• Jiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Not only 0% alcohol, also 0% taste and 0% beer. There are great alcohol free beers out there btw. This ain’t it.

    • Blanka@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      If you try them in Europe they are great. And even there underage kids are not allowed to buy them

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      What’s this actually taste like? I figure it’s basically what they added to bud light to make bud select if it wasn’t just water. Bud light - 110 calories, 4.2% alc. Select - 55 calories 2.1% alcohol.

      I remember looking at it when it came out and thinking they filled half the bottle with carbonated water and sold it for slightly more.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        What is it with Americans and bud light anyway. It’s the worst version of the product and yet for some reason it’s really popular in the US.

        • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          Because you can drink it all day and still drive home.

          I’d say this is sarcasm, but I live in a rural area and have heard it calls ‘driving beer’ before. And looking in the ditches, it appears to be true.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          It’s common and they were already in place when prohibition ended.

          So after a good chunk of time with all the breweries becoming unavailable, they were fast to start selling and it just became a common brand.

          Having the three key elements to an alcohol consumed for social purposes rather than taste also helped: cheap, available and cheap.

          We’ve got others around, but they’re generally not everywhere.

          I don’t know that I’ve ever heard anyone say they like the taste though. I think the closest I’ve heard is someone saying they like how it’s cold.

  • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    This shit should be illegal zero alcohol or not we should not allow advertisement of beer to children. Where the fuck protect the children groups on this shit?

    • stopforgettingit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      If this store is in the US they are stupid for making this sign and they can get in quite a bit of trouble for this with ABC. NA beer is still 21 and over, its not “beer for kids”

    • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      German here. I’m absolutely flabbergasted that this incomprehensible opinion has 20 upvotes.

      0% alcohol is 0% alcohol. What the fuck are you talking about?

          • Mentando@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            14 days ago

            I was under the impression that “alkoholfrei” / “alcohol free” could be up to 0.5%, whereas 0.0% really needed to be without any alcohol. Your link is only about the first case, if I read it correctly. They do state though that “without alcohol” should really be without.

            Edit: further research seems to indicate that it is unfortunately not quite clear and you are correct: “. Sobald der vorhandene Alkoholgehalt mindestens 0,05 Volumenprozent beträgt, ist die Angabe „alkoholfrei“ um die Angabe „(< 0,5 % vol)“ zu ergänzen.” - https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/weinv_1995/WeinV_1995.pdf -> only once you exceed 0.05% do you need to declare <0.5%

            Very disappointing indeed. Why not have them call it <0.5% and <0.05% and have the customer take an informed decision? Of course because the industry then says: “Dear government this is too hard, let us deceive the customers 🥺”

            • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 days ago

              There’s no deception: <0.05 rounds to the two significant digits 0.0 (0.050001 would round to 0.1)

              It’s impossible to have absolutely no alcohol in something that had sugar and living micro-organisms in it at any point: e.g. fruits and therefore juice have alcohol.

              That why you don’t need to label anything with less than 1.2% alcohol. You can only be sure that something has less when it says 0.0% or „alkoholfrei“.

          • Fawkes@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 days ago

            So 19yr olds shouldn’t be advertised to? What’s the cut off?

            I actually fully agree that all advertisement is awful and support removing it entirely.

            But lacking that, I don’t see an issue with advertising universally. And if we’re going to restrict advertisement to children, target actual children. “Teenagers” includes people legally old enough to join the military and kill other humans.

            • cosmos8188@leminal.space
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 days ago

              Honestly, you’re right, but the issue is deeper than that. Ads like this indoctrinate people that aren’t even children - this includes teenagers past 13 and even adults of varying stages.

              Advertising harmful drugs shouldnt be done at all - but in the meantime, teenagers and even young adults should be except. Also the killing part is a totally different issue.

              • Fawkes@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                14 days ago

                Sure, but the primary complaint was against a 0% alcohol beer targeted at “Children” by nature of using the term “Under Age.” I have no complaints against wanting to remove advertising, in general, including drug advertisements.

                • cosmos8188@leminal.space
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  “Children” by nature of using the term “Under Age.”

                  Which consequently includes teenagers and young adults within it - which aren’t children.

      • thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        There used to be candy that looked like cigarettes and soft drinks made to look like a champagne bottles, and at some point we decided that was not a good idea.

