman leads to a dying fetus. That’s just the same thing the long way around. It also gives an infinite loophole to use deadly force against someone using deadly force. Basically the whole country could kill itself legally, with only one person surviving 🤷🏻♂️
Shhhh, logic is not allowed here.
Not if you’re using deadly force against a doctor willing to perform an abortion, which is the more likely intent of the law.
Or the driver taking her somewhere. Or the person who called the driver.
And so on.
I didn’t even think of that. This is just gonna green light a lot of psychopathic behavior.
There is no purpose besides cruelty. Whatever the shittiest interpretaion is, that’s what the republicans are gonna want to go with.
Depends on what you think the true purpose of a law like this would be.
Now she’s getting it.
Voters hate women… you don’t have to vote for these ass clowns but you do anyway and I bet a significant portion of women vote for them., just as they do for Trump. in particular white women vote Trump
There’s no mystery. White women handed Trump the election
https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2024-11-07/white-women-vote-donald-trump-kamala-harris
Lemme get this right…
If you see someone trying to kill a woman while claiming she’s trying to get an abortion, you can kill this attacker without issue under the legal classification of acting to protect two people, including a soon-born. Is this what Republicans want? To facilitate the legal argument to kill right-wingers? Because I’d be totally fine with that.
You can shoot someone who is threatening the life of another person anyway.
Or any doctor prescribed a morning after pill or installed a IUD
By similar logic, couldn’t one kill the legislators who passed this bill? They are clearly inviting violence upon pregnant women, so it should theoretically be legal to kill them in defense of those women if this bill passes.
don’t bring logic in here!
No, no, let em cook
you’d be legally right but the cops will still squeal up in their full military gear and shoot you all the same. Although to be fair they were probably going to do that anyway.
Yeah I mean, previous and current fascism being the same, having an extra legal avenue to kill a fascist is always welcome.