        I drink and I smoke, but I also think it’s not a good idea to get children used to those things. You can drink responsibly but there’s no quantity of alcohol that does zero damage, and the less we get young people used to them the better.

        • LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          I drink and I smoke, but I also think it’s not a good idea to get children used to those things.

          Unfortunately, there isn’t a “one size fits all solution”. When I was a kid, I had the candy cigarettes, champagne bottles, cap-guns to play " cops and robbers", and bb-guns to “shoot things” (trash usually)

          As an adult, I don’t smoke, I’ll have a beer once a month or less, and I haven’t robbed any banks nor go hunting. Mainly because, as an adult, I’m not interested in those things.

          However, as a child, these were tools to pretend and often pretending involves replicating your environment. I definitely grew-up in a rural area, but on (80-90s) television when everyone is smoking and drinking, your relatives smoke and drink - it’s normalized.

          I would argue that the social shift towards no smoking and less drinking for adults, has a greater affect on children than a ban on stick shaped candy in a box.

          (Now marketing vaping to young people with addictive “fun” chemical flavoring: that is evil and should be banned)

          edit: fixed a couple of words

        • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          I drink non-alcoholic beer because I like the flavor of beer.

          there’s no quantity of alcohol that does zero damage

          There’s also no non-alcoholic fruit juice, so you should be all for 0% beer, which has less alcohol than any carton of apple juice you can buy.

          • thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 days ago

            It’s not really about the alcohol content per se.

            The issue is getting young and impressionable children used to the idea of drinking beer.

            • Fawkes@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 days ago

              I’m pretty sure young and impressionable children get used to the idea of drinking beer from friends and family. I think the bigger issue is that the drinking age is fucking 21. It’s absolutely nonsense. If you want to protect children from alcohol abuse, talk to them, teach them, let them have alcohol when they’re ready to try it, in safe settings.

      • creamfresh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        Absolute fringe opinion even in Germany. Most shops and bars refuse to serve 0.0 to teens below legal drinking age (which already is ridiculously low), ads also don’t target them.

        • Fawkes@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          Below drinking age, sure. I think the nonsense here is that the US considers you “Under age” until you’re 21. So you’re complaining about an ad targeting children, when the target is literally “Anybody under the age of 21.” Which is an unfair complaint to make.

          Because using that same logic, “under age” porn is actually legal. Because at 18 you can get fucked in the ass by 3 dudes at once, but not buy a beer.

          I hear you say “But there are different ages for X and Y.” Yeah, but it’s the exact same term used to mean the same idea with completely different ranges and neither has any justification beyond “Uh… Here’s the cut-off I guess?”

          Would you take issue with 18yr olds having beer ads aimed at them? Because that’s technically “Under Age Beer!” And they’d be considered full adults here in Germany.

            • Fawkes@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 days ago

              Sure, I’m not against that at all. I hate advertisements and would take no issue with a universal ban. My problem was with the arbitrary moral outrage at this advertisement targeting “Children,” by virtue of the utterly meaningless phrase “Under Age,” which includes actual, legitimate adults, in the US.

        • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          Hahaha what weird corner do you live in? Completely unbelievable in Bavaria.

          Not saying that I like the drinking culture here, but you’re not describing the reality here.

      • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        So, there are these things called candy cigarettes. They are candy shaped like cigarettes. Despite simply being things like bubble gum or chocolate, it turns out that people who ate them as kids are about twice as likely to smoke real cigarettes as adults. This has resulted in them being banned as advertising tobacco products to children in a good number of countries. This add for nonalcoholic beer specifically saying that minors can buy it can easily be argued to be the same kind of thing, with the same kind of legal response. If consuming non-alcoholic beer as a minor results in significantly higher rates of alcohol consumption as an adult, then ads for non-alcoholic beer that target children, like the one shown, might be worth a ban.

      • Vrtrx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        What does you being German have anything to do with it? Completely ignoring that no, being able to legally advertise it as 0% doesn’t mean it has 0%, in Germany non-alcoholic beer is still beer and doesn’t get advertised to children. That would be fucking insane to do.

        • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          You’re confusing „ohne Alkohol“/0.0% beer with „alkoholfrei“/“non-alcoholic” beer.

          In Germany, drinks only have to be labeled as alcoholic from 1.2% upwards, so

          • unlabeled fruit juice may have up to 1.2% (has more likely 0.3% or so)
          • alkoholfrei may have up to 0.5%
          • 0,0 may have 0,0% (rounded down from up to 0,04999…%)

          https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alkoholfrei

        • Fawkes@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          Except the US concept of underage also includes people 16 to 20, which this ad is undoubtedly target towards. If it was an ad for beer with bright colours and cartoon characters I would agree, but it is not.

    • protist@retrofed.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      The “protect the children” groups have federal cover now to actively harm children, which is what they always wanted to do anyway

    • MatSeFi@lemmy.liebeleu.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      Why? Because it is also ~0%sugar? Ban ads for coke instead.

      Edit: know a lot of people saying that 0%beer tastes not the same (what I can agree on) and thats why they do not drink alc free beer. Could imagine the effect works also the other way round.

    • blackberry28@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      This is very likely form the US where u need to be 21 to buy beer. So even a 20 year old would be a child to you? This is dumb af.

    • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      I love a good beer. Budweiser is not a good beer, and the thought of a zero version sounds even worse.

      But there are great beers and even very good non alchoholic ones.

      My issue is that beer is a lot of calories, particularly the good ones. Even the zero alcoholic ones.

      Don’t drink your calories is a good rule of thumb.

    • Polisheocket@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      It helps my sober friends that used to down a 12-30 beers a night not lose that flavor. But to market to kids is pathetic

    • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      You mean, like, all beer? I love that you have your own preferences, it’s a human right. It’s definitely an acquired taste for most people.

      • I’ve had one beer I thought tasted pretty good (a Sam Adam’s Cherry Wheat lager). It tasted like cherries. Like a slightly carbonated cherry juice; not beer with a hint of cherry.

        I’ve never seen it being sold anywhere since. :(

        Pretty sure I just hate the taste of hops. I have no tolerance for bitter flavours. Really sucks when my dad or sister cook, because I can hella taste when they burn any garlic used in it as it becomes super bitter.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    They saw that younger people aren’t drinking nearly as much, so they thought this might be a solution? Get kids used to the flavor earlier?

    Sadly, I’m sure there are plenty of shitty parents who would buy this for their kids.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      I don’t think there’s many parents that would buy this for their kids. I grew up knowing friends parents would would just straight up buy you actual beer. But knowing them, if they saw this, I imagine them saying “Then what’s the fucking point??? Pussyass bullshit!” While at the same time putting 2-24packs in the cart, and then saying “For you and your little friends when they get here.”

  • Lasherz@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Seems fake. It’s also not legal AFAIK to sell non alcoholic beer to minors since it’s still got some alcohol in it. Then again I guess vanilla extract and mouth wash does too.

    • thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      There’s a difference between non-alcoholic (or alcohol-free) and 0.0% alcohol (like it appears in the poster). The former allows for up to 0.5% ABV, while the latter means absolutely no alcohol whatsoever.

      Still I don’t think it’s a good idea to get children used to the idea of drinking alcoholic beverages.

      • robin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        They say “contains less than 0.5%” because that’s the cutoff that makes something legally beer. It more than likely has none, much of the time. That’s just the law (US):

        > 0.5% it’s beer and subject to alcohol laws

        < 0.5% it’s not beer, technically a food

        So they label it as <0.5% simply to show that it’s in the latter category. This creates a lot of confusion for some reason.

        Even the grocers (and even manufacturers) get it all messed up. Hell, half the brands don’t have required nutritional info (beer doesn’t need it, soda does) but the real problem is that:

        The regulatory agencies are captured and don’t do shit anymore. TECHNICALLY the FDA should be stepping in and making them put full nutritional information on all the brands of NA “beer” and making sure it is labeled and sold like a soda.

        But the larger companies that sell it are just misclassifying it and creating problems to be as lazy and risk avoidant as possible.

    • kungen@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      Only >0,5% ABV is classified as an “alcoholic beverage” federally.

    • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Alcohol never did anything for me except make me sleepy. And now with kidney failure I can’t have social anyway.

      I keep na beer because I like the taste and probably every month or so have one with pizza or something.

      Even cheap beer is fine.

  • frunch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    The AI slop used to generate the ad poster contained a nice suggestion for an alternative name for this crap:

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I’m having trouble telling if the poster is AI slop or the entire picture is.

      The box of Budweiser looks 99% fine to me (bear in mind, I’m not American so I don’t know if that’s what it looks like), but the text on the close edge of the top side of the box looks weird to me. Buuut it could also just be compression artifacts.

      • ShortFuse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        Can and box are real and sold in Canada.

        Poster is AI slop. Either added into the image or made by the store. Budweiser wouldn’t be promoting Corona, a competitor.

    • WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      I think these people haven’t been aware of near-beer sales to kids going back over 60 years. Kids have been able to buy them here in Canada for longer than that, that is just the oldest person I have know to buy a 6pack of near-beer as a 5 year old kid.

    • Mantzy81@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      You know how you can’t buy those sugar “cigarettes” anymore? Same reason.

      You also can’t buy snortable children’s Tylenol.

      • Pennywise@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        You can, actually. They’re on Amazon.

        Snortable children’s Tylenol… That’s a great idea. Do you work in marketing?

        • TheFogan@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          It’s interesting because, in the US technically they aren’t allowed to be labeled Cigarettes (in most countries they are outright illegal), Just did check amazon, and you can see the actual packaging just says “bubble gum”, or “candy”. Though I think the amazon listing using the word, may actually not be within the law.

    • terranoid@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      Because it’s clear they want kids to start drinking budweiser young. It’s marketing budweiser to minors, whether it has alcohol or not. And it’s marketing alcohol (“it’s BEER for under age”) to youth… Beer by default has alcohol. This is marketing beer to literal children.

      What do you think all that marketing does? Gets them drinking more budweiser as adults, and probably interested in alcohol while underage. Shady as fuck.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    I don’t know if this is a hot take or not but alcohol free beer is pointless. I don’t believe anybody actually drinks beer for the taste because it objectively doesn’t taste all that great, people like beer because of the association it has with having a good time with your friends, nobody drinks it as a refreshing beverage.

    The fact that beer doesn’t actually taste all that good is why people invented cocktails.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Not true at all. I love the taste of beer alone, AND in combination with certain foods. Not all beer of course, they make so many different kinds that it would be impossible to love them all.

      I’m not going through the trouble and expense of cooking a steak if there isn’t going to be a beer accompanying it.

    • ReluctantZen@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      I don’t believe anybody actually drinks beer for the taste because it objectively doesn’t taste all that great

      That’s like, your opinion man.

      Plenty of people, like me, drink beer for the taste. I’m not all that fond of sweet drinks, so I actually tend to dislike cocktails or mixed drinks.

    • MyButSmellsBat@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      I actually like the taste of beer, especially the bitterness and a bit of fruity taste without being sweet.

      And i am very glad that here in Germany there is a lot of analcoholic beer available, because very often i want the taste without the drug.

      Still i agree with you that the memory of good times with beer makes it even better. I know a lot of people that don’t like the taste so much. So probably i am the outlier here.

    • YeahToast@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      I disagree as I find craft beer quite delicious . I try not to consume alcohol though as I don’t need to kill my brain anymore than I have…

  • Leviathan@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    I went to a microbrewery/restaurant recently that had kid’s beer in the menu. It was just juices and stuff, but it still felt fucking scummy.

  • quarkquasar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    The amount of adult stuff being deliberately pointed at children has increased quite a lot over even just the past couple years, because the corporations know that no one is going to come after them for it.

    Hell, at my work, we replaced a court-ordered anti-smoking sign with a giant wall of cigarettes, so that we could make room for a bunch of new fruity flavors of nicotine pouches so that kids can become new addicts.

    • Dingo_Kidneys@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      It’s always been the goal to get children consuming products. It’s a known function of humans that they usually stick to whatever they were doing when they were kids well into adulthood. It’s harder to convince an adult with pre-established routines and preferred products to switch over.

      You’re right though that it’s getting pretty blatant now, but that’s to be expected as we dismantle food and drug regulations.

    • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I suspect this is legal because “under aged” in the US doesnt explicitly mean “under 18”, since the legal drinking age is 21.

  • Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Yeah, teach them kids to drink from a young age, i’m sure it will be good for them

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      I mean, most countries drink 3-5 (some 7) years before Americans. By 21, people have kind of gotten over it and having beers for weekend chats and hangs is just normal. Drinking with intent or excitement to drink doesn’t exist without underlying mental issues.

      This advertising wouldn’t exist because it would be aimed at actual kids and teens. Whereas in the US you join the military, kill people for them, then after a few years of that, you’ve earned a beer with some alcohol in it.

      • baronvonj@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        I have more than once witnessed 18-20 year old service members drinking openly and legally in bars and restaurants by using their military ID.